J.C.MacSwell

In the context of "compressed to such a high degree in the central singularity"? I can only imagine.

Agree. It really isn't a requirement anyway, is it? I mean if there was some force that prevented compression beyond what we already know, how would that affect any external effects we might be able to observe from black holes?

Ask not what your country can do for you...ask what you can do for those in power

I don't know if he has a real chance but this guy certainly has interesting ideas and speaks them well.

Zapatos can correct me, but it seems he has demonstrated that was not his intention, but to give you an example of something you claimed you could not recall while implying it is unlikely to exist.

He did not. In good faith you should see that.

Where did he claim an equivalency?

Ironic.

Seems I struck a nerve...

Many Democrats seem to automatically assume it must be true, since historically it is unlikely for accusations to be made otherwise. I'll wait to hear the evidence and what may or not back it up. If nothing backs it up I won't necessarily disbelieve the accusation, but I will not consider it in my judgement of Biden. (not that my opinion might matter to him)

So...the Mexicans should build a wall...and make Americans pay for it! (just kidding)

Perhaps they could hire some temporary workers from Mexico.

They don't know what's in it. What I'm suggesting is there might be something that reasonably should not be disclosed.

Equivalent of. Can you explain the rational behind the law and guidelines as to why the report won't be released verbatim if not unfairness? No. They are asking for the complete report. Are they not?

Some allegations they may not care that much about. It may have come about during investigating something else. So a judgement call is required...is it really worth suggesting John Cuthber may have done such and such along with so and so without clear evidence...especially if, at worst, what John Cuthbert did isn't even indictable?

Clearly it doesn't. Trump claims it does. That doesn't mean I do. I did say exoneration of collusion with the Russian government was implied by the pointing out that he was not exonerated of obstruction, but I believe that was a mistake to offer that characterization in that manner. Trump is a somewhat obnoxious human being to put it mildly. That is not a reason to release all the information in the report unredacted. There are obvious legal reasons, and I think guidelines for special council not to IMO (I am hardly a legal expert, so grain of salt). It could be the equivalent of allowing libel if it's not indictable or worthy of it. Essentially nuisance allegations, most of which would be directed at someone other than Trump.

Isn't there information in it that lacks reasonable collaboration? Why should a bunch of allegations considered unprovable be made public?

My point was that it was specifically stated that Trump was not exonerated of obstruction of justice. This doesn't mean he was exonerated of collusion with the Russian Government but it does imply that, correctly or not, and intentionally or not. The statement seemed odd in any case. If they don't have enough evidence to indict, or recommend indictment, are they supposed to make that type of comment?

There is an implication in this that it does exonerate him of collusion with the Russian government.

It will. If...and only if...what accelerates the wheel has an equal downward force. You are assuming (incorrectly) a symmetric (pure torque) input about a "balanced" wheel...and (correctly) seeing an asymmetric output...giving you a net force you do not get For a non accelerating wheel see Swansont's hamster.

I wasn't sure I used the right icon...but rest assured I was at least somewhat commensurate with your plight. ...or should I say blight

Finally signs of your taking responsibility...

No. It was a joke. I apologize if you were offended as offence was not intended.

If you followed it you would realize it was with regard to Ten oz.s contention (whether correct or not, doesn't matter) that Trump supporters are responsible for Trump's comments denigrating McCain. Also. I regret to inform you that Trump is still alive...