kyle465

I wasn't planning on it, i'm more trying to figure out why it's wrong through questions like these. Thank you for the response. I mean has a physical reason been observed rather than a mathematical conclusion. I'm asking have the particles actually been looked at to see if they undergo physical change while moving at relativistic speeds, not after they have collided with another particle.

Wouldn't it make more sense imagining a black hole's mass gravity simply tearing spacetime and basically acting as a portal to a higher dimension? When you look at gravity displayed virtually, it's usually as a bend in spacetime, and spacetime is represented as a 2d plane. So naturally, a dip in that plane would require another dimension. Couldn't the mass gravity of a black hole simply curve spacetime so much that it tears the fabric of our dimensions and opens up a way into a higher dimension? I find the idea of an infinite curvature to be harder to imagine. Also, wouldn't a singularity put a limit on how much matter a black hole could consume? If the hole converges to a point, where is all the matter going that it is consuming?

Hello I have a question about relativistic mass. All i'm wondering, which I can't seem to find anywhere else, is: Has a reason been found for why the mass of particles at relativistic speeds increases? Have scientists actually observed particles while they are moving at those speeds and seen something added (or nothing added) to the particle as it's moving? Or are they particles being moved to fast to observe? I'm wondering because I have a theory about the reason for the mass increase. Please let me know if what i'm asking is unclear because i'm bad at articulation.