kos

If something happen due to entanglement it wkukd be only once

So if we do some change on B via A it will be just once because this change will destroy entenglement for next event

So if I move the first pawn that will not affect the second pawn since they are entangled If I determine the spin of first groups s of particles it will determine automaticly the second part wich will corespond to some causal chain reaction wich will unlock some action that the object will do wich of two assumptions is more correct

The light speed is not the key point in my question. Let it be within the time needed for light speed reach the other pawn .

Let's say we have two identical pawns . The coresponding composing particles of both are in perfect entanglement. We play chess on the board and move the first on F2 and on the other side of the world the second one pawn wich is part from another game moves for its own as the player dont know the connection between them and he is shocked !

So first I gonna show you this article http://www.gizmag.com/quantum-entanglement-nuclei-university-chicago-argonne/40884/ . The natural question arising in my mind is the imaginable situation With two objects. Both with the same number of composing particles and the same structure. Both in perfect entanglement between their corresponding internal structures. So we move them appart we exegerate control over one and the second object behaves the same way. It coppy the movement of fist object wich movevemnt we control . I imagine some sort of puppet-playing . Comment it ,please !

If you have composition from entangled particles and you can put some control for the first part of them does it mean that you auomaticly can control the behavior of the second part?

Does the absorption and emission spectrum for some element are the same .Do the molecules and atoms emit in the same spectrum they absorb em radiation? If yes how we can explain black color since black materials obviously absorb all the incoming light and re emit it in some other wavelenght ?

What can cause disentanglement of the system. Could it happen even random?

My main question is still there. What if the invistigated object is the emitter?

Yes I have asked e exaclty the same .But gas as everything around us radiates naturally in infrared,microwave,radio or any other type of frequency depending on the temperature . So if the temperature of some volume of air is higher than the temperature around this volume because for instance the first volume is constantly warmed by some some source of heat as fire , then if we look trhough microwave remote sensing camera or thermal imaging one we will see the difference in brightness bwteen both regions. So if somebody talks you can probably see the disturbance cause by the speech as a wave pattern by the natural emissivity of the hotter air.I use hotter and colder regions of air in relavence of each other because the hotter spot can be easly distinguishable from the rest of the surrounding medium wich temperature is expected to be in almost the same interval and the emmission of the objects from medium would be difficult for deffentiate since their temperature are close to each other and so their electromagnetic emission should be almost the same but not in comparison of the much warmer object as flame from the candle

I coppy paste from other site my question I have asked there but without proper answer ! 1Thank you. I know a little bit for this idea but I asked because in the case of my question it is not the objcet that we imaging illuminated by the light from some source like in the video with light bulb but it is the emitter it is the source of light itself.Hot air realising its hotness in a manner of electromagnetic radiation is the direct source of incoming light into the focus of camera. Would it this method still be applicable?

0 down vote favorite Can you see sound wave propagating trhough very hot air (500 -1000 degree celcius ) Why so much ? To be more distinguishable than a natural emitters since everything we know emits some radiation if it is over absoulute zero temperature.So if you look at the air by infrared or even microwave camera. I suppose that somebody will see direclty the propagation of the changing pressure as acoustic wave. If we can imagine for instance how it looks sound propagating in water and we can directly see the changes of pressure so it should be the same case with the air. But it is difficult to see the sound wave direclty with a naked eye as air is transperant for wavelenghts of visible light where is our visible perception. So if we look trhough the objective of a infrared camera we will detect the emitted not reflected radiation as it is the case of our natural perceotion. So when the sound wave propagates trhough medium in our case air and since we can see the emission of infrared radiation easily of our medium (air) so I suppose we will see direclty by the infrared camera the sound ! Am I correct ?

So we have the discovery of gravitational waves confirmed. Does it mean that if we have sophisticated measuring stuff and highly advanced equipment we can perform unique accurate imaging of any object ( atom by atom in details ) by the signatures that any of its component parts rest in spacetime lattice in terms of gravitational wave ?

Is there something like zero time. What does it mean. Prove it in nature . What would be the consequence of existence of this kind of time. For instance you can say hey zero time is at the verry begining of the universe. The moment of creation . The big bang . But it is not clear is there a creation at all and what if for instance the universe have existed forever. So in the second scenario there is no zero time.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2835426/https://news.osu.edu/news/2015/09/14/youre-not-irrational-youre-just-quantum-probabilistic/ the first suggest the opposite of second . What is the bigger true ?

So in one respect psycologically there is a theory that brain is evolutionary proceeding overconfidence as a survival mode. Any our assumption is under that condition . In the other respect we now know that in the brain microtubules the scientists found quantum vibrational modes. So if the quantum mechanics is obeyd by the kingdom of uncertanity so how it is possible our brain to proceed the first process of overconfidence ?

Main infrared atmospheric window is between 8 - 14 um . So that's the region of spectrum where the atmosphere is transparent.That's why our Earth cools down a little bit. Does it mean that the major band of emissivity of most of earth's matter is in the region of the window ( 8-14 um )

What is the corresponding frequency of AC that is generated in bones due to their piezoelectric properties when is applied acoustic pressure in the frequency range of human voice for instance ?

".......Actual resolution is limited by atmospheric turbulence, well known for its degradation of astronomical seeing. The good news for spy satellites is that turbulence close to the object and far from the camera isn't as disruptive as turbulence close to the telescope. That's a good thing, because adaptive optics don't work as well for large-area images as they do for small astronomical objects..... " I found that as I read article about reading newspaper from space via surveillance satellites. So is that true about atmospherical seeing from above.Is it less and can someone tell exactly how much less would it decrease for instance if we are trying do monitoring from space down to earth through atmosphere . Let suppose that the angle of view is zenith angle for practical purposes. I don't ask because I'm concerned to privacy but as real scientific question cuz I'm trying to understand how atmospehric blurring disturb the original image in astronomy . Im studying now about telescope and looking for possibilities for other exoplanets as Earth.And curiosity makes me ask if this is the case with atmospheric seeing because if it is so it would be much more easier to look through alien atmospheres as we look from above similary to spy satellites looking on Earth So does astronomical seeing decrease and how much if we look at a straight line (zenith angle)down to Earth through atmosphere from above ? Thank you in advance

So on theory If I go close to an antenna take a loadspeaker and start screaming I will change the original RF signal that the antenna would emit

and what If they are . What does it mean . Would the signal emitted from the antenna differ from the original that should be if there was no applies in sense of vibration.

How will additional vibration of sound affect the electromagnetic wave emited from the antenna ?

So sounds crazy but disregarding the different nature of thoose 2 kinds of waves , what would happen when they are propagating in the same medium. From quantum mechanical prespective for instance do the two wavefunctions interact each other someway. What would be the result . Or let me simplify my question . What is going to be if you talk to an antenna since it carries some EM radio waves and you add it your acoustic vibrations ?

That is something nice thank you Scientist )))))