GeneralDadmission

If you mean this one it isn't linking.

The recombination product of primordial helium would not be evident within the CMBR but would still be cosmologically important in the form of DM/DE?

thanks ajb. I'll go from there. I am trying to define whether it is important which element stabilises first. I don't see hydrogen stabilising first and would consider helium the stabilising element that allows temperature to drop to a level that allows hydrogen production.

I'd have to assume it would be that which distinguishes either.

Is there any hypothesis on what provides symmetry breaking for BB expansion and is there a definable model of particle stabilisation?

cheers. The title of the thread was misleading if you thought I was looking for feedback on whether there was a BB. I am more interested in how a spacially finite univerese is modelled.

Interested to hear what the review on these papers is here. Have just begun reading them so I don't have any questions as yet. Cosmology from quantum potential http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269314009381 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3093v3 Dark Matter and Dark Energy from Bose-Einstein condensate http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.0753

Can you identify for me what is specifically significant regarding the energy density's energy level and what is defined as equal? In regard the second passage why would a preferred direction and location be measurable spacially? ie; If time moves in the direction of gravitation the preferred direction is err,,, futureward and the preferred location is now. This would be a fair point to raise the question of whether it is simply assumed that hydrogen stabilised first before reionization? I've had to assume that the basic planck timeline description of the BB epochs available on wiki are a simplification of modelling with greater definiton. I cannot say the model I constructed for the period between BB inflation and reionization in order to get an understanding of relativity is as vague as the basic descritpions provided of the forces seperating in wiki type references.

I'm hoping you've answered all my physics related questions but only time will tell.. Cheers Mordred.

And I was hoping to reach a resolution by the morning. How long did it take you to disprove your modelling? This hobby could keep me going indefinitely!

This has a lot to do with why I prefer the matter/antimatter model. It treats the vacuum as a particle with it's own velocity. The velocity of one is interdependent to that of the other. There is no equalization between the two except in the case that the universe leads to a Big Rip, in which case there is a point at which either field would reach a point of total uniformity of internal relativity with subsequent collapse between the two fields. I will need some time to absorb your response to address it further. Cheers.

Didn't think that would actually be difficult to answer.

Why is the compression value of vacuum not considered the cosmological constant? Is it not vacuum tension that distributes kinetic energy?

No worries. I'll take that into account for my purposes. Thanks for the correction.

So just acceleration won't produce time dilation?

On average, how much younger than the average person would people who have made the following career choices be, by the time they retire? Fighter/test pilot Formula1 driver Top Fueler driver

I understand the experiment. What I assume is that within a void probability should allow a method of observation of an antimatter universe should it be there. I do not have enough technical knowledge on photon defraction to pursue that subject however. It is entirely a speculation. I have cleared up a couple of questions that were avoiding my clear comprehension. Thanks for the references Mordred.

Involving time in describing the model is of little benefit. As I understand it the charge superposition is imposed on the vacuum providing either with an opposing inflationary value. It is only vacuum velocity that would separate either constituent. That is about my take on it. I guess I referenced voids because if there were a place where an antimatter universe might be measured/observed from it would be in an environment with minimal gravitation. I'd guess if one had access to a void the nature of the double slit experiment would allow a method to observe an antimatter universe. That doesn't mean I'm volunteering to be sent anywhere though.

I don't see any reason why a Higgs mechanism would exclude a matter/antimatter universe. Are they exclusive?

Seesaw? I haven't heard that description of the Higgs mechansim. I don't see any reason why a Higgs mechanism would exclude a matter/antimatter universe. Are they exclusive?

Ok. Question. " Acceleration of cosmic inflation Cosmic inflation and the accelerated expansion of the Universe can be characterized by the equation of state of dark energy. In the simplest case, the equation of state of the cosmological constant is . In this case, the above expression for the scale factor is not valid and , where the constant H is the Hubble parameter. More generally, the expansion of the Universe is accelerating for any equation of state . The accelerated expansion of the Universe was indeed observed.[1] According to observations, the value of equation of state of cosmological constant is near -1. Hypothetical phantom energy would have an equation of state , and would cause a Big Rip. Using the existing data, it is still impossible to distinguish between phantom and non-phantom ." If the value of cosmological expansion is -1, would the dynamic underlying expansion be definable as a square root equation? This question is addressed somewhat in the next passage on Fluids. This is the first I have heard of quintessence in connection to dark energy. I have been investigating the matter/antimatter universe proposal as that model establishes a quintessence mechanism AFAICT.

Ok. Thank you very much.

If I have a conjecture in investigating this direction it is the question of vacuum. Without a mechanism that stabilises it how does exponential expansion of BB equilibrate? I have to assume that the electromagnetic energy that is exerted on the universe we observe plays a role in vacuum maintenance. I can see no reason this would be stable without relativity being maintained with a mass of common origin but polaric momentum.

Thanks Mordred. I think I'll have some time to go over that this week as it turns out.

I have read the paper. I don't have a problem with the description. The question is better discussed by entirely eliminating a value for time and examining the charge superpositions the model anticipates. Life is busy so I'll approach it that way when I get the chance.