techtalknow

Thank you for posing a kind and helpful reply. I actually understand what you're trying to say.

Well played.

"The key to winning any debate is ensuring that you have the last word". That right here, while it is the simplest thing ever, makes the most sense of everything I've read on this thread so far.

So then how is it that the materials for the Big Bang or whatever came into existance? What created time? Or material? Existance, substance? Matter cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be made to change forms. But does that mean that everything we are today has just been recycled and changed forms over the millenia, or does that allow you to accept the possible existance of an Intelligent Designer?

Evolution is a religion against creationism. If you're against evolution, then you're for its opposite. By being against evolution you accept that there are other scientific or religious possibilities, including Intelligent Design by a divine maker.

You call me a coward? You realize you're struggling so much with a 15 year old you've stooped to calling me a narrow-minded ignorant coward?

I refuse to listen to someone who sources their information from Wikipedia.

Apparently you haven't evolved enough to be capable of doing a simple Google Search.

So you're telling me that my arguments are false. Present me with a rebuttal.

While I PERSONALLY believe in creationism, my debate is in regards to anti-evolutionism. I'd prefer we kept it to that. Obviously you guys have little tolerance for things you can't understand. Who knows, maybe this conversation has created an evolutionary pressure that could cause you to learn some decency...then again, I don't think you're advanced enough to evolve just sayin

And "Discussing science" involves insulting my beliefs? Mhm sure

If they do decide to throw things at me, I'll throw them back a hell of a lot harder, and I'll make sure you're the first person to know,

Are you challenging him to a personal debate?

The main topic here is Human Evolution, to be specific. Plants and doges have nothing to do with the HUMAN aspect. There is a debate. There are people who accept YOUR illusion of reality and there are people who accept MINE. I'd rather I got constructive, helpful feedback on my OG post instead of having my beliefs insulted and belittled.

It's a shame you don't have the capacity for nor the faith to believe in things that aren't tangible to the human. Again, you're not only belittling the work I put in, you're going on the offensive against creationism. The debate is pro/anti evolution, not evolution vs creationism.