Commander

You misunderstood. I said TIME is absolute whether you like it or not That believe word is figurative - don't get confused This is right and soundly part of Science and not Religion

swansont : What do you mean ?

Sensei : [ 2 C , 0 P ] imatfaal : [ 0 C , 2 P ]

TRUTH about anything is the ACTUALITY of What exactly it is and How exactly it behaves in times to come and not any Perception of Description of it in variance of the ACTUALITY !

[ 0 C , 0 P ] Hi , COMA is not a verb perhaps but I have accepted it .

I believe in Absolute Time wherher it is possible to measure it or not !

Sensei : Thank you for trying it out ! Best of Luck ! >>>>> RESPONSE : [ 1 C , 0 P ]

Hi, hypervalent_iodine, TY so much. Regards Thomas

Of course that was an yes ! Yes, as I had indicated I am thinking of a new explanation for this phenomenon under consideration with all Accepted Theories [supported by perceivable evidence] and proposed explanation about multi-dimensional imaginary projections with mathematical supporting Equations ! [which is quite hard for many questioning minds to simply accept and for many pragmatists and logical minds to follow all the steps involved] Of course my proposal was after years of thinking and imagination. However I have not still worked out the Mathematical Supporting Arguments fully. I can anticipate that any new, out-of-box ideas in this area will have to face, Opposition by Believers of existing Science, Questions for proof and clarity and total ironing out of allied philosophies, Counter-Theories and Opposite Views etc and therefore I did not put it up here and had a second thought. Therefore, after putting up my Main Point of Contentions I have edited/modified/deleted my proposal from the thread "Everything is unique !" However I have a hunch that everything that has been posted here are archived and therefore even after editing and modifying every time-stamped states of these posts are recorded. I request the Moderators to clarify on this as to who all can have access to all Posts and Archives of Modifications ! Also, deleted attachments !! Thank you Moderators, [especially imatfaal, Phi for All & Swansont] Regards PS : This will help me in my further interactions !

Thank you Studiot, What you said makes nice reading. Yes, I will put in more efforts if required. I also am thinking about the whole thing from different view point, angle and perspective. Regards

If the water falls and hits the turbine blades it transfers force and energy thereby ! If the water simply follows geodesic paths and does not actually have Energy how do you explain that ? Two identical Springs have been Compressed into an identical shape. One by a great stone following geodesic gravitational Curvature of the Potential Energy of the Stone. The other by my Own Muscular Power - without drawing on my weight - say hand power. Perhaps I expended some energy drawn from the metabolism of some Food content. Explain the setup with Curvature of Space and Strings and what happens if the spring expands to : Drive a Clock hands Project a Bullet Just release into Air or Water What happens if it simply expands into Vacuum or Empty Space ?

I believe, as I am lying on my bed being pressed down by gravity , it has to be a true force and not just Space Time Curvature !

Yes, Sensei, but here I was talking only about Integers

I had asked for clarity about wave , particle and string ! [i did read sensei's post] I understand if I am unable to visualize these myself then others too will have difficulty in explaining them out. If we consider Light [perhaps the purest form of energy] as an Electromagnetic Wave which gets generated in a Source : [a] What causes it to travel, that too at such a high Speed and where is it headed and why As a Electromagnetic Wave does it spread omni-directionally from its source and what exactly is the Wave which defines its propagation [c] What is then a Photon and its relation with [a] and Further to this I am thinking of a theory about some physical phenomenon and am wondering whether it is OK for me to propose it here !

Just taking a Clue from what was suggested by Phi for All : I will not make proposals or statements about what I think or have decided about. Instead I will ask Questions ! I for one have never understood what is a Wave, Particle or String. Can someone explain to me what they are how they present themselves and how they can be visualized/perceived. Also , if Bosons are occupying the same Spatial Position, and if that is possible how do we assume Neutrons in a Nucleus are not doing the same and how do we prove that their position and behaviour is different from that of Bosons ?

Yes, I agree with your point too !

