puppypower

The fundamental principle of life and entropy is evident in the simple system of water and oil. If we start with water and oil, this will form two layers. If we add energy via agitation, we can increase the entropy of the system to form an emulsion. If we let the emulsion stand, without agitation, the entropy will spontaneously decrease back to two layers. This does not violate the second law of entropy because entropy is part of a larger equation connected to free energy G= H-TS, where H is enthalpy (internal energy), T is temperature K, and S is entropy. In this example, the emulsion lowers entropy because this is a way to lower the more dominate H connected to surface tension so G is minimized. There is a tendency, in discussions of entropy, to disconnect entropy from free energy and internal energy, which leads to misunderstanding. Under the special case where H=0, than G= -TS. This would make entropy free standing but this is only a special case. Closed systems do not have any change in internal energy H so this can create the more simplified special case. The interaction of water and organics, due to not always mixing, can amply the H or internal energy of living systems; membrane and water.This is maximized between water and organics and is one reason why water is so important to life. Using that source of H, entropy can be lowered into self ordering systems. For example, when protein fold, this is due to hydrophobic interactions on the protein. The protein folding is less to due to the protein wanting to bind to itself, as it is due to the need to bind to itself, because of the internal energy created by the presence of water; hydrophobic. This H is strong enough to lower the protein S into unique folds with probability equal to 1.0. Protein folding is not even subject to chance, but are extremely reliable due to H (water-organic) dominating S. When we make a cup in the factory will add H to mold it into a low S.

Dark energy and dark matter have never been proven, in the lab, to be real. These two things are inferred from large scale affects in the universe, which can't be explained using only the current assumptions of how the universe works. How does this differ from someone saying the finger of God does this? This finger of God can't be proven in the lab,either. They both have that in common. But both can be inferred by an affect,that the current theory can not explain. If this inference approach is considered a valid science, than base on the trends in science of not seeing God in the lab, maybe God can not seen directly in the lab, but can only be inferred by affect. This approach is not new to religion but is applied with miracles, which go beyond what science theory can explain; inferred from unexplained affect.

Here is an interesting study out of Germany that measured the impact of aerosols on the atmsophere.

In chemistry, Entropy S is connected to Free Energy G and Enthalpy H (internal energy) by the equation. G=H-TS, where T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin. The cup is a chemical state that we call ceramic. When we give it a push off the table, we add activation energy to push it over an energy hill to take advantage of gravity; table to floor. For entropy to increase, energy needs to be made available, which is done via velocity and collision. The entropy increase will absorb energy. The TS has the units of energy/mole/K. The second law or entropy will increase in the universe, is connected to the constant availability of free energy,y as the forces of nature lower potential. The sun releases heat from fusion. This heat is available to increase entropy and enthalpy. The plant will absorb energy and turn this into reduced carbon. This is connected to H or enthalpy. The cells burn this chemical energy and cause entropy to increase via the availability of energy/heat. The arrow of time, connected to entropy, is due to the availability of energy as universal potentials lower. Entropy is a state variable. This means the value of entropy is fixed for a given state of matter. For example the entropy of water at 25C is 6.6177 J mol-1 K-1 (25 °C). This is true no matter who measures it. The water may be composed of random collisions of H2O, but these always average the same for that state to give a fixed entropy value. This is an example of random leading to order; state. If we add energy to this state, some will go into H and some into S. The entropy increase will distribute to form a new state, which will always be measured the same for all. The living state is interesting in that life can induce state changes allowing a local decrease in entropy. This is sort of where the broken cup, reassembles. The most obvious example is connected to reverse osmosis, where water and ions becomes pure water by applying pressure. The new state has less entropy, while giving off the energy it once absorbed. The new state of water, with a lower entropy, can be used to assist things that need a lower entropy solvent state, to happen. This may be off the basic topic, but water is unique when it comes to entropy. This uniqueness comes from the fact that the hydrogen bonds of water can be ionic or covalent. The ionic state defines higher entropy, while the covalent state defines a state of lower entropy. One hydrogen bond without ever breaking, can switch between higher and lower entropy. This is useful for life in that the hydrogen bonds of water define binary switches; memory. The cell can shift to the lower entropy state of the hydrogen bonding to get a energy releases, while not breaking any hydrogen bonds. Or it can switch back to the high entropy state. Since this needs to absorb energy, it can act like an energy siphon which can help induce chemical reactions near enzymes.

