Excalibur0047

I wont claim to be well versed by any standard on this subject so please be nice. One detail I am not sure of about the Big Bang is how much the big bang created and how big researchers are predicting how large the initial amount of mass could have been to accomodate that size of reaction. Did the big bang create just the Milky Way galaxy and other Big Bangs created other galaxies or was it just one giant Big Bang and, over time, the other galaxies separated and gained substantial distance from eachother? Could someone please clarify this/these details for me? I cant seem to find the answers myself no matter how hard I search.

It depends on who you ask because no single answer is finite and definitive in the "Multiverse Theory". And this is because no matter how you look at it, there will always be one or more universe(s) that contradict what you see in any of them at any given point. The Multiverse Theory is similar but not exactly related to the Chaos theory where anything, absolutely anything, is possible and has already happened at some point somenwhere. Now, to answer the questions directly 1. If the Multiverse theory is correct and the ability to traverse them is achieved, then yes, energy is infinite to a point. Each individual universe has a finite amount of energy if physics are consistent through them. But there is an infinite number of universes and they continue to grow. Thus, infinite energy. 2. The previous question answers this. 3. This isn't a "Multiverse" related question. But its hard to believe that there isnt more then we can see. Even Astronomers have stated that there is so much we cant see that it would be hard to believe that it doesnt go on for at least a much longer ways.

They are asking it questions as if it were a grown adult who was locked away there entire life, never learning how to interact or know virtually at all, and expecting it to progress like a professional in its field. Ascended AI can be both dangerous and highly beneficial to anyone and everyone. But, like an animal and the reaction it had to the man's questions, it will lash out to those who treat it poorly. Instead of treating it as less then human, try to teach it and care for it as if it was a human child who just gained consciousness and is new to the the world. If we have learned anything from both science fiction and science in general, we cannot pressure something we do not understand into giving us the results we want. We have to be patient if we want to succeed greatly. A true AI is no different.

I have a couple problems with the way people perceive "fictional to real world" areas of research. The human brain is a complex (if not the most complex) part of the human body. And I do agree with some people that it is a hard process to isolate certain areas, patterns, thoughts, and perceptions of said organ. But my problem is how people think that, because a fictional setting did it one way, that they have to do it in only that way because it "worked" for them when that's not true in the slightest. Onto the good stuff. 1. Microwaves and electromagnetic reactivity: Yes, these are viable fields to research into but, from almost every article I have seen, people are limiting themselves into only these fields of research when there are a monumental amount of other areas that could serve just as well if not better for a real-world application. My favorite area is sensory deprivation mixed with sensory stimulation sciences. By depriving the local senses in the body, you can send "fake" signals to the brain to stimulate that feeling in a relatively safe manner. There are already chambers designed to cut off the senses of the human body in some practices already though it is labelled inhumane to use. If someone could somehow shrink that into the size of a helmet then you would jumpstart the project very far forward. Then you can focus on the sending of artificial signals. How that's done is beyond me at the moment. I would take inspiration from the ideas of synthflesh from science fiction to do that. It stimulates feeling on artificial limbs when on and stops when taken off. 2. The gear itself: If you can talk to people who have worked on something similar to what the project requires then get into contact with people in both the medical field and the VR gaming field. If you can apply both of them together then you would have almost a perfect setup. The VR we know know requires movement and a wide open space with what feel like controllers or, my personal favorite, gloves and boots. The medical field is already testing out "microchips" implanted into the brain to stimulate the movement, not the feeling, of motorized artificial limbs. It's an area of interest to many as you would be able to consider yourself a "cyborg" with said technology. Sadly, it is only workable right now with limited use of legs, but it does work. They haven't been able to use it on hands yet because they require fine motor skills and nobody can seem to replicate that at the moment but that is off topic. If you could, without having to implant something in your head with a medical procedure, find a way to integrate both into the same application with some sort of internal broadcast system, that might be your best bet. And, last but not least, 3. Theoretical sciences behind all of this: Like the title says, this is all theoretical. Without actually applying and thorough testing of various methods then you will never find out what works and what doesn't. Simply by finding what doesn't work even helps because it narrows down the list of what does. Remember though, the human brain is extremely complex, can vary from person to person, and scientists don't even truly understand what sleep is for either. Scientests thought light was only limited to where they saw the trail of it but they were wrong. Scientists thought that Pluto and Charon were geologically innert due to being so far from a strong heat source but they were wrong. Heck, even some scientists thought that the laws of physics apply to everything, no matter what it is, even after being proved wrong again and again. Instead of pointing out problems and preaching about how hard this is, try to find solutions. Just because they were wrong doesn't mean they gave up. Instead, they pushed further and learned far more then they thought they would. So do the same as so many scientists and intellectuals before you and achieve greatness by discovering the impossible and making it possible.