tyme

The problem with proving the big bang, the singularity that started what we know, is that we don't even know if it happened, there is no solid evidence on the theory. Everyone is trying to prove their own proof. Some of you reading this will defiantly disagree with me, but do you actually have evidence of such a thing?

How does human product manufacturing have anything to do with the big bang? You know, even the iron ore is dug from the Earth's crust which give this cycle of yours 4 phases now. But of course the iron ore wasn't made there. The iron had to come from some place hot and under a lot of pressure, centres of stars, hurled into space through supernovas, meaning you need to add yet another stage. Said cycle could go on until the universe ends, if it will.

There is no afterlife, heaven nor hell. Yet again this is coming from a person that does not believe in a god. To be honest I still wonder why people still trust the bible over our knowledge.

I like to think of the first and second dimension as nothing other than points in geometry & that our shared universe is three dimensional, everything has a width, length and height does it not. Time is the fourth dimension but yet again time might be nothing other than a tool used to tell the current date and the minute of an hour. Time might not be time at all but some other unknown force that is affected by gravity.

So, we are organisms of three dimensions. QM shows us that there are more than ten dimensions. Anyway, this thread is a question. If you believe in fourth dimensional organisms, do you also believe in higher or even lower dimensional organisms. Might sound weird but if there are indeed fourth dimensional beings, could there also be organisms that are limited to two dimensions?

I am referring to time's flow, and how time effects an objects speed from a different POV.

When traveling at c, an object's mass will become infinite. You would also need an infinite source of energy. I doubt Humans will find the infinite source of energy required to travel at c within the next half a millennia. So I'm calling time travel plausible for the moment.

I understand where you're coming from, but that would make the universe a 13 billion year old GIF. If the universe was made of frames, where would they go? The past is solid, you cannot change or repeat it and you direct the future. This is a simple theory and I like it, but it is unlikely sorry.

Just to note that the average Human eye can see 25-30 FPS. Thats why you see a glimpse of your hand's previous location when you move it, its not the past or future.

What you said is not traveling through time but altering times flow. Yes traveling at c will make time for you slower, but thats all it is, time going slower for you and faster around you.

You're saying that Humans can travel through time by simply "increasing" gravity. Its a lot harder to travel through time, as a matter of fact traveling through time is still a theory haha. As far as we know time can be slowed down but not passed through.

What I'm thinking is not simple to say, or type. I'll put it another way. Time slows down near any physical object with weight, for smaller physical objects the difference is insignificant, but still there. If you are in the same place where time is being slowed down, everything's speed will decrease including yourself. Since you have been slowed down (thought processing, movement, the whole lot) you won't notice the time difference. Say there is empty space, and then a black hole a few thousand miles away from that empty space. Time around the black hole will be noticeably different due to the gravity impact of the black hole. Imagine you threw a soccer ball towards the black hole from the empty space and waited for the ball to arrive at the black hole. (it will take a long time to arrive). Since there is nothing slowing the ball down, it will continue to travel to the black hole. When the ball is caught in the black holes gravity, it will be pulled into the event horizon. Time around the black hole will be slowed down, and so will the ball. You are still watching from the empty space. The ball should speed up while it is sucked into the event horizon, but since time around the black hole is slowed down, the ball will be slowed down too from your POV. From the ball's POV, time is running normally. With time being different everywhere, it is impossible to tell if our surroundings are slower or faster than times normal flow without atomic clocks or viewing a massive gravitational time distortion around a massively dense and heavy physical object. Time on Earth is slower than the space above because of Earth's gravity. Everything on Earth is affected by this 'slowed time' effect, including us.

I'm saying that time gives speed limitations. Just looking for opinions on this theory.

Hey guys. I guess I'm wrong with this random theory about time, but since everyone here is smarter than I am I was wondering if anyone could see if this theory is wrong, or right. Here it goes. I have been thinking about time for a while now, and how it works. I kept thinking about how time is affected by speed & gravity. Anyway the theory is that time might be the limitation of how fast everything moves, and there might even be a time barrier. With the 'time barrier' I am referring to c, as nothing is apparently faster.