An interesting observation about time is connected to an affect in photography called motion blur, as shown below. Motion blur occurs when the shutter speed is slower than the action speed. Since the photo stops time but conserves distance, the speed difference (d/t) shows up as uncertainty in distance; motion blur. Motion blur gives the mental impression of motion even though time is stopped in the photo. This suggests time is a potential that can convert to a potential in distance. This also suggests a time to distance potential conversion may well be the basis for Heisenberg Uncertainty. We can infer the momentum of the mouse but we can't fully determine its position; both due to motion blur. While we can measure the position of the cat, but we can't tell his momentum. The explanation is space-time is not set but rather time to distance potential conversions can distort space-time by making it distance heavy.

Randomness can lead to predetermination. This is possible in liquid state physics. One example of this is osmosis. In an osmosis, two chambers are separated by a semi-permeable membrane. One side is a pure liquid, like water and on the other side is water plus salt. The pure water will diffuse though the membrane in the direction of the ionic side, driven by an entropy increase, as the pure water randomizes on the ionic side. The water is randomizing and increasing entropy, yet this randomization generates a consistent predetermined pressure called the osmotic pressure. The movement of the water, at the micro-level is random yet the pressure at the macro-level is consistent and predetermined. All we need to know is the concentration of water doing the randomizing. Osmosis is a colligative property meaning it only depends on concentration and not which ions or diluents are present. It is connected to only entropy. Most of physics uses gas and solid state analogies. This example is more obvious in chemistry which deals in liquids . If the universe was modeled as a liquid, than a random micro can lead to macro order. One possible example of this is the quantum universe. We live in a quantum universe. In a quantum universe, only certain predetermined states are possible. The electron spectra of hydrogen has only distinct predetermined lines. This is not random. This is different from a continuous universe, where all states are possible. A quantum universe is less random than a continuous universe, In a quantum universe, all the dice are loaded compared to a continuous universe; six sided dice become two sided. Based on liquid state physics and a random micro leading to a order and predetermined macro, quantum may be the macro result.

We can also fly to the moon. This first journey will settle all doubt that this was even possible. It will also allow us to know things, which were only speculation, until the deal was closed. Going to the moon is more in proportion to predicting climate change, than falling off a cliff. The doom and gloom angle sells, whether it is right or wrong. If we used a more of the same angle, this would not create the same incentive for funding. But had Gore used the more of the same angle, he would have been right, today. Did you take the Gore hook? And did you believe what he said of the future, which would be shown to be a fantasy? I was not fooled. Many who fell for this feel a need to double down.

This is a delicate subject for rational science discussion, since it has become so political and conditioned by irrational emotions. Just not going along, will make you a target, since there so much unconscious over compensation due to emotions exceeding reason. If you ever watched dogs, it is true that some dogs will show what appears to be homosexual behavior toward other dogs. However, the bottom dog will more often than not, fight back against this. Fighting against homosexuality is natural in dogs as exhibiting homosexual behavior. What I found is dogs use homosexual behavior as a form of aggression to help define pack order. Instead of fighting and biting, the homosexuality is used as a weaker form of aggression for dominance among pack mates. The aggression angle explains the need for defensiveness. If you look art modern politics, homosexuals tend to be far more militant as a group and will gang attack anyone who does not go along. I am doing an experiment here to show you this aggression side. If you don't sell a wedding cake, they will attack you with legal and political aggression until you are "f---ked". This also may be why leather, whips and chains, although a stereo-type, is part of the dress code. Although some dogs go through the motions of homosexuality, it is more like dry humping. The dynamics is not about procreation, but a gesture of dominance. The bottom dog will very rarely will allow this to go until the deal to close. This limit is natural. After that, this data does not apply to human homosexuality. I can see the aggression angle playing a role in pack order, but self defense is also part of the dynamics of pack order. But closing the deal is not part of the dynamics that are found in nature. Humans have unlimited will and choice but natural has limits.

