GuitarPat

http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/are-we-part-of-a-single-living-organism/ ^ an article on Biocentrism I realize that you're not really supposed to post links, but since MIB and Animal house are in, I'm interested to hear what a physicists opinions are on the idea Lanza here is raising (the way he's raising it), or if there are obvious (to you) holes in his logic.

exactly, except beyond the scope of one galaxy in a marble. like maybe all the galaxies in our universe, and our universe as a whole is a particle in a "megaverse" as described ^. then making any/every particle in our "universe" a universe of its own. Forgive me for any obvious impossibilities, other than an interest in science documentaries and a high school physical science class, i have no formal schooling in physics.

This was actually a research-induced inquiry for my undergrad "Art of Revision" persuasion paper, where i decided to write an essay that persuades an audience stuck on either side of the "evolution or creationism" debate, to consider the possibility of an existence that utilizes both (although maybe not necessarily a creator, but a higher level being of sorts). I came across biocentrism and figured there may be other thoughts on the matter out there. I thought to ask professionals in the field.

... That our universe (meaning our understanding of this expanse of space populated by countless galaxies to an edge to where we can no longer observe) is actually a microscopic piece of (possibly) a living organism,existing in its own exponentially larger universe to ours? And that that implies it too is a microscopic piece of a larger organism and so on, implying that we too possibly contain infinite-exponentially smaller "universes" within us? Pat.