MomentTheory

I was not suggesting that we were headed back towards the big bang singularity but rather the universe founded its existence that it might experience existence itself through DNA. What I was suggesting is that extra terrestrial evolutionary creatures have already made it this far along the path of discovery and have since made devices to radiate their acknowledgement of the singularity through out space and time. Perhaps that is why "prophesy" for the most part, is the same across all cultures. Perhaps it is a cosmic remainder of a broadcast sent by our intelligent brothers, we pick up on bits and pieces via live transmission, or meditation.

Why has no one pointed out that the theory of relativity already makes clear acknowledgment of what he is saying at light speed. Consider the dark space thought experiment where you are a person in complete darkness with a flash light with no reference point of anything or force of any kind. Suddenly a light appears in the distance and appears to be moving towards you, as it gets closer it is noticed to be another human holding a light just like you. The human passes by and moves away from you, once again you are left with no motion. To the other person, the exact same thing happens, only you appeared to be moving. Both people think they are stationary when in fact they are not. This entire thread can be closed up into that little shell, nothing else need be discussed. At light speed, everything is singular, at slower speeds things become defined and take form, with perspective comes uniqueness, and thus the entire fault of the logic being battled upon.

Standard, the point is to test light curvature through a medium.

What axis are you referring to in regards to your first question? Yes, anti clockwise is the definitive direction when dealing with parallel mirrors. I've tested it using free moving mirrors to manipulate the angles with the same results. Although the curve becomes practically immeasurable beyond a certain degree, this curve is present regardless.

This is the most basic technical data of the experiment I described in a video earlier this month, for your consideration. I've kept it short and sweet in a 3 page PDF. Moment Theory In A Nutshell.pdf

If what you are saying is correct, by your own logic of exponential technological expansion we have already reached singularity once before and the said being has already become sentient meaning we are currently experiencing its divine truth. I'll let you decide if you want that to be the truth or not. That is the big question is it not? I mean obviously, the big bang is the singularity that the universe already agreed upon.

I would say that what you are describing is that perspective of form is always different, which would make more sense.

Thank you for all your wonderful suggestions, I definitely am going to rebuild this to a finer quality and retest my results. https://pdf.yt/d/_ZaAJVl64f2lcXAs/download I've put my results and conclusions together in a 3 page nutshell for those that would like to see it. I think you might be on to something, I was not aware of this effect. It seems probable this curve is as you said, a larger scale of this black phenomena. I have devised a theoretical device based off my observations in regards to an infinite energy pump, but I have not attempted to make a prototype of any sort so it is pure speculation.

I see what you are saying, I guess the correct wording would be "no visible light as part of the trajectory of the beam". I tested this with both a 5 mw (shown in the video) and a 150mw laser to ensure that intensity wasn't the limiter. Both lasers produced the same exact result, on the contrary a 1mw laser does lack intensity and produces only 6-7 visible reflections. Even in suggesting that there is insufficient light to carry on, if all lasers 5mw+ are limited by this curve then I have discovered a new constant of light; which enables me to directly relate it to average velocity via Snell's law, exactly what I'm purposing with Moment Theory.

I was just imagining it as described by Stephen Hawking and others, where the observer would see the entrant of the black hole begin to spin or become two > infinite parts. The repeated reflection stops at 49 (Yy), and the curve ends. Even when I split the bottom mirror, no photons are ejected. The trajectory of the light should be at point Zz, but no photons are present. Destructive interference would only arise if the curve were not present; meaning that if the trajectory was a complete straight line the interfering photon paths could cross and cancel each other out, but what I am seeing must be an entirely different phenomena, given the distinct "die off" of light between reflection 42-49. I've done my best to illustrate this below.