The one data I was talking about is manmade global warming. If man made global warming is true, for the sake of argument, this would be the first time in the history of the earth that man/humans have caused the global temperature to rise. This is a unique event. This is not like natural warming and cooling, which has occurred many times in the earth's history. Can you show me another time in the earth's history that man caused global warming? If not, this is a unique data point in terms of a cause and effect for global warming. Being unique means we do not know the future for sure. Say man made global warming had happened a thousands years ago, for the sake of argument, we could compare the two different occurrences and use a straight line between the points, to get the proper angle in terms of anticipated cause and effect. We would have a history to compare. But since this is a unique cause and effect event/data point, which has only manifested itself over the past 100 years, any angle can be drawn and still touch that one point. The angle chosen is doom and gloom, since fear sells. The media uses this angle since people stay tuned fear longer with, than with hope, thereby selling more soap. Gore is not a scientist, yet few scientist in the consensus refuted him. Why is that? He was selling doom and gloom and even if he was wrong science would benefit by the fear=more resources needed to appease fear. You never read Gore's take on man global warming to see how much came true? Here is a link to the original 2006 speech that fueled your movement. Did you accept this original as true and go though the next decade in a fantasy? /truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/65599:al-gore--global-warming-is-the-immediate-crisis The main doom and gloom prediction of manmade global was the poles caps melting. Do you remember the conference that went to the Antarctica to look at the melted ice, who got trapped in the ice? http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2014/01/02/global-warming-researchers-rescued-from-arctic-ice/ About a decade ago we had some major hurricanes that were conveniently blamed on manmade global warming. The doom and gloom predictions saw this a future trend. The very next year, to the present, hurricanes occurrences decreased. Now they split the difference to cove all angle and say there will be fewer but stronger. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/global-warming-to-bring-s_n_471227.html If seems disingenuous for you and others to act like you never heard any of this and then claim I am making this up using a threat of science based censor to scam the minions. These conclusions, which never panned out, are based on science, but science conclusions are only as good as their underlying assumptions. Something is wrong. Climate change is more nebulous than global warming, since anything that the models don't predict properly, like hurricanes, gets to be lumped into climate change, as though saying, we did our best, but climate change is fickle. So we need more money to appease the fear of the added element of the fickle climate. Climate change can be correlated to natural events, since the earth has done this before without man. The link between man and climate change is not as easy as a possible link between global warming and man, due to the contradictory complexity that is used to justify many things. This is not yet a full data point; cause and effect correlation. That is unscientific, since it uses a weak foundation without precedent on which science is to built so it can justify more doom and gloom. If you look at Gore's predictions, which were not refuted, point by point, by the consensus of science, what has happened in reality is the bulk earth appears to be absorbing the change into less dramatic global adjustments. This is hard data based on observation that compare prediction to the reality of the the 20 years. Doom and gloom is not scientifically based, compared to what we see happening on the global scale. Smaller pockets have had drastic events, but the bulk earth is maintaining continuity.

Galileo had to fight against a consensus of man; politics, and did so because he believed in the truth. Politics can also be part of churches and is where man replaces truth with power and prestige. Consensus is about stacking the deck to maintain the status quo. This is not how science is supposed to work. Galileo saw no moral conflict, seeking the truth of nature; science. If Galileo had wanted to move up the company ladder, it would have been easier to just go along and not make waves. But that would have conflicted with the assumption of something higher than the politics of man. If you believe man is as high as it goes; no higher power; God, politics can mean more than truth, since truth will be called relative and politics allows you to rise among men. For the religious, since God is separate and higher, one may have to become separate from man, when seeking truth. If you look at manmade global warming, how many of the doom and gloom predictions over the past 20-30 years have materialized? The poles did not melt and the globe is not flooded, which were among the main doom and gloom predictions that got the movement in motion. Truth is not important, since the consensus still uses the same doom and gloom approach, even though 30 years of data says marginal change has resulted. This data driven truth is not considered higher than a rehash by the consensus. This is due to atheist science being more about the needs of man; maintaining and expanding funding. I prefer we know the truth, even if this is not good for jobs and careers. You as an atheist, do not appear to be looking at the prediction results over the past 20 years ago; the proof of concept. You act like this data never happened. This is expected from atheism. Atheism is closed minded in the sense it tends to submit easier to peer pressure since truth is relative, while consensus can be used to make life harder or easier, so people stay with the consensus.

