tylers100

An analogy between life directionality laws and a bit of computer programming, to better understand a bit: A rule. Maybe use logical operators. Form a relation / relationship between variables. Detect, identify, or classify then assign variables with conditions (eg. Greater than, less than, and so on) then perform arithmetic operators until these (variables) equalize to being sum of both or more. Equalized variables. Either an input of command to change the value of a variable or enter a new variable and so on. Maybe this could be used to better understand the fundamental interactions between forces or fields in the universe, especially the relation / relationship between all. See – link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

ASD revised, changed to "Life Directionality" Life Directionality Laws - Definitions: (note: 'x, y, or more' used below refer to objects from at microscopic level such as sub-atomic particles to macroscopic objects / systems such as planets, stars, galaxies, universe, etc or vice versa) and / or people in general) Life Directionality Law 1 of 6 - Directionality: A directional determiner or determining process between x and y or more toward a result. Life Directionality Law 2 of 6 - Connection: For x and y or more to have a type and a level of relation or relationship between both or more, then both or more must establish a connection between both or more. Life Directionality Law 3 of 6 - Conditional Change / Adaption: If either x or y or more to be less or greater than sum of both or more while still maintaining a type and a level of relation / relationship between each other, then both or more must undergo a conditional change process until either or more equalize to being sum of all or adapted. Life Directionality Law 4 of 6 - Equilibrium: If either x or y or more being conditioned to change in any level toward being equalized to sum of all or adapted while still in a type and a level of relation / relationship between each other, then both x and y or more must be equalized to each other or all and therefore are in an equilibrium. Life Directionality Law 5 of 6 - Coherence / Sustainability: For long as x and y or more that are in an equilibrium with each other or all, then x and y or more must be coherent and sustained. Life Directionality Law 6 of 6 - Separation: For x and y or more to discontinue a type and / or a level of connection (eg. relation / relationship) between each other or all, then either, both, or more must cancel upon on and / or by their own directionality with each other or more. Sometimes this can be seen as a different type of 'conditional change' of sort. At least to me, this seems to explain the arrow of time and entropy.

I see. Thank you for answering.

Question I'd like to re-quote a general question I asked on an other thread, as it seems to be relevant to this thread: "Are the equilibrium states governed by gravity?" Examples - An equilibrium state between the Sun and planets. - An equilibrium state between human body and the Earth. What I'm Familiar with so Far I am only familiar with stable, unstable, and maybe dynamic equilibrium state, there are maybe more states that I am not aware of. Reason The reason I asked the question is because it seems trying to understand the equilibrium states could lead to make an inference of how gravity work if the gravity is indeed responsible for the equilibrium states, I think.

Other discussions Okay. I'll look into other discussions if time permit. Question I have a question: Are the equilibrium states governed by gravity?

Afternoon, all. The adaptive semi-determinism or ASD is a concept conceived by myself in an attempt to define and explain the universal mechanism behind everything, or at least I think so. I thought I'd share about the ASD to all of you on here. I had hoped that by sharing about it, it could become more developed or evolved understanding via discussion between you and me. Unfortunately, it became apparent that I performed poorly of job with the definition and explanation for the ASD mechanism. As result of that, I have decided to discontinue my contribution to philosophy / science. It is clear that I have no place in either domains or fields. I wasted your time, for that I am sorry and won't bother any of you again. I wish you good luck with finding, proving, and putting the final theory to good use if there is any. Good day to all of you.

Sorry for the long reply. Think of ASD like Kernel used in Linux operating systems, a middle (drivers sort of) between hardware and software. That is kinda the best explanation I can could come up with atm.

Philosophical interpretation of and action with meaning.

ASD seems to sums it up. At least for me, so far. I "see" ASD kinda everywhere, perhaps interpreted to be understood probably for my way. But I thought I could share and contribute it. "Where to begin?" is the question I asked myself, to find an example. The picture is a perfect example of human(s) using (eg. including gravity, other factors) but I call it ASD, at a right condition (ASD is situational dependent) to construct that balanced rocks. But I could find more examples if you want. But though, I'm layman person. What is the ultimate beginning, middle, and inevitable destination of entities/objects/systems while in any equilibrium state as you said, also while in any type of relationship? Is there such an absolute and singular of entity/object/system that is absolutely independent of any type of relationship? Other comments: I still think ASD could be a concept construction by myself to define and explain the general mechanism of The Nature, in seemingly unified way regarding any type of relationship between objects/systems. Probably appropriated for my level of understanding. It is still important to see if ASD is right or wrong. For some reason I keep thinking ASD could be an inference of pattern by gravity or something like that. But though, I'm only layman person. I can't cognitize further beyond ASD, and into the intricate / complexity of science. This is my limitation.

