Anon_Ghost

If you are saying that passing grades are more important than a smarter society I must disagree. I thought this was a site for the scientific community not a site for schools...If what I am saying is wrong then tell me why, if what I am saying is right support my theory. I stand my ground but I will stop trying to explain myself and continue my unappreciated work.

ok I understand the "posting in multiple threads" thing but I originally wrote this to help this young mans understanding. So what you are saying by moving all my posts to speculation is that I am wrong, correct? PROVE IT!!! I'd love to see you try! Explain how you are going to bend time to LITERALLY travel back and forth in time...back to the question originally asked, if you want the answer go to speculation/trash that's where the moderators send the real answers...

Okay so I guess that post's about Aliens, black holes, or any theory, hell all of science belongs in speculation! I noted proof supporting my theory, as already found by Steven Hawking and NASA, and still I am tossed to the side like a piece of trash while articles with much less proof remain. I am saddened by this deeply as I was hoping to meet the scientific community with open minds and not with hateful moderators...but my work will continue and as always I encourage you to poke holes in my theory's, that's what it's all about!

I originally wrote this in reply to a "scientist" minded individual that WAS confused. I am in complete favor of science and in no way am I trying to deny it! But when you leave the realm of reality to try and make things fit into place you are doing no more science than a child with toys! Science is the ultimate truth! It has no room for misunderstanding and it's truth takes no ones feelings into consideration. Relativity does NOT mean: the way you see it is the way it is. Relativity does NOT prove: that time is anything other than what it has always been, a measurement. It does not prove that time can be altered in any way other than that I have described(which isn't alteration it's just...relative)...I don't think you fully read my article...maybe before taking offence you should fully read a scientific discovery, and do so with an open mind, before dismissing it as "speculation". This article has more proof, realism, and scientific implications than any article suggesting black holes as a time traveling device! But go ahead and jump in one to find out! Maybe you should read my White Hole/Black Hole Cycle Theory in astronomy and cosmology after re-reading this article and see if i'm not starting to make sense to you...

I believe we can find an understanding for black holes. If we are to believe, in scientific terms, that you cannot get something for nothing, then we must conclude that black holes are nothing mystical or magical only compressed matter with a gravitational force strong enough to hold light within it's atmosphere. I believe neutron stars and black holes are very similar with the differences being stability and gravitational strength. The next question is whether or not these black holes have a mass limit. The answer seems to me to be an obvious yes and if we assume it to be true we can come up with some (third)eye opening theories! If a black hole reached a maximum mass limit before it's own gravity caused it to collapse, then the result is a White Hole! A white hole is the opposite of the black hole, scattering matter across space in a short length of time(in comparison to the time it takes to fall into a black hole). Previously thought to be a one time event(big bang), I believe these white holes are quite frequent, in terms relative to the universe, and act as a kind of piston for the creation and expansion of the universe! As evidence I present GRB 060614 detected by NASA's Swift Satellite on June 14th 2006, A supernova that left a black hole(not a neutron star) in its spot, the event lasted 102 seconds! I also present Steven Hawking's discovery of Hawking Radiation. This radiation, caused by particles falling into the black hole, can be used to explain how a black hole can reach it's maximum without pulling all the matter it ejected back within itself. Thus letting stars drift far away from the black hole to someday create their own black hole, ever expanding the universe. This is not plagiarized material! These are original thoughts and conclusions drawn from the theories of the great minds before me. I owe credit to Steven Hawking(Hawking Radiation), and NASA(satellite documentation). This theory is my own and may be quoted for discussion or school use. I ask that any such quote or any future findings based on the "Weninger Universe Model" to give me credit for my discovery. The White Hole/Black Hole Cycle Theory is only one component of the Weninger Universe Model, used in terms of explaining creation and expansion through black hole/white hole's piston-like behavior, and their ability to reproduce. -James Weninger WH Explained 3.bmp

I believe we can find an understanding for black holes. If we are to believe that, in scientific terms, you cannot get something for nothing, then we must conclude that black holes are nothing mystical or magical only compressed matter with a gravitational force strong enough to hold light within it's atmosphere. I believe neutron stars and black holes are very similar with the differences being stability and gravitational strength. The next question is whether or not these black holes have a mass limit. The answer seems to me to be an obvious yes and if we assume it to be true we can come up with some (third)eye opening theories! If a black hole reached a maximum mass limit before it's own gravity caused it to collapse, then the result is a White Hole! A white hole is the opposite of the black hole, scattering matter across space in a short length of time(in comparison to the time it takes to fall into a black hole). Previously thought to be a one time event(big bang), I believe these white holes are quite frequent, in terms relative to the universe, and act as a kind of piston for the creation and expansion of the universe! As evidence I present GRB 060614 detected by NASA's Swift Satellite on June 14th 2006, A supernova that left a black hole(not a neutron star) in its spot, the event lasted 102 seconds! I also present Steven Hawking's discovery of Hawking Radiation. This radiation, caused by particles falling into the black hole, can be used to explain how a black hole can reach it's maximum without pulling all the matter it ejected back within itself. Thus letting stars drift far away from the black hole to someday create their own black hole, ever expanding the universe. This is not plagiarized material! These are original thoughts and conclusions drawn from the theories of the great minds before me. I owe credit to Steven Hawking(Hawking Radiation), and NASA(satellite documentation). This theory is my own and may be quoted for discussion or school use. I ask that any such quote or any future findings based on the "Weninger Universe Model" to give me credit for my discovery. The White Hole/Black Hole Cycle Theory is only one component of the Weninger Universe Model, used in terms of explaining creation and expansion through black hole/white hole's piston-like behavior, and their ability to reproduce. -James Weninger