If you ever heard the saying, birds of a feather will stick together, this is about how groups select themselves. The ugly duckling is different from the group and will be driven out of the flock, so the group can maintain certain traits. Some of the selective pressure comes from consciousness and not just the environment. In discussion forums, if the group says one thing and someone plays the role of the ugly duckling, who goes in another direction, a pressure will appear to maintain pure group blood; of the mind. Migration is often about the ugly duckling being pressured to leave, and therefore needing to find place where the pressure is less so it can start again and possibly form its own group, which will also seek pure blood. The story of the ugly duckling show he is actually a beautiful swan; of value. Dogs are interesting in that the breeders will weed out the ugly ducklings, with some of the ugly duckling migrating (sold) and then becoming the foundation for other breeds, whose breeders then weed out the new ugly ducklings.

Even since manmade global warming has been in vogue, most of the predictions have been based on the doom and gloom angle of a curve balancing on one data point. However, few of these predictions have come true, over the past 20-30 years, at the level of the angle of the sale pitch. Al Gore had the polar bears going extinct by now and the ice caps all melted. This sold well to the minions. But what has happened, in hard reality, is more of the same, instead of what was predicted by the doom and gloom angle. Consensus science is using the wrong angle when drawing a curve through its one unique data point. This angle has been chosen because fear sells. If you scare people they will become irrational, which is what you need. If you notice although polar bears did not go extinct, there is no apology for being wrong or any push to change the angle and try a new approach. The doom and gloom angle continues. I am pointing this out because the consensus of pseudo-scientists who are continuing to manipulate using an angle that is not working out in nature, but is designed more for the needs of money and power. Manmade global warming was recently rebranded, like the "new Coke", into climate change. This new pitch allows any angle, including doom and gloom, to be justified. If the polar bears go extinct this is due to climate change, but if they don't this is due to climate change. If the polar caps melt this is due to climate change, but if their don't this is due to climate change. Go back and look at all the doom and gloom predictions made since the doom and gloom angle was chosen of this unique event. Any real science would have tried a new angle, as the data collects and does not pan out, and not just double down with the same old scare ingle. This is all about sales pitch to the ignorant. If I had predicted, 20 years ago, that the earth has warmed slightly, but little major change will occur, this angle would have been much closer to the hard data. This is a better angle, but it does not sell as well in terms of expanding the global warming industry.

If you compare a continuous universe to a quantum universe, a continuous universe has unlimited states even between two quantum states. A quantum universe actually loads the dice, compared to a continuous universe, making the universe far more deterministic. A random model is not rational but is a regression to before the age of reason, when the universe was assumed random. The alchemist assumed lead could turn into gold as one of many random states. Later it was learned atomic dice are loaded; deterministic, and this can't happen with a simple roll of the dice.

One area of pressure related change is domestic dogs. The Australian Cattle dog, the Belgian Malinois, and the American Pitbull have all appeared in separate places on the earth, over the past about 100 years, due to each having a low pressure; cuddled, environment that allowed each to differentiate. If these three dogs had appeared naturally, we would have attributed this to evolution. It shows what can happen if we selectively reduce the pressure. Humans merely speeded up the process with an exaggerated cuddle. This is loosely analogous to time/temperature testing of plastics, where exaggerated parameters of temperature, allows us to predict, longer term properties, like 25 year plastics, in a few hours. Domestication did in 100 years what nature may take thousands, via concentrated cuddle time testing.

The problem manmade global warming faces, based on the philosophy of science, is manmade global warming even if true, is a unique event that has no precedent in science or history. There is no second data point, to draw a straight line, to eliminate nonscientific conclusions. With one point, you can draw any curve you like and it will go through that one point. Without a second point you don't really know if you have the right angle.This is why few predictions have panned out and why global warming had to be rebranded as climate change. Doom and gloom sells but is this the proper curve angle? Climate change is a way to blame anything and everything on climate change, while not having to explain anything. If it rains, this is due to climate change and if it does not rain this is due to climate change. This covers all angles with one point, but in a sneaky way. There was a character, by a comedian call Flip Wilson, whose line was, "the devil made me do it". No matter what happened to get a laugh, in every skit the character would say, "the devil made me do it". The character did not have to explain anything and was able to get away with everything for a laugh. Climate change cart blanche approach appears to be based on that Flip Wilson character. In every skit on the news, no matter what happens, climate change made me do it, without ever having to explain or reason why. To me at least natural history data has more than one point for most things and does not use to rely on the "devil made me do it" approach to address things, because two or more data points will also gives a better curve.

