Hey so, I have just found this forum because I wanted to express this (maybe silly and flawed) idea that I had to maybe find a way of reducing the amount of atmospheric CO2 we have, to try and help to solve the ever growing problem of climate change.
I have been researching ways we could reduce atmospheric CO2, such as thermal decomposition, however this requires a temperature of about 1300 degrees C, which would probably mean using more greenhouse gases to use the process than it does removing it.
An idea which I had, would be to remove the CO2 that is in the ocean. I researched this a little bit, and there is a company which does this with a product called Liquicel, a product used at commercial level for who knows what purposes. However, if we used this on a large scale on the ocean, we could disrupt the equilibrium of atmospheric CO2 to that of CO2 in the ocean, and cause the sea to (un-scientific word alert) "suck up" more of the CO2 that is in the atmosphere, at least quicker than it already this.
Not only could this help the problem of global warming, but it also could reduce the acidity of the sea also, and restore it back to normal levels to help organisms in the ocean to survive.
Now, I'm sure there are many flaws with this, but I would like to see what they are. Having not even completed my chemistry GCSE course yet, I'm intrigued to know what more qualified people would think!