https://pocket-syndicated-images.s3.amazonaws.com/5e90a389bb09e.jpg ^ A visual example of ASD result. [note 1 of 2: Originally found from reading an article - link: https://getpocket.com/explore/item/physics-needs-philosophy-philosophy-needs-physics?utm_source=pocket-newtab] [note 2 of 2: above 1st link - Photo by Dimitri Otis / Getty Images]

I'm neither a qualified scientist / mathematician nor expert. Idk. I'm a bit unsure whether if ASD is a concept construction based on a pattern or is a pattern that which I "see" kinda in something part of everywhere but then maybe it is just me. I guess I thought I could make use of it to solve two or more incompatible things or something like that. Call it a contribution of sort. If ASD is useless here, then I'll discuss ASD elsewhere where there might be more meaning to it. Thanks for participating.

Maybe ASD could be of tiny use: 'What is Quantum Gravity?' article, 'Is Quantum Gravity Proven?' section, dated March 21, 2018 - from: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-quantum-gravity-2699360 quote: "Attempts to combine them generally run into the "renormalization problem," in which the sum of all of the forces do not cancel out and result in an infinite value. In quantum electrodynamics, this happened occasionally, but one could renormalize the mathematics to remove these issues. Such renormalization does not work in a quantum interpretation of gravity." I'm wondering with a question as follow: Have you or anyone ever tried to use ASD to pit two or more incompatible theories against each other instead of combing both or more, to see what emerge as result? The theories could include General Relativity, Quantum Gravity, Quantum Theory, or other ones which I'm not aware about.

Here is a list of few ASD states to ascertain why it is wrong: ASD States: State 1 – Connection: For A and B or more to have a type of relationship between both or more, then both or more must establish a connection between both or more. State 2 – Change Process: For either A and B or more to be less or greater than sum of both or more, then both or more must undergo a change process toward an equilibrium. State 3 – Equilibrium: For A and B or more to be at equilibrium, then both or more must be equalized to each other. Note 1 of 3: A and B or more refer to objects and / or systems. Note 2 of 3: Connection refers to any type of connection (ie. any types of relationship). Note 3 of 3: The change process refers to all known actionable words or processes (eg. bonding, creating, forming, decaying, etc). Will you please explain which or even all states is/are wrong, an example of it being wrong, and why?

If ASD doesn’t, then maybe could it be used as a conceptual tool to understand any varying degree or type of relationship between objects/systems and another or other objects/systems in terms of real time and situational dependent?

Coherent actualization = makes real and sustained, or sustainability. By knowing that things tend to move toward equilibrium because of coherent actualization as potential reason why, we could use that to indicate which object(s) and / or system(s) that are in a process (forming, bonding, decaying, etc) toward equilibrium or at equilibrium (coherence or sustainability). An example: Heat flows from a hotter to a colder body as long there is a type of relationship being maintained between both [in a progression or "change"], once completed then both are at equilibrium (coherence or sustainability). Understanding sustainability is the key word. Take away a leg (an attribute) from a human being (atom). What do you think will happen? Or Give a superpower (an attribute) to a human being (atom). What do you think will happen? Additional definitions: Less or greater = a quantifiable value or visual / spatial measurement of an attribute, object, or system that is comparable to be less or greater than the sum of both or its parts. Sum of both (or sum of its parts) = An equalize between. Change = Any form of action or process. Level of Speed in Change = From slowest to fastest or instantaneous, or vice versa depending on situation.

Skipped? I didn't. In fact, I already stated why: quote 1: "ASD – Reason why behind ASD "Mechanism" Primary answer: Coherent actualization." quote 2: "I think it is the "ghost mechanism" with much needed name of it own (I used ASD as starting point), the mechanism responsible for the.. say, coherence or framework of reality. It is still kind of bit difficult to say what it is exactly is, but somehow my mind "see" it." quote 3: "If ASD is true, then yes. It must, there is no else way. The action of reaching an equilibrium seems to be the strict law (coherent reason), this means the atom must will undergo change (eg. Possible outcomes such as creation, formation, deformation, decay, etc as situational dependent) in the reaching process toward an equilibrium." Other comment: Coherent actualization seems to be best answer I can could come up with, but there could be some more research and understanding needed to address it.