Say you have a rich modernized country and a poor backwards country. What we will do is could swap the two populations. This will cause new pressures to appear on the formerly rich because of the extra stresses they will face within the poor country. It will also take away many of the former stresses from the formerly poor, due to the abundance, social security and opportunity in the rich countries. Then we sit back and watch what happens. It is easy to predict. I used medicine, initially, as a way to show a way humans reduce natural environmental stresses, that would cause higher attrition, because many genetic mutations will not survive without medicine. Relatives to the above example, the rich who have previous medical conditions that require modern medicine, will find new stresses, since such services are not common. While those from the poor, will find an extra level of ease, since even hangnails are covered by insurance. This can protect one from themselves. One way, that is not being discussed, that can create lower stress is migration. If one is living in an area where there is a lot of competition and environmental stress one may not have any advantage. However, if you migrate one increases the odds they will find a place with less stress and more advantage. This sudden appearance and selective advantage in the new place, may wrongly be associated with a genetic change or mutation. But it is really due to consciousness reversing engineering an easier environment; migration optimization. This is like the old song says, "I am going to where the weather suits my clothes".

By believing in God, which is a concept that is defined as be higher than man, one becomes more concerned with natural or higher truth instead of artificial or relative truth. Natural is created by God and artificial is created by man. This is not much different from working in a large company. The guy at the top has more say than the middle manager. On the other hand, if there is no guy at the top, the word the middle manager becomes the new standard. If look at Manmade Global warming, one argument being used is this is based on scientific consensus. The problem is that science is not based on consensus, since one good data set, by one person, can supersede even a 99.99% consensus. Consensus is much more important in politics; artificial. This appeals much more to atheists and middlemen. The religious tend to hold out, looking for hard irrefutable evidence, and not a political consensus in science clothing.

The theory makes sense and is put into practice by humans. For example, medicine deals with threats and stresses caused by disease. If we let these diseases run their course, fewer people would survive such that diversity of the genes would decrease. But with medicine, we make living easier allowing otherwise high risk people, due to disease stress, to reproduce. This can result in the same problems perpetuating, which is not a problem as long as the stress stays low. Say there was a disruption of culture and medical care is disrupted so all the disease stresses return. Those who are here, due to medicine lowering the stress, will see the stress return, and will concentrate down until the genetic pool gets narrower. If you look at sexually transmitted disease, medicine allows promiscuous behavior to flourish, by removing a natural stress. If medicine was disrupted, sexual transmitted disease would spread environmental stress, and many would go extinct.

General relativity does not explain how matter changes phases within a gravitational field. This is explained with pressure. This is not speculation, but is connected to basic principles of physical chemistry. GR is a separate layer of the total gravity affect. For example, we can generate high pressure phases, such the earth's mantle phase; molten flux, on the earth's surface; surface space-time due to GR, using mechanical means like an anvil press. This phase is not dependent on GR. The laws of physics are the same in all references, with the same pressure able to generate the same phase. Black hole analysis without pressure considerations are half baked and misleading. Maybe this discussion is only about the GR layer. I that case any discussion of pressure may be out of line. My concern is only talking about the GR layer makes one think they can enter a black hole, remain conscious, and come out the other side; worm hole, without being squished. This is not possible. If you entered a blackhole your matter would be pressurized such that no trace of any original proton, electron or neutron would remain. There is a bridge concept between GR and pressure; entropy, which can explain why a good fraction of the energy generated by a blackhole does not exit a black hole. It may not explain 100%. Consider two space-time references. One reference is more expanded and faster; surface of the sun, and the other is slower and more contracted; core of the sun. To make this analysis easier we will get rid of pressure and matter phases and only look at space-time like we do with GR. What I will now do is build two identical factories which both make identical cogs. Each factory makes one defect per hour. This defect will be a measure of factory entropy. I will now place one factory in each of the two references. Since time is running faster on the surface reference compared to the core reference, side-by-side, the rate of entropy increase is faster on the surface, since the number of defective cogs will accumulate faster, simply due to time moving faster. The second law indirectly implies an expanding universe, since an expansion of space-time makes the rate of entropy increase. Based on the entropy rate increasing as space-time expands, energy from the core of the blackhole is absorbed, at least in part, into the entropy rate increase.

