Pleader88

Mordred, Read the article within the links that I've posted. The universe is not homogeneous and isotropic as you have described. It has a preferred axis of anisotropy.

I will continue to work with this. I strongly believe the condition exists which in essence removes the variable which leads one to believe that a form of Dark Energy exists. It is our nature to complicate things in order to do the un-natural, where nature tends to do the opposite in it's attempt to restore simplicity.

Wow it's gotten really quiet. I will try to find more supporting articles as time permits. If you feel this hypothesis might be a possibility please let me know. I could always use the support and I would like to keep this up front on the forum for others to consider.

Attached is a new diagram. Also see the following link for article. http://cosmosmagazine.com/news/is-universe-expanding-asymmetrically/ Metropolis PAL 09-16-14.pdf

Rather a hypothesis. For previous comments please see original thread. I had to start a new thread to upload a new diagram. I was able to find a supporting article which can be found at http://phys.org/news/2011-09-evidence-spacetime-cosmological-principle.html more to come as time permits. Metropolis PAL 09-16-14.pdf

MigL, You have misinterpreted the diagram. Apparently the way that it is drawn is misleading because you are not the only person who has. I have not once mentioned that the big bang or an explosion. Please see my response to Tar. Please see new thread for a new diagram which should be more clear.

This is one article that you might want to take a look at. http://phys.org/news/2011-09-evidence-spacetime-cosmological-principle.html Unfortunately I did not take note of the links that I have found so far. I will need some time to dig them back up. I was more concerned about getting the idea out there then supplying supportive articles.

Tar, The diagram has not been represented as an explosion and it's not the universe, nor is it referencing the big bang in any way. We do have knowledge of the stellar movement in all directions. From observations the universe seems to be expanding non-uniformly into a tube. Granted, a tube is not an elliptical shape. Due to the enormous amount of mass interacting in the universe it is difficult for us to see what is actually occurring. Think of the cannibalization of two galaxies on a much larger scale. Do the two galaxies not stretch? If we were inside one of the galaxies and only able to see a portion of it what would we see? We would see stars wildly moving away from us while others seemed to be moving closer or not at all. Regards, Pleader88

Endy and Dekan, You have both misinterpreted the diagram. There is a small dashed circle which represents all that we can see. The large circle does not necessarily represent the center of the universe. It is meant to represent a collection of mass. Think really big. Everything that we can see (the small circle) is being drawn to the large center of mass. Consider it to be present day. Sorry for the lack of quotes, for some reason the page is not functioning correctly for me.

Dark Matter is an entirely different subject. When I am able to I will gather up some information that I feel supports this hypothesis. I do not intend to be lazy about this. For now I just wanted to get this out there in case any of you may have come across something that seems to support it.

I'm not sure how to make it more "plain English", so I will explain a little bit about gravity. As mass accumulates it's gravitational strength is increased. Imagine a Sun suddenly gaining 100 solar masses. The planets would be pulled into it based on there mass and distance away from the sun. If all of the planets weighed the same and were equally spaced from the sun the first planet would be pulled the hardest and accelerated the fastest. The second planet would have 1/4 the pull and acceleration of the first. The third would have 1/4 the pull and acceleration of the second. The amount of space between the planets would be stretched as the planets fell inward.

This would not be a theory if I had proof. I do not have access to the type of observation equipment necessary to validate the theory. Many factors come in to play and it would be extremely difficult to map the movement of mass within our viewable universe because we cannot see beyond it with our current technology. As it stands the observed data is insufficient but is enough to support the model that has already been proven but not with precision. A model using Newton's law of gravity is a very simple one to do. With science, sometimes all we can do is make assumptions based on what we know. We can put our faith in a plausible model or into something that may not even exist. If your life depended on it, which would you choose?

This hypothesis eliminates the need for Dark Energy to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. If we assume the model is correct we can calculate the expansion of our viewable portion of the universe using established and proven standard equations. Observations have been made that supports the diagram within the following link or see attachment. http://www.docdroid.net/hjmx/metropolis-pal-9-12-14.pdf.html Metropolis Pal 9-12-14.pdf