A stable state could mean atoms reached equilibrium. Equilibrium = stable. Reduce and form = forms of change.

If ASD is true, then yes. It must, there is no else way. The action of reaching an equilibrium seems to be the strict law (coherent reason), this means the atom must will undergo change (eg. Possible outcomes such as creation, formation, deformation, decay, etc as situational dependent) in the reaching process toward an equilibrium.

Maybe does look alike. Generally speaking, A and b refer to any object and potentially any system too. 'Or more' refers to more objects or potentially systems too.

What I think ASD is An adaptive system. It is starting to look as if the ASD is a concept used to describe an adaptive system, for to deal with objects and their various types of relationships (including interactions) between each other in an adaptive way. Its mechanism is always toward equilibrium via averaged out or cancelling effect aka change itself, quoting: “When either a or b or more is less or greater than the sum of both or more, a change undergo between both or more until equilibrium is reached.” The ‘change’ function of an adaptive system, quoting: “... This statement could means ASD is occurring itself (create / form / deform / decay / etc). The ‘change’ function within ASD context describes creation, formation, deformation, decay, etc - the transition or transformation between. How is ASD useful? Maybe ASD could be useful in a further improvement and / or understanding of an energy mechanism, formation and decaying of matter, the transition between phases of matter (solid, liquid, gas, plasma), and decision or choice making in either philosophy or psychology field, and evolution in biology.

Ok, I will put ToE (and GR / QT) aside for now, and talk about just ASD on this post. Expansion of Elaboration on ASD “Mechanism”: 1 - “Adaptive semi-determine between a and b or more toward equilibrium.” and: 2 - “When either a or b or more is less or greater than the sum of both or more, a change undergo between both or more until equilibrium is reached.” I said ASD is the ghost mechanism. Because it is not there as a separated entity but “is there” when things meet or have a form of relationship with each other. When there is no any form of relationship in existence (eg. Between / in-between sub-atomic particles), then no universe (no relativity, no relation, no relative, etc). So, I guess.. to understand ASD better, is to understand the nature of relationship and its forms (including terminologies such as relativity, relation, relative, etc). The learning process (from gradual slow to fast or vice versa) is a perfect example of ASD relationship at work: How do one experience and acquire knowledge? One must have something external outside of himself / herself / itself such as an universe, to experience what it is like and what to do with it. One and universe, a form of relationship. Without universe, how does one know anything when there is nothing or zero example to set forth for one to gain an experience and understand? Law example in use: Adaptive semi-determine between experience (a) and understanding (b) toward knowledge (equilibrium). I interpret equilibrium as not just a state of balanced system between two or more, but also as end-result product (a coherent or defined shape and form of something). This statement could means ASD is occurring itself (create / form / deform / decay / etc). I’m not fully sure, but the ASD could be the mechanism behind all fundamental interactions. Because rest of fundamental interactions are essentially relationships between (eg. Atoms, sub-particles, planets, solar systems, etc) and ASD seems to be the natural definition of relationship of all, at least how I see it. With the above on mind, one have to remember it is situational dependent. While everything seemingly is asding, some things can be good or bad or neutral depending on situational dependent. 3 - “Since if the ASD is true then that means some things while asding can be perceived to be good, bad, or neutral as situational dependent.” A few examples as follow: Good: Positive Learning Process Clean and Safe Environment Natural Healthy Human Body Bad: Virus Cancer Sickness Neutral: Not on a side On fence between sides Perceivable as no apparent form of relationship between something and another something The ASD is based on an inference made by myself, from some patterns in everyday life. I’m just pointing it out and while it is true I talked at lengthy about it now and in past, but that still don’t mean I fully know it. There could be much more experience and understanding needed to actualize knowledge about it.