I show at the 42-43rd reflection when I allow the light to come out. The 49th reflection is on the top. Yes, it was a terrible exaggeration but when you consider what is thought to happen on the event horizon, you can imagine it that way if you like. I have only tried mirror glass because I am trying to measure how light slows down based upon passing through a set number of mediums. My relation to the hands on a clock were in relation to the way the gear ratios work behind the scenes, and if you play with other metaphysical values such as 2x and 1/3x you get the radii values of 3:00, and 9:00 (1800) You are correct, about it not being exact with the clock hands at 6:30 but that is because the 600.5 radius is the only one that we can accurately measure, thus on the clock we can differentiate the difference with gears (where the small hand is also accurate in depicting 6:30). But in considering that the 1201 radius can never be measured EXACTLY, due to a combined metaphysical value (in the experiment this combined value is created from the laser to the first reflection, I've dubbed it as "A" on my codex, where A can be any distance with the same curve results, we know it as am and pm), is what causes the loop to occur upon 12:00. It is my plan to rebuild it using a micrometer and a better set up, but even in doing so, I'm certain the curve will remain the same. I can clearly see that artifacts or inaccuracy is not a matter of the issue. Light follows this same curve regardless of how adjust the source laser, but becomes very unpredictable after a certain angle beyond the 60/60/60 of an equilateral triangle.. Anyone can see this curve's presence by holding a mirror under your eyes and looking into another mirror. The curve is ALWAYs there when dealing with reflections through a medium.

You are correct, it is VERY crude. The mirrors themselves are not curved in any manner and I used a table saw with a jig to ensure the slots were as accurate as I could possibly get them. I ascertained the idea that I would never be able to achieve a true parallel condition, but upon observing how light reacts( by rotating the laser), I made the observation that the geometric curve itself is independent from any variables in the experiment. You can view this same phenomena of curvature when you hold a mirror under your eyes and look into another mirror. The reflections will repeat forever with a distinct curve into the perspective point. While changing any aspect of the experiment has an effect on the shape of the curve, the curve is seemingly forced to occur by some external geometry. I plan to rebuild this using a micrometer and higher quality mirrors, but I am certain the results will be the same. Considering that the curve limitation occurs on the 49th reflection, (@ point 7x7 ,and yes, I know I am generalizing), it seems to me that it is no coincidence that light would relate to a numeric value of 7, given that our metaphysical perception of sound is also based upon a group of 7 (do re me fa so la ti or ABCDEFG). Maybe I'm pulling coincidence out of my ass, maybe I'm not, but something fishy is going on here.

Forget that I said anything about having a completed theory for just a moment, (as I'm well aware it's not 100% YET); bottom line, it's unsettling that the radii are not irrational numbers. I don't believe in numerical coincidence, as I do not believe in any coincidence. I'm not purposing anything outside of the observations I have made. As for photons reflecting 1 billion +times, I'm well aware of that. I wasn't purposing that they can't, merely stating that when light travels from a single source, through two mirrors (including the glass medium) the trajectory itself is limited. I'm aware that this could be defeated by using front faced mirrors, but that would also remove the phenomena I'm trying to measure. Mordred's reference to snell's law is awesome, and I'm glad he noticed! The reflective index of snell's law is an "average" of velocity, which is where I derive my entire theory from! Given that velocity is the only universal controller of light's trajectory; logically it becomes the only other way to measure light beyond its instantaneous speed. To do so one must find a universal curve that we can all agree upon as true. Which is exactly what I'm trying to show. As for a trion re being "woo", I'm not really sure what that even means. Just because some blogger said some weird shit doesn't make a shape invalid. You can see the trion re take form in nature, pretty much everywhere, so to deny its existence is ludicrous. Not if the said average velocity is based upon this curve. If we can agree that this curve is always true, at that point the curve itself becomes the unit of measure, enter, "light radius". In doing so, we can agree upon an exact numerical average velocity of light, regardless of one's perception in space-time, getting rid of the need for such trivial things like time and distance. Quantum mechanics has already shown us that time and distance are in fact trivial, we just need a measurement to prove it. *Cough cough* this curve.

Your jest is not at all appreciated. Of all places, I thought the best reception for this discovery would be here. If no one see's value in the data I am presenting then obviously this community is not ready, nor educated on a broad enough spectrum for the implications of such a discovery. Your strict adherence to the academic process of scientific discovery is your biggest folly. I am disappointed, I know you are automatically rejecting this as pseudoscience, because that is the easiest thing for you to do simply because I am asking tough questions about hard data and ignored facts.

