Maximillian

This energy can come from solar panels, that will be used in the charging process, if not charging can be done from Earth before launch. Photons are massless and can't produce friction to discharge the orbiter.

Taking a spacecraft of 10-4Farads and a pd of 100,000 volts we can generate a force of 10Newtons on the spacecraft. This force is clearly more than ion thruster engines. The fact that we won't need any reaction mass makes it more cheaper and also stay in orbit indefinitely. Once we have the spacecraft charged by applying a pd across it, no more energy is needed to move it and so it will move on it's own.

Just like how a jet engine uses the air it moves through to propel it self forward. In this case energy for ionizing the propellant won't be needed because we already have ions. How viable is my proposal?

No need of long electrodynamic tethers and so will enable a small foot print and low maintenance costs. No need of power to run current through the tethers at all times to boost orbital velocity since we are already charged. How viable is my proposal?

Two conical opposite sign charged bodies are placed in a hollow circular cylindrical charged body where they experience a one directional force at all points. What physics law will it be violating? Please you can follow this link containing the excerpt from the patent https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298017787_ENERGY_PRODUCTION_FROM_ROTARY_MOTION_OF_CHARGED_BODY_INTERACTIONS

I didn't rule out the backward push on the spacecraft, a solar sail can simply be used to slow down the orbit to return the system closer to the Sun.

Let me try to give more detail as much as I can. The gyroscope will consist of a fly wheel rotating about a shaft placed perpendicularly to the the spin center attached to the payload. The payload is placed stationary at the center to prevent its avionics from getting damaged due to high accelerations. The main reason am proposing this is we want to store enough angular momentum in the system so that we can transform it to linear momentum by ejecting the reaction mass to move the payload faster than currently possible. This is not possible with current solar sail designs because you always get pushed away before you get enough momentum.

There is a patent I filed last year, It implements solar sails. To ensure that we keep close to the sun and get most of its radiation pressure, we will use what I call a solar propeller but the name solar mill makes more sense.So lets call it a solar mill. This is a solar sail that instead of being pushed away by the sun's radiation pressure it actually keeps spinning about its axis. We all agree that we cannot keep on increasing the spin indefinitely because the solar sails will break apart at a certain centrifugal force. To prevent damage to our payload we shall keep it stationary using a gyroscope at the center of the system. A magnetic bearing can be used to reduce friction between the spinning ends and non spinning center. After reaching the desired linear velocity, the mass attachments at the arms will then be ejected periodically in a specified direction to slowly build velocity of the payload. To slow down at the destination the remaining attachments are ejected in the opposite direction. Suppose you have a solar sail of a circumference of 10km and a mass of one tonne. Lets assume its material can hold centripetal force at 100rev per second. We shall be having a linear velocity of 1000kms-1. This velocity by such a mass can never be attained using conventional rocket propulsion but thanks to the Sun its no problem. It will take about 3 months to attain this linear velocity if placed at the orbit of mercury. Is my patent valuable?

Please read this https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283225706_HOW_TO_GIVE_A_SPACECRAFT_A_TRANSLATION_MOTION_AT_CONSTANT_MASS Abstract When you fire a bullet the gun experiences a backward displacement that can be stopped when the fired bullet hits an attachment to the gun beyond the muzzle. At the end you have the entire gun system being displaced through space at a constant mass. This is best done using an electric gun that does not consume gun powder. I have written this basing on experiments I have personally carried out. Your ideas are welcome.

Please read this https://www.researchgate.net/pub... Abstract Multiplying radius r of a particle on both sides of the de Broglie relation equation produces angular momentum at the bottom of the equation. This relationship can enable us determine atoms and Subatomic particle sizes as I have clearly explained in this paper. We can use this do determine the relationship between particle size, charge, half life etc. especially when we now know how fast these Subatomic particles spin. This would help us better understand charge. A particle with a bigger size will often have a smaller range in air than a smaller particle of the same mass. It could also explain baryon asymmetry as I have clearly explained in this paper. Your ideas are welcome.