I believe our interpretation of Relativity needs to be simplified. Time travel is not LITERAL it is figurative. In Steven Hawking's "Briefer History Of Time" he uses the analogy of a man bouncing a ping pong ball on a train to describe relativity. The man on the train bounces the ball, and from his point of relativity it bounces in the same spot twice. A man standing along the rails though would see the ball bounce in two different spots from his point of relativity. The realization of relativity, found by Einstein, was that both men were right! The ball had bounced in the same spot on the train, but the train was in two different spots as the time between bounces transpired. To fully understand this one must use what I like to call the "God View" where one can pause/FF/rewind time while zooming in and out to fully understand what transpired(like the view one has while running a simulation). Relativity has confused many scientists who, encouraged by Steven Hawking, believe that time is curved and can be manipulated by speed. This is false. Relativity is the understanding that when you conduct an experiment your observations will be relative to the scale at which you observe! Zoom in and you may see a ball bouncing in the same spot, then zoom out and you realize that the trains speed changes the location of the spot as time moves forward, and the results of your experiment change. I predict that if one were to zoom in on the inner workings of a clock you would find that they are effected by gravity, so as you increase/decrease the gravitational pull on the clock the time between ticks will change effectively fooling humanity into believing they had just went forward/backward in time, like the guy on the train. Time is a measurable dimension that is constant and consistent. Time Travel is commonly thought of in it's literal form such as a time machine, or relativity's twist on this using a space ship traveling faster than light. These are both fictitious. Time travel is not LITERALLY possible, however it is RELATIVELY possible! Have I got you confused yet? LOL! Relatively speaking when we look at a star 4 light years away(Proxima Centauri) we are seeing 4 years into it's past because it's light takes 4 years to reach our eyes. If we were flying in a space ship at the speed of light twords the star we would have witnessed 8 years of the stars history in 4 years, and thus we would have relatively "fast forwarded" in time. The God View however would be able to see the lights long journey to earth, watched the space shuttle travel twords the star and all things would happen in sequence without any disruption or "singularities". Now we should have a common understanding of "Relativity's" meaning, so lets talk about realistic time travel. In order to bring this into the realm of universal understanding I am going to use our Galaxy as the point of the topic, however once grasped it makes one wonder about the implications once the whole body of the Universe is taken into account! A Solar System is the area in which planets orbit a star. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is filled with solar systems approximated by NASA to be some tens of billions. NASA places our solar system somewhere about halfway between our black hole and the outer rim of the galaxy. Taking into consideration the long term scale on which galactic events happen, one could imagine that just as our planet evolved so to must other, much older, planets have evolved. A solar system with conditions similar to ours, and nearer to the black hole, would have had the chance to produce life long before our planet was anything more than dust. Therefore, if the planet's lifeforms had discovered science, their lifeforms would most likely have escaped their planet before it's eventual doom and effectively became a space faring species! If we traveled twords this species space station and learned to communicate(given they are peaceful) we would have relatively traveled to the future, learning all kinds of technologies from these beings. Because our Galaxy is roughly 100,000 Light Years across(NASA) we can say that if we were observing this planet we would be seeing about 50,000 years into it's past, possibly before it was developed by life. If these lifeforms had learned to travel faster than light it seems likely they would send their scientist's to other planets similar to their's to observe the creation of life and the advancement of intelligence, possibly explaining UFO sightings across the globe! Also they would likely be searching for resources and possibly even a relocation home. Of coarse "History 2" experts claim to have found planets made entirely of diamonds, water, and even marijuana! This too would make sense if this civilization had invented a "Universal Assembler", nanobot technology that takes any raw material and reconfigure it's atoms to create any product you desire. If you made it through this with your brain in one piece, bravo! You now understand the universe through God's eyes and see the possibility of other intelligent lifeforms! Even if we all agree we are the only life in this Galaxy, only a prideful man could claim we are the only life in the Universe! Assuming the Big Bang theory's single starting point, travelling closer to the center of the universe would almost certainly end with the discovery of other space-faring species, billions of years older than humanity. Thank You for reading, I hope all our ambitions of understanding this universe may be fulfilled! -James Weninger I feel as though I must add that Steven Hawking's teachings on time are throwing off science entrepreneurs with his theories. One must understand that he see's things the way he does because he has a SPECIFIC goal to his research, to discover time travel. If I wanted to become the size of an atom bad enough I could create a delusional world where this was possible too, but that doesn't mean that it will ever actually work. He is looking at the universe relatively while I am looking at it from "God View" and that is how I have come to these conclusions. Although I must refrain from defaming him too much as my "White Hole/Black Hole Cycle Theory" is based on his discovery of Hawking Radiation! I look forward to hearing your comments! -James Weninger Hawking Time.bmp Weninger Time.bmp