Gravity exerts pressure as well as GR. Pressure can have its own impact in terms of not seeing energy leave a black hole. For example, the energy from the fusion in our sun's core, does not escape to the surface, not because of the curvature of space-time and GR, but because the matter above is opaque to this energy. It can only move up through convection and conduction. If we took a hydrogen atom and added energy we can ionize the electron. The energized electron will drop down energy levels and give off the hydrogen energy spectra. But if we increase the pressure of the hydrogen, until we have solid metallic hydrogen, energy becomes part of the metal state; distributed. With black holes one will expect pressure to push matter to beyond neutron density, into exotic states of matter where the substructure of matter comes out to assume phases where the boundaries of atomic matter are blurred. Any exothermic output from this, that touches higher layers of on deck neutron density, will causes this to sub-particle ionize, into the core phase.

Water is interesting among nearly all liquids in that liquid water expands when it freezes. Even though water/ice expands at 0 C, it reaches a maximum density at about 4 degree C. What that means is, as the lake water gets colder at the surface, the surface water becomes denser and begins to sink, causing the warmer less dense water, below, to float upward. This create a convection requires that the bulk water of the lake has to reach about 4 C, before it can cool beyond that; cold water sinking. At 3 C water now begins to get less dense, therefore this water can stay on top of the 4 C water, with convention stopping at the top. When it reaches 0 C it freezes and expands about 10%. As the ice gets colder and colder the ice continues to float; still no convection. This is useful for life that lives in the bottom during winter. As the Lakes get warmer, it takes longer to reach the 3 C point where the surface convection stops and ice can form.

The way you infer that law is stored in two places is based on how memory (long term) is written to the cerebral matter. This requires aspects of the limbic systems, which also assign emotional valance. Law is effective because of the fear of punishment for violation of the law. I don;t drive 100 mph all the time on the highway, because of fear of the law. It is not because my car can't drive that fast or I am afraid to drive that fast. The good side of the law stores a different feeling. If you do good and drive 65 mph, there is no fear, because the other fear side of the law is not conscious, even if implied. This is different from someone, for example, either being afraid of a new idea, or able to embrace it with both hands. Both emotional reactions are possible, but only one or the other emotion will be assigned. If this happens in a group, this may result in two sides forming around the issue; those with the negative association and those with the position association. With law, both feelings are implied inside the person, but only one may be conscious at a time. Either I feel safe, or concerned due to fear of violation. Mixed emotions are similar. I can love and hate by girlfriend. I can think of the things I like about her; good times. I can then switch my mind to things I don't like; bad times. This inner conflict of switching back and forth quickly to merge the feeling takes a lot of energy. So I might settle on one side, and think of the good times and forget about the bad. Unlike time healing all wounds, and the bad time memories with the girlfriend will lessen with time, the law binary is refreshed and not allowed to change. Law is often mistaken for moral law, but actually laws means all law, since all law uses the same binary memory schema of fear and social reward. Law was not written for the honest person, but for the lawless and the sinner. I did not need a law about strip mining because I don't even think of doing that. If there was no law I would act the same. The problem is, since the honest man has to remember all the negative sides of law, to know th law, culture has written evil into the mind of the honest man. Violation will increase. The example of the EPA shows although there are now 70,000 pages of laws to protect the environment and therefore one should logically feel cleaner and safer, many people are convinced things are worse. This is not even logical based on all the extra being done. There was less fear before the EPA was formed as an agency, even though there were hundreds of problems that were not yet addressed. The law is compounding fear in the name of doing good, even in the minds of good people. This is interesting because the fear side of law creates stress and therefore prevents the hippocampus from forming new neurons, which could potentially alter the valence association of the law memory. Law makes you linear and partially brain dead to where you can;t think but can only react; children of the bondwoman; slaves to law.

A snow cover will insulate the ground and can protect some plants from deep freezing. However, as the air warms in the spring, the same snow becomes like the ice in a cooler. On warm springs days this can lead to fog and filtering of the sun for a double cooling effect.

