Jump to content

EllyDlight

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Favorite Area of Science
    Electromagnetism

EllyDlight's Achievements

Lepton

Lepton (1/13)

-11

Reputation

  1. I totally see how light bending would contradict this theory BUT it actually doesn't! This is the beautiful simplicity of it. I think that space is actually made up of pairs of electrons and positrons. Space and all vacuum is completely full of these particles. The reason we think they annihilate each other on contact is because all of their kinetic energy is released! These particles still exist and remain neutral. Light travels through these particles, the aether. And then the aether can actually change in density around the static electricity of the Earth. It is then the dense aether that is bending the light! Also positive charges DO fly into space! It's just that the electrostatic force is so weak that these objects have to be very light. If you do an experiment where you fill a soap bubble with positive particles, it will rise. If you fill a soap bubble with negative particles, it will fall! It makes sense that positrons and electrons attract each other simply because of pressure. Think of one positron and one electron having the same waveform but opposite, so that as one goes up, the other goes down. These wave forms will cancel each other out creating an area of low pressure between then making it seem like these particles are attracted. Conversely if you have two electrons with the same wave form, the wave form will amplify between them and they will appear to be repelled. Magnetism now makes sense!
  2. I think I just figured something out guys! Gravity! This is exciting for me. I found this website by someone named Franklin Hu. He says: "The proton and electron are not symmetric. The protons are typically bound to a material while the electrons are relatively free to wander. The asymmetry leads to situation where a typical mass will have more protons than electrons, or will somehow have a slightly positive charge. This slight charge imbalance added up over the mass of the Earth makes for a very large positive charge field coming from the Earth and other massive objects. This positive field pulls on any neutral matter like a charged balloon attracts neutrally charged pieces of paper. This causes any uncharged matter to stick to the Earth like a bad case of static cling. This is the fundamental cause of gravity. Gravity is nothing more than a strong electrostatic field and therefore this unites the electrostatic and gravity force. " Gravity is not separate from electricity, it's just static electricity. Wow. Does this make sense to anyone else? check out franklinhu.com i think this guy is on to a lot of basic sense
  3. I don't understand. Enough degrees of freedom in which EM field? Earth's EM field?
  4. Why can't it just be that different collections of particles have different strength magnetic fields? Magnetism can be extremely weak or extremely strong depending on the magnet. Why can't gravity be the pull of a magnetic field?
  5. I'm saying that gravity IS electromagnetism. So antigravity is a superconductor. I think light does need a medium to propagate. It propagates in the nearly vacuum environment of space. Electromagnetic fields are created by charged particles.
  6. I don't see how that is contradictory to what I'm saying, momentum either keeps going the direction it's going, or it goes in a different direction. I'm not saying that light doesn't exist. I'm just saying that light is excited particles and the excitement moves around as momentum. It is not contradictory to the photoelectric effect or ultraviolet catasrophe. Antigravity has been demonstrated. Just watch any video about superconductors and you can see levitation. I've only seen it in a small scale, I'm just thinking it would probably work in a larger scale. Also it's possible that someone has done this and it's classified. Also it's possible that no one has done this because we haven't tried yet. I'm not necessarily right, I'm just saying these are my observations so far and I'm trying to observe life with this consideration and see what happens. I'm also not saying sound and light have the exact same properties. I'm saying they differ in frequencies and that frequency difference is the reason they exhibit different properties. I agree with you that sound can't travel through a vacuum. In fact I'm not so sure light can either? From what I can see space is not a perfect vacuum, it just has way less particles in it--a near vacuum. Does a perfect even exist? I've never seen it. I'm not trying to be a dick and say anybody is wrong and I'm right. All I'm doing is making an observation and seeing how reality either does or does not fit into this observation.
  7. I believe that fundamentally the universe is simple and easy to understand. All complexities are massive quantities of interacting basic particles. The only particles necessary for understanding are electrons and positrons. Quarks are just made up by people. So try on the thought of electrons and positrons being spinning magnets. A neutron then is a collection of an equal amount of electrons and positrons so that it creates a neutral net charge. A proton is a collection of electrons and positrons with one more positron than electron. Atomic structure is created because a neutron is diamagnetic when exposed to the magnetic fields of a proton and an electron. For every proton, it creates enough diamagnetic energy to float one electron near it. This is why electrons are a distance away from the nucleus and do not crash into protons. It is also why when more protons than neutrons exist in a nucleus, an electron does crash into it and a neutron is created. This will continue happening until a magnetic equilibrium is reached. It makes sense that in space, a collection of these magnets in equilibrium could collide with other magnets to form structure like this everywhere. And then it is massive amounts of these interacting magnetic structures that create our reality. Then simply, photons do not really exist. What we percieve as light is resonance of these magnets. Resonance travels through particles as waves. Sound travels through particles as waves. Light and sound differ only in frequency. Waves travel differently through different densities. When you think about the universe as a tremendous amount of spinning, vibrating magnets it clears up a lot of questions. Now we can think of the sun and stars as superconductors with super cold dense centers. Superconductors are what happens when a substance is perfectly diamagnetic. The protons the sun is constantly spewing out interact with gases and create plasma that explain all solar phenomena. Plasma then is just a state of matter that is so conductive that atomic structure has broken apart and all particles flow. Then neutron stars are more dense stars and black holes are more dense neutron stars. The only reason we can't see a black hole is because the particles that make it up are not resonating at the frequency of light. The matrix of the universe is held together by the magnetic fields of these ultra-dense collections of particles and all the interacting magnetic fields of all particles. All universal phenomena is explainable through electricity and completely reproducable. All of a sudden antigravity isn't so complicated. All that you need to do is displace the magnetic flux lines of the earth or whatever field you are in with a superconductor. If magnetic field lines are going around a superconductor, then all forces are going around the superconductor. This explains quantum locking. People have been overcomplicating the universe by making up particles and names for forces that are just different instances of electromagnetism. I think it's time to concentrate on what we can observe. It's more than likely that this idea has been thought of by people a long time ago and that classified technology has been created by understanding these concepts. What I'm looking for is input and real life observations from other people to improve my own and humanity's understanding, especially relating to diamagnetic materials which I believe explains strong and weak nuclear force. Thank you note: This post is possibly repeated on other forums. This is because I'm looking for as much input as possible and I've found that other forums are banning me for creating this post. ??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.