Your interpretation of Relativity needs to be simplified. Time travel is not LITERAL it is figurative. In Steven Hawking's "Briefer History Of Time" he uses the analogy of a man bouncing a ping pong ball on a train to describe relativity. The man on the train bounces the ball, and from his point of relativity it bounces in the same spot twice. A man standing along the rails though would see the ball bounce in two different spots from his point of relativity. The realization of relativity, found by Einstein, was that both men were right! The ball had bounced in the same spot on the train, but the train was in two different spots as the time between bounces transpired. To fully understand this one must use what I like to call the "God View" where one can pause/FF/rewind time while zooming in and out to fully understand what transpired(like the view one has while running a simulation). Relativity has confused many scientists who, encouraged by Steven Hawking, believe that time is curved and can be manipulated by speed. This is false. Relativity is the understanding that when you conduct an experiment your observations will be relative to the scale at which you observe! Zoom in and you may see a ball bouncing in the same spot, then zoom out and you realize that the trains speed changes the location of the spot as time moves forward, and the results of your experiment change. I predict that if one were to zoom in on the inner workings of a clock you would find that they are effected by gravity, so as you increase/decrease the gravitational pull on the clock the time between ticks will change effectively fooling humanity into believing they had just went forward/backward in time, like the guy on the train. Time is a measurable dimension that is constant and consistent. Time Travel is commonly thought of in it's literal form such as a time machine, or relativity's twist on this using a space ship traveling faster than light. These are both fictitious. Time travel is not LITERALLY possible, however it is RELATIVELY possible! Have I got you confused yet? LOL! Relatively speaking when we look at a star 4 light years away(Proxima Centauri) we are seeing 4 years into it's past because it's light takes 4 years to reach our eyes. If we were flying in a space ship at the speed of light twords the star we would have witnessed 8 years of the stars history in 4 years, and thus we would have relatively "fast forwarded" in time. The God View however would be able to see the lights long journey to earth, watched the space shuttle travel twords the star and all things would happen in sequence without any disruption or "singularities". Now we should have a common understanding of "Relativity's" meaning, so lets talk about realistic time travel. In order to bring this into the realm of universal understanding I am going to use our Galaxy as the point of the topic, however once grasped it makes one wonder about the implications once the whole body of the Universe is taken into account! A Solar System is the area in which planets orbit a star. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is filled with solar systems approximated by NASA to be some tens of billions. NASA places our solar system somewhere about halfway between our black hole and the outer rim of the galaxy. Taking into consideration the long term scale on which galactic events happen, one could imagine that just as our planet evolved so to must other, much older, planets have evolved. A solar system with conditions similar to ours, and nearer to the black hole, would have had the chance to produce life long before our planet was anything more than dust. Therefore, if the planet's lifeforms had discovered science, their lifeforms would most likely have escaped their planet before it's eventual doom and effectively became a space faring species! If we traveled twords this species space station and learned to communicate(given they are peaceful) we would have relatively traveled to the future, learning all kinds of technologies from these beings. Because our Galaxy is roughly 100,000 Light Years across(NASA) we can say that if we were observing this planet we would be seeing about 50,000 years into it's past, possibly before it was developed by life. If these lifeforms had learned to travel faster than light it seems likely they would send their scientist's to other planets similar to their's to observe the creation of life and the advancement of intelligence, possibly explaining UFO sightings across the globe! Also they would likely be searching for resources and possibly even a relocation home. Of coarse "History 2" experts claim to have found planets made entirely of diamonds, water, and even marijuana! This too would make sense if this civilization had invented a "Universal Assembler", nanobot technology that takes any raw material and reconfigure it's atoms to create any product you desire. If you made it through this with your brain in one piece, bravo! You now understand the universe through God's eyes and see the possibility of other intelligent lifeforms! Even if we all agree we are the only life in this Galaxy, only a prideful man could claim we are the only life in the Universe! Assuming the Big Bang theory's single starting point, travelling closer to the center of the universe would almost certainly end with the discovery of other space-faring species, billions of years older than humanity. Thank You for reading, I hope all our ambitions of understanding this universe may be fulfilled! -James Weninger I feel as though I must add that Steven Hawking's teachings on time are throwing off science entrepreneurs with his theories. One must understand that he see's things the way he does because he has a SPECIFIC goal to his research, to discover time travel. If I wanted to become the size of an atom bad enough I could create a delusional world where this was possible too, but that doesn't mean that it will ever actually work. He is looking at the universe relatively while I am looking at it from "God View" and that is how I have come to these conclusions. Although I must refrain from defaming him too much as my "White Hole/Black Hole Cycle Theory" is based on his discovery of Hawking Radiation! -James Weninger