We model acceleration with GR, but this approach creates a middleman approach that has limits. Space-time is a dependent variable, since space-time does not just form wells all by itself in empty space void of matter and energy. The curving of space-time around the earth depends on earth's matter to curve it. The middleman approach of GR has a limitation, since middlemen, like space-time, don't have the final say. If we look at the gravitational force, this is GR plus pressure. GR deals with space-time, while pressure deals with the interaction of matter to form various phases of matter and accompanied energy. Pressure and the phases of matter determine the final size and density distribution of matter, which then defines the shape and curvature of the space-time well. Different materials can alter †he space-time well, due to different possible phases. It would not be easy to find gas planets with the same space-time well as our rocky earth planet. This has to do with matter phase differences and difference in mass density defining the parameters of space-time. Gravity can act on any form of matter. That being said, acceleration is d/t/t or acceleration is one part distance and two parts time; It is space-time plus time. The extra time unit, beyond space-time reflects the impact of matter in shaping the space-time well defined for GR. One way to explain this extra time unit is to consider the hypothetical situation of two space-time references, side by side. One reference is the standard and the other reference has time running slower. Say hypothetically, I could stand in the standard reference and then stick my arm into the slow reference. What I will do is dribble a basketball in the slow reference, while retaining my connection to the standard reference. When I push the ball down to dribble it, because time is running slower, the ball does not respond properly relative to my reference The ball appears to lag. What I will need to do is push harder to compensation for the slowed time, so the ball appears to move the same as it should in the standard reference. When the ball rebounds the floor and hits my hand, it is moving properly, but it now has this extra inertia as though its mass has increased in my reference. It will require more force than normal to counteract the inertia of the mass, to get the expected ball reaction. If you notice a simple time reference difference has created what appears to be changes in force, mass, acceleration and inertia relative to the standard. Mass is form of time potential.

Law is a unique form of memory in terms of memory storage in the brain. When the brain creates memory, aspects of the limbic system in the core region of brain will attach an emotional tag, while writing the memory to the cerebral matter. This is useful to animals and natural instinct since looking at something; bone, that is also previously written in memory, will trigger the attached feeling that was written to memory; this feels good, allowing the animal to make a quick gut decision. Law is unique because law is a binary form of memory; Satan is traditionally the binarius. To know a law you need to know what not to do; the evil, as well as the correct and accepted path of action; the good. This allows one to extrapolate new situations. Because these are opposite and mutually exclusive feelings, the result is the brain stores each law in two places; good feeling place and bad feeling place. This is not natural but is manmade. Symbolic places like heaven and hell are a projection of this; all the good feelings are in one place and all the bad feelings are in a different place. If you think of heaven all is nice while hell is a place of fear and pain. The problem with binary memory via law is connected to the way consciousness works. We tend focus on one thing at a time and therefore if we fixate on being good by the law, the dark side of the law remains in memory, but becomes repressed. This is why a person who works hard to be perfect by the law, can becomes unconsciously compelled to sin; fight this each day. Sin taking opportunity through the command produces sin of all kinds. This quote is based on repression of the evil side, written into the brain, due to law; by trying to do only what is considered good by the law. During the Salem witch trials, people felt they were doing good by their law; protecting others. The repression of evil, caused compulsions all the way to murder; sin taking opportunity through the command produced sin of all kinds. The self righteous often get mean due to the repressed dark side of law, allowing the ends to justify the means; sin taking opportunity through the commandments. When Paul talks about doing away with law, this is about getting rid of the binary writing process; one law with both love and fear. One is not getting rid of good and evil, but rather one become more like a natural animal who can react to both love and fear, but in a unified memory way, that does not cause binary memory unconsciousness. An interesting application of this is of the two political parties, the Democrat party creates the most laws and regulations by far. They induce the most writing to binary memory. The liberal brain, in turn, who accepts this easiest, become polarizes so they see the world as polarized into black and white, male and female rich and poor, police and civilians, etc. Since they are good and right, their unconscious projects all the evil on the other sides. They teach tolerance but are intolerant of all the polarized others.The need for relative morality is in response to the constant repression of half the huge binary memory law, and therefore a need to justify constant unconscious compulsion no matter how bizarre. The EPA has 70,000 pages of laws of good and evil. Even with that much "evil" regulated, people project this as the worse of times in terms of pollution. This irrationality is driven by binary unconsciousness. The way this is reversed is by decreasing the polarization of the mind with less and less binary law. One can still achieve the goal of law, but without binary law; through faith.