apologia

what were your thoughts on the test? Difficult? Easy in any way? How does one study for such a test?

all i can think of is the bouncing ball problem. You know, if you bounce a ball from a building, then it goes half the distance each time... I think this is similar in the way that you're seeing how close (limit) you can come to the ground before having to go back up, then minus that distance and so on. Hope you caught any of that.

thats not what the theory states. Thats just how it's been misinterpreted by the later scientists.

The universe will run out of available energy. The universe at one time will only consist of unavailable energy, making the system stop.

If there is no evidence at all, there's obviously no evidence against it. Its not a scientific theory because it has no scientific models, predictions, or identity.

http://www.towson.edu/~ladon/empiric.html if you're looking at how to do the empirical formula, theres tons of references.

you would need to raise the rifle a little higher, due to wind resistance. However, you need velocity to see the power of the bullet as it leaves the gun.

can someone give me a spoiler for the flashgate v2?

lvl 3 apprentice; the part with the password

I believe God created Adam and Eve in their fully developed form. They then had children through sexual intercourse. About the who created God part, God is eternal, meaning He's always been in existence. Explain the concept of eternity to your child.

Pretty interesting stuff. Never heard of this. About doctors and the cure, i dont believe that finding the cure for a disease is as important to them as finding the problem. If someone finds out what causes cancer and how it developes, then from there they can come up with solutions.

and you assume this why? terrible argument. Old sea scrolls found have matched the modern bible very consistently, except for the spelling of a few words

Actually, if you take the bible literally as well as put it together, you'll find that evolution caused by God is not consistent with his nature

if dark was a form of light, then wouldn't the term dark have no meaning?

no. Darkness is nothing more than the absence of light. You cant make dark darker