Strange : Are these two different or same. If they are different Spatially each one is unique as we defined. If they are both on the same spatial point : I get your point that you claim they can be on the exact point and piggybacking or superimposing on each other and you are unable to separate them. I understand your consternation. You don't have to separate them. If you can not distinguish them at all they must be treated as a different particle [double particle] or entity as they have doubled their Mass and other properties. Best regards Thomas Phi for All : Hi, Thank you for your views and points. I don't mind getting contradicted / corrected if the ideas are untenable. Best Regards Thomas

andreasiva : Hi, I had said : I can justifiably extend the same Logic to even to non-animate bodies and say that no Particle , atom, Molecule etc too can never be an exact duplicate of another !!! Though in many cases it does not matter to vary slightly and can be treated to be Identical !!!! ie I can justifiably extend the same Logic to .......... I do believe in my suggestion, but if someone proves to me [i am still to get that proof and I scientifically believe that such a proof is impossible - because any proof will be followed by my queries] that there is an Exact Duplicate I may not argue against it. Still when we consider Space-Time differences "Everything is Unique" holds good for Physical Entities and I agree with you it does appear to be taking a step back from Original Proposition. Because as a normal Human and Mortal I am not blessed with an ability to weigh, measure and equate particles, tiny waves or strings ! Here only the Reputation and Scientific Standing matters and those who are not among, Galileo, Kepler,Newton, Einstein etc are not taken seriously !! Therefore I said now : Undetectable differences between Equal Entities may be considered Identical !! But every Entity [such physical] needs to be different - at least in the Spatial Position !!! I really don't know whether I have stayed on the same spot or taken a step forward or taken a step backwards ! Yes, I can be assumed to keep reevaluating as the Time goes on ........... Best Regards Thomas

Everything is Unique as far as the things considered are Physical Bodies and Entities whether Organic or Inorganic, Moving or Static [nothing is static anyway] , living or inanimate etc ! Where the Entity can be comprised of certain Mass, certain Dimension, certain Temperature, certain lattice of matter elements and particles etc and thereby can not escape detection. Undetectable differences between Equal Entities may be considered Identical !! But every Entity [such physical] needs to be different - at least in the Spatial Position !!! Only in abstract Entities like Numbers, Colors, Program Modules, Elements of TRUTH and FACTS such as Formulas, Legal Points, Acts , Policies, Physical Laws, Historical Facts and Events can be regarded , treated, replicated and accepted to be Same, Equal, Equally Applicable, Universally Constant and thereby Identical to each Replication !

Nice

Coming Soon ......

No one has tried to solve this yet !

swansont : Can you explain your point.

Well, I did write a reply and somehow it didn't go through gue to my Computer glitch. I will try to write it again here : Though they are called identical twins the point is that no two humans can ever be identical- twins or not. Though the DNAs of both are almost identical - a replication of the same DNA, no replication can ever be exactly Identical. Therefore, nothing separated by Space can ever be IDENTICAL and therefore Everything has to be Unique ! What we call Identical are almost SAME , EQUAL to one another in most aspects and even can not be differentiated at all by testing. Still as much as we can argue about it, when we can recognize two Entities as different from each other they are more than likely to have some Variation in their characteristics. In the case of DNA etc there is always a constant Evolution taking place due to this differences as the Life Organisms CAN NOT REPLICATE IDENTICALLY !! I am slowly getting SOLD into this THOUGHT which I got that EVERYTHING IS UNIQUE !!! >>>>>>> PS : Oh OK ; what I wrote earlier has also appeared. It must be another Comment which went missing

tar : 12 identical sections of the Sphere as you have indicated with 12 Squares drawn on the Spherical surface and if cut off at the 14 Points of intersections [6 intersections having 4 lines meeting and 8 intersections having 3 lines meeting] results in 12 rhombus shapes of the Polyhedron left. This is precisely the Polyhedron which will be created by BOXING THE CUBE as I mentioned elsewhere. That is , planes are attached so as to create a 4 lined ROOFS on each of the 6 Faces of the Cube in a SYMMETRICAL WAY. But alas it will have to retain the eight 3 lined Corners of the parent Cube though with flatter non- 90 Deg Roof Angles lines rotated from the Original Cube. Because of this eight intersections have 3 lines meeting points [just like the cube's corners. Along with these 8 six more newly erected 4 lined corners one on top of each face of the Cube adds up to 14 Corners / Intersections. Because of these 3 line / 4 line corners [each rhombus having 2 four lined corners and 2 three lined corners] we have Rhombus shapes and not Squares on the Polyhedron. I need to confirm what should be their Angles. Therefore, Boxing a Tetrahedron Symmetrically produces a perfect Cube Boxing a Cube Symmetrically produces a 12 faced Polyhedron with equal Rhombus faces. If we bloat up each Polyhedron to Spherical Surfaces we have 4 Triangles drawn on the Sphere for tetrahedron, 6 Squares drawn for Cube and 12 Squares drawn for this 12 faced Rhombus hedron. Splitting each square face of the Cubic bloat-up will produce 24 faced Polyhedron. Strangely, there is no way of producing 8 equal Square faces on the Sphere, Using 2 tetrahedrons in a mirror tilt may produce 8 equidistant points on the surface of the Sphere but connecting them may again result in Triangular shapes and not squares. Regards