ogmios

My father used to laugh at the funny theories of Einstein; the most ludicrous residing within Relativity. The Universe stands for everything and everything cannot expand into itself, for that would not be an expansion. There would have to be something else out there to expand into, beyond three dimensional space. And since we would be expanding it to it, it would have to be bigger than 3d space, so we would have to redefine Universal to mean less than half of everything. I have performed 3d graphics for too many years on computers and I have developed an innate ability to visualize in 3d accurately. If you are expanding all of three dimensional space, it would include all the space that mass inhabits. You would never notice any space difference between two object; everything scales; even what ever symbolic means of measuring you chose to use. It is easy to prove this wrong with a simple graphing out of path a laser would take when traveling from the Earth to the Moon. First you need to understand the movement Earth traverses. We spin, counterclockwise. We rotate around the sun counterclockwise. The solar system spins clockwise around the Milky Way. And the Milky Way travels around a super galactic spin. In all we are traveling at a rate of over 700 miles per second. So if you pointed a laser at the moon, it would take over a second to get there. In that second the point of origin and the point of destination would have moved over 700 miles away from where they were. So the light would not be traveling in a straight line, it would be curved in 4 different directions. It would still appear as straight to us on Earth because we would be traveling with the same momentum as the light. You could say light travels in a line of momentum. It is a miracle that curiosity survives a formal education.In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Perfection of means and confusion of ends seems to characterize our age. To punish me for my contempt for authority, fate made me an authority myself. Albert Einstein there I posted it correctly link removed

Superconductivity is misunderstood as well as misnamed by science. Tests were done at White Sands, thatindicate semiconductors are superconducting when the atoms are in North-to-South alignment. This is a new state of matter, similar to solid liquid gaseous and plasma; a state of alignment. This state is an example of the Science of Harmonics or Sympathetic Vibrations; for we either have atomic content working together and creating one larger EMF field or they are not in harmonic cooperation and have many separate smaller EMF fields competing with each other. We know the electron always go in the south pole of an EMF field and exits the north end. So when superconducting the path an electron takes is straight through. When not in alignment the path is not only longer, it has to make directional changes and there is lots of friction and contact; hence electron loss is turned into heat. More importantly when superconducting there is only one EMF field to traverse as opposed to many. Imagine computers made with aligned matter as opposed to semiconductors, there would be no heat sinks needed and they would go much faster. But we can take this state to the next level for it gives us a idea how gravity fields work as well as how to make small gravity fields for space travel. Knowing that Earth has a very large EMF field or gravity field and that these fields are created by harmonic alignment, one has to ask what on Earth or maybe what in Earth is in alignment? It cannot be the mantel, nor the outer core, since these layers are anything but pure. So we traverse down to the inner core of Nickel and Iron. Super compressing and thus super heating these elements seem to create alignment and our EMF field. Why these elements make it to the bottom and others do not must be due to their elliptical obits, that force alignment when compressed. Roger Bacon apparently understood the principal of the alignment of the atomic content to produce a gravity field. In his book Opus Tertium, in which he discusses "the alignment of the poles in recreating the gravitational pull of the Earth.” If you would like to read the manuscript online it can be found here. link removed woops wrong title was suposed to be superconductivity SORRY