I'm not sure how to educate one on what a trion re shape is aside from telling you to research it, and your presumption that I didn't understand anything at all was quite rude and is most likely the entire cause for the repression of such claims when venturing down this avenue of discovery. The unit of measure when alluding to the Average Velocity of Light is irrelevant because it is universally true and does not require a perspective point in space-time. My experiment proves that while on average, photons always travel at the speed of light, a definite phenomena occurs at the 49th reflection, giving an ability to measure its average velocity(or curve). The problem is not that I am not understanding a book, because my results are not based off of his book, but rather actual data derived from my experiment. Based upon your response, I would hypothesize that you aren't quite grasping the importance of what I've discovered. Familiarize yourself with the 5 basic string shapes and M-theory, take a look at the trion re, the schwarzschild blackhole equation, then return with such judgments. The data is there. Light always travels the path of a Trion Re with the average velocity of ((3x10^8)+1)/3 (units irrelevant) when viewed through the controlled curve created by this experiment. The ability to leave the units irrelevant from a relative point, rises from the equalization of both energetic and geometric sources in this experiment. While this allusion is very hypothetical, one can not ignore such a link between geometry, light, and time. If the resulting curve of this experiment was an irrational number I would have thrown it out, but the fact that the two radii are so close to our representation of 12-hour time can not be numerical coincidence.

I was alluding to the fact that if an entire book is based off of ignorance to data revolving around light (which is the current limit of all physics), then the book is infact ignorant to everything in the universe. Yes, I was being clever, but I found it astonishing to see that after feeling so much trust for the writer, sure that the avenue of light was not over looked. I will keep that in mind. I'm not trying to generalize, I've never really taken part in formal scientific discussion, I've always pursued an avenue of self education and as a result I'm not surrounded by many peers that even understand what I've been working on. But the few that do, recognize its importance.

My experiment shows that light is limited to 49 reflections through glass; when this is forced to occur, the resulting curve resembles that of a trion re, a singular point pulled into 3 dimensions. The curve and other data that can be derived from the experiment, allows one to calculate a definite average velocity of light which can be numerically expressed as: ((3x10^8)+1)/3 This finding frees light from its once thought single constant instantaneous value.

Please, accept my apology. This is my first time posting, I just wasn't sure where to start. Thanks for the help.

Hi folks! I'm in the process of putting together a single syllable universal model (theory of everything) based off of a discovery I recently made. I have made a brief video in which I did my best to explain the very, very basics of the experiment I am building my work upon, Moment Theory. The experiment is relative simply based upon this quote found in the back of Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe" where he states -- [see "Notes Chapter 2." The Elegant Universe. Boston: NOVA, 2003. 390-91. Print.] “When light travels through a substance such as air or glass its speed is decreased in roughly the same way that a rock dropped from a cliff is dragged to a slower speed when it enters a body of water. This slowing of light relative to its speed through a vacuum is of no consequence for our discussion of relativity and is justifiably ignored throughout the text.” Justifiably ignored!? I don't think so!!! NOTHING is JUSTIFIABLY ignored! In the video I briefly address the main radius of the trion re of light (time) and suggest that we received knowledge of time from an outside source, whether God, alien, or evolutionary drive. I think it's very important we keep an open mind about how we actually derive any variable we choose to assign the universe, as men. Here is a link to the video on youtube, Keep in mind I was explaining this for the average facebook viewer so I took some liberties when explaining the metaphysical nature of y as it applies to strings, but I have alot more background work put together showing my findings for anyone else who is interested in more details. I know I'm just touching the tip of an iceburg here that has gone un-noticed by the entire scientific community. I believe this discovery is the key to unlocking zero-point energy, releasing us from the bonds of carbon fuel. Beyond that, based upon the curve shown in the video, I have been able to apply at least one constant average velocity of light, which is universally true from all perspectives in space-time. This link allows for calculations of both quantum and relative values with in the same equation. I hope you enjoy the video, feel free to ask any questions. Try not to beat me up too bad, I'm no rocket scientist, I've just got a very keen eye for geometric patterns and I'm sure there is more value here than meets the eye. Much love, Aaron Hobba