I think it is the "ghost mechanism" with much needed name of it own (I used ASD as starting point), the mechanism responsible for the.. say, coherence or framework of reality. It is still kind of bit difficult to say what it is exactly is, but somehow my mind "see" it. You are talking mathematics. The ASD proposal is still at abstract or philosophical concept stage, a starting point that perhaps there might will be mathematics formed to define and explain it. However, I'm no scientist or mathematician - I'm just posting the ASD thing so maybe you or someone might could understand what I am talking about and maybe come up with math proof of its existence or something like that. I said ASD could be understood better and used as application to understand both general relativity and quantum theory. I don't really know details behind both GRT and QT and still don't. But.. my mind 'see' ASD as a way of bridging between both and potentially much more for some reason. Without philosophy as root, no science.

Introduction The ASD is an acronym for Adaptive Semi-Determinism, which will be defined and explained starting on next section. I made threads or topics regarding the ASD thing on other sites in past, but nearly have forgotten all about it until today. The reason for this topic is that I noticed there is no concrete case (eg. Being complete) of unified theory of everything (ToE) of everything to define and explain everything or even each individual sentient being for that matter due to qualia or freewill. For any action such as an act of smoking a cigarette overrides the logic reasoning, thus existence of freewill. Yet, we can be influenced by our genes effected by consumable food, drink, communication, environment, history, belief, etc – thus freewill is in question. The existence of contradiction between these two things, but how do both mutually work out apart from each other and / or even altogether as demonstrated on daily basis? The answer could be ASD. ASD - Definition ASD stands for Adaptive Semi-Determinism. It bridges both determinism and in-determinism concepts, to solve the duality problem or multi-concepts that are mutually incompatible with each other. The ASD is a concept, a non-material structure and function. It is not there but “is there” when things meet or have a form of relationship with each other. It “solves” and / or “resolves” things as per situational dependent, making these “appropriated” as these are (eg. particle/wave duality). ASD – “Mechanism” Law: Adaptive semi-determine between a and b or more toward equilibrium. When either a or b or more is less or greater than the sum of both or more, a change undergo between both or more until equilibrium is reached. Since if the ASD is true then that means some things while asding can be perceived to be good, bad, or neutral as situational dependent. ASD – Reason why behind ASD “Mechanism” Primary answer: Coherent actualization. ASD – Examples Equalizer. Differentiation. Equilibrium of human body, solar systems, galaxies, etc. How can ASD be useful (eg. Being applicable)? Snipped quote from ToE wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything “To resolve the incompatibility, a theoretical framework revealing a deeper underlying reality, unifying gravity with the other three interactions, must be discovered to harmoniously integrate the realms of general relativity and quantum mechanics into a seamless whole: the TOE is a single theory that, in principle, is capable of describing all phenomena in the universe.” A further understanding of ASD could potentially solve / resolve the incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics, not just that but also could be useful in other fields such as philosophy, psychology, etc. Other Thoughts The ASD just seems to make sense at least to me. I just thought I’d share it because it might be helpful, if not then its better than nothing.

