Koni

How much different DNA Bases could you make using only pyrimidines???... The answer is only 4 !!! This is only a strange coincidence which make you to think about it...

I don't say that Evolution is wrong!!!... But why - could we ask then - is there NOT only ONE Base pair ( = 2 Bases) enough???... But why - could we ask then - are today by Synthetic Biology THREE Base pairs ( = 6 Bases) possible???... My sugestion is only a possible answer why the only Bases are GC and AT... ( THANK YOU for your comments!!!...)

Why have we only 4 DNA Bases on Earth and NOT the theoretical possible 12 DNA Bases???... Life on Earth has only 2 DNA Base pairs... (2 * 2 = 4 Bases) Theoretical there could be 6 DNA Base pairs of pyrimidines and purines!!!... (6 * 2 = 12 Bases) My sugestion is that if Life evolved from only pyrimidines and NOT purines, then they are only 2 DNA Base pairs possible!!! (image)

My Triple DNA Bases model based on modified pyrene(C16H10) molecules has a issue with "Tautomerism" !!! (First Image) So, I had to include the Tautomerism into my design !!! (Second Image)

It could achieve an alternative to the "DOUBLE Helix DNA" molecule... It could be used to store Information... It could be an "Alien" DNA somewhere out there...

I have drawn 2 molecules of triple DNA Bases... Each Base is a DOUBLE-Base... The 6 DOUBLE-Bases connects together in one and only one possible way to make 2 triplets!!!... The 2 triplet Bases could be part of the core of a "TRIPLE Helix DNA" ...

Hello, I have imagined and drawn two molecules of TRIPLE Helix DNA Bases (image)... ( In the image the backbones of the three sugar/phospate Helices is NOT shown...) There has to be only ONE possible way to connect the 6 DOUBLE-Bases into two separate triplets... Can anyone who knows Organic-Chemistry tell me if I have made any MISTASKES by my design???... IF my molecules fullfiles aromatic criteria???...

They are three(3) Nucleobases... Each Base connects with the other two Bases, with three(3) Hydrogen Bonds... There is only ONE possible way to connect them together... So..., IF you know one base and its orientation THEN you know also which the other two bases are!!!...

Look at the webside: http://www.chessvariants.com/multiplayer.dir/treyshah.html He plays wrong the Knight and the pawns!!!... But his Hexagon Chessboard is great!!!... I made it after 20 years when I First saw it in a magazine... Now I cannot find again the NERO RED chesspieces...

I have made this Hexagonal Chess for three players... The inventor of the chessboard was Matt Seaburry... (In the First Line he had only 4 pawns) The Knight moves: one Hexagon like the Rook and then one Hexagon like the Bishop... or one Hexagon like the Bishop and then one Hexagon like the Rook... The pawns move in two directions: or forward-right or forward-left...

We have 20 amino acids… Each of them can be written with ONE letter: A=Alanine B=… C=Cysteine D=Aspartic acid E=Glutamic acid F=Phenylalanine G=Glycine H=Histidine I=Isoleucine J=… K=Lycine L=Leucine M=Methionine N=Asparagine O=… P=Proline Q=Glutamine R=Arginine S=Serine T=Threonine U=… V=Valine W=Tryptophane X=… Y=Tyrosine Z=… B, J, O, U, X, Z are the 6 letters from the English alphabet which are not been used… We can add this 6 letters to 6 amino acids: A/B =Alanine I/J =Isoleucine N/O =Asparagine U/V =Valine W/X =Tryptophane Y/Z =Tyrosine Now we can write a message-Letter with amino acids… We can translate it in DNA code… We can copy it 22 times in each chromosome where the “junk DNA” is… So, we can leave a message to our descendants on the DNA !!! After generations you can track the copies of this message and see if it is readable !!!

THANK You for this Information!!!... I will look in the Internet for it...

Have you another proposition for a molecule which can store information like the DOUBLE Helix DNA is???...

IF there were a TRIPLE Helix DNA it were no differencies as to Organisms with a DOUBLE Helix DNA because they store INFORMATION in the same way!!!... The only difference is by the m-RNA's and t-RNA's... By a TRIPLE Helix with three (3/3) nucleobases you have: or (1) m-RNA=1/3 and t-RNA=2/3... or (2) m-RNA=2/3 and t-RNA=1/3 ...

There is a Theoretical and Hypothetical real TRIPLE Helix DNA with three(3) nucleotide Bases which I have posted... This is the only alternative to the DOUBLE Helix DNA which has Hydrogen Bonds...

The only question is if they could possible exist somewhere in the univerce???...

How are some Animals Transparent???... How get the Light through ist tissues???... What are the physical characteristics of this tissues???... The Transparent Lences of our Eyes have inside the cells no nucleus...

I have access only to Biology Books from "Sinauer" and "Amazon"... I don't know if I can find GOOD Biology Books elsewhere... (???)

THANK You very-very much for your answers and your Help !!! Can you please propose me a good Book about Biology or about Evolution???... I have read the: EVOLUTION from Douglas J.Futuyma Denying Evolution form Massimo Pigliucci and other Books from "Sinauer"... THANK You Have a nice Day - every Day!!!...

I did NOT understand the last one: "Note that evolutionism is never used in the Scientific Community" WHAT do you mean with "evolutionism"???... The theory of Evolution???... Sorry, that I have a lot of questions... I have read a lot of Greek+German+English Books about Biology and about Evolution... But I am NOT a Biology Student... I only Like reading about Life !!!

Can you read please my above reply and answer me WHY all the Biology Books write about Microevolution and Macroevolution???... (Not only the Kreatonists but the Evolutionists also...)

The Triple Helix DNA is unique like the Double Helix DNA... There are no other ways to store Information with Hydrogen-Bonds!!!... To store INFORMATION the Bases have to join together with only one way!!!... They can be other DNA-Molecules like with Hydrogen Bonds but they cannot store Information...

I understand very well that it is only EVOLUTION and not micro-meso-macro... But in all the Biology Books they write about micro-evolution and macro-evolution... 1a) micro-evolution is evolution inside a group of organisms which make SEX together... (anagenesis) 1b) macro-evolution is evolution between two(2) separeted groups which don't make SEX together... (kladogenesis) 2a) micro-evolution is evolution of an organism to another NEW organism with the same body-architectur... (from a frog species to another NEW frog species) 2b) macro-evolution is evolution of an organism to another NEW organism with a different NEW body-architectur... (from a amphibian species to another NEW reptile species) So, we can add the aboves to: micro-evolution = 1a meso-evolution = 1b = 2a macro-evolution = 2b So, with the above... from the common ancestor of Humans and Apes (australopithecus) to the Homo-Sapiens and Chimpanzees is it microevolution - macroevolution or mesoevolution???... IF we Look at the same features it is meso-evolution... IF we Look at the different features it is macro-evolution... I understand that it is only EVOLUTION !!! But I have to ask... THANK You !!!

From the ancestor of Apes and Humans...

The Evolution of Humans is Micro-evolution, Meso-evolution or Macro-evolution???...