Table of Contents Introduction Concepts – Part 1 of 2: Basics Space Location Direction Energy Goal Time Concepts – Part 2 of 2: Understanding The Linear Space-Time Linear Space-Time Limitations of Linear Space-Time Prediction Time Travel Conclusion Introduction This is about understanding the linear space-time worldview or paradigm and why it is limited. It is partial correct, but not a complete one at that. We will start off with basics that make up the linear space-time concept then point out its limitations. Concept - Part 1 of 2: Basics Space Definition: The space throughout the spacetime in this universe, is conceptually a spatial and “empty container” that “holds”/”indicate” a location that occupy it. Example: A male human being as location himself occupying a spatial location in space area at his home. Location Definition: A location is something with a position in space, usually with a classification or identification (eg. Being known). Example: Position A (human being). Position B (home). Position C (work). Direction Definition: Direction is something that transforms its position to another one, usually in a forwarding manner. Example: A human being drove (transformed) from his home (eg. Position A) to work (eg. Position B). Energy Definition: A source of available and useable something for a transformative action, usually for transforming a position to another one in either physical or conceptual sense. Example: A human being driving (transforming) a car with gas or electrical battery (energy) from his home (position A) to work (position B). Goal Definition: A potential result, usually affixed with a meaning that can dicate an action of transforming a position to another one. Example: A human being driving his car to work (position B) from home (position A), with a goal of contributing and earning something (goal). Relation Definition: A comparable of two or more physical or conceptual objects, that are connected to each other in a way. Example: Human being going from his home event (eg. position A) to work event (eg. position B). Relatable frames of event (eg. Frame A and Frame B). Linear Definition: Linear is either almost or absolutely straight line that goes forward from a position (eg. A) to another position (eg. B), or a logical sequence of steps between position a and b in any direction. Example: A human being went to work (position B) from his home (position A), both positions connected as beginning and end or linear travel. Time Definition: The time is a tool and conceptual measurement of a passage between events and human experience. Example: Human being arrived at his home from his work and looked at his wrist watch with a timeclock, to check and / or measure his experience of the day. Concept Part 2 of 2: Understanding The Linear Space-Time Linear Space-Time Definition: A sequential continuation of a meaningful event to another one and so on, in a fixed forwarding manner. Usually with a beginning and end in either physical or conceptual sense. Example: Position A (home – event 1) to position B (work – event 2). The linear space-time is an event going from its prior event to a next another one. It is usually marked as a frame on mind of human being in a logical step-by-step, for making a correlation and reference. The perception of linear space-time is result of “non-linear” thinking by mind of human. The reason is for that is to turn something into a defined, fixed, or static idea or thing in order to make a “necessary” correlation for a re-visit or reference. By having a linear space-time in either physical (eg. Time clock device) or conceptual sense; a linear history, goal, and / or meaning is created and preserved, usually because of an emphasis of importance or value is placed upon on it. Limitations of Linear Space-Time Static Limitation 1: The linear space-time concept being applied in almost everywhere, yields static ideas or materials whereas the Nature yields a real-time universe. Inheritance Limitation 2: The static nature of linear space-time concept, it inherently creates a number of frames in an animation or live real-time scene or event for correlation and reference. The frames require usage of extra energy to update it and can potentially take up extra space. Precision Limitation 3: The frame as byproduct of linear space-time concept, it can create a lag, delay, or a gap between numbers of it; that may pose a problem because it don’t seem to paint a precise picture of the Nature. Prediction While prediction is for attempting to make a projection of a future idea of something, we have to remember it is based on the linear space-time concept. Example: A to B, a beginning and end whereas the Nature or real world is real-time where anything can change it. Thus the prediction is only a relative approximate. Time Travel The time travel seems to be possible in a fiction work such as films, novels, and other media forms because of the linear space-time worldview and an ability to hack it. The time travel is impossible. We cannot go forward or backward in time, because time is a linear concept to indicate or measure the passage between events and experience; nothing more or less wheras the Nature is “real-time” or live universe. Conclusion Basically the linear space-time is a partial snapped picture of the Nature, but not a whole of it. The linear space-time concept is a fixed one at that, sometimes it is good for framing something (eg. An idea) that holds true or having a connection of sort for a human being’s subjective experience and re-visit. Usually because of an importance or value place upon on it. The linear space-time concept is visibly presented in almost everywhere apart from the Nature. Unfortunately, it is limited and paints a partial worldview of the world or universe. The static limitation chain-created a few limitations that likely posed some problems, mainly because these are in contrast with the natural real-time that is characteristic of the Nature. How to make a real-time measurement to obtain an accurate reading or information about the Nature? I do not know except maybe it could be the rate of using energy. An example: A cat lived up to eighteen years old by human standard years (linear space-time worldview), but if we could measure the energy rate by cat before it died; we might find out whether if it actually lived a long or short “time”. By removing the time away from the measurement equation, we could then measure it on something by just the “real-time” energy rate to obtain a more accurate information about life experienced by it. The resulting information itself might be still linear but still, we have to remember that it along with the linear space-time is still limited. With being said about the limitations of linear space-time concept, we need to start looking into some potential and alternative solutions to the linear paradigm of space-time in order to be more correct with the Nature or universe.

"Quantum correlation can imply causation (Update)" http://phys.org/news/2015-03-quantum-imply-causation.html I changed my mind about asymmetrical and symmetrical energies. I just realized that the asymmetrical energy implies pure random and magic. So it is unacceptable. Also the asymmetrical energy as chaos cannot exist at first place by itself in absolute sense. Chaos is merely a word describing something that is seemingly complex and random. But chaos is actually the product of causality. It might be the symmetrical energy that caused the causality at first place. "in" the symmetrical energy, the amount and type of energy is kind of unknown to me, I only could say it is kinda omnipotent. If it is omnipotent, it could "mechanically" produce infinite number of possibilities (eg chaos, etc). Anyway, I'm sure the more I learn about quantum mechanics I might will change my mind. Have a good day, guys.