Itoero

What causes cosmological redshift? Can it be due to gravitation? (gravitational redshift)

Thanks for that explanation. According to what I read hydrogen bonds in water (which cause the cohesion) are about 0,197 nm to 0,3 nm. And a watermolecule's diameter is about 0,275 nm. Isn't this a small 'intermoleular' distance compared to the size of the molecule? IIs the size of the nuclei related to the diameter? The reason light can't reach the ocean bottom is often said to be due the interaction of photons with opaque particles. But since intermolecular distance (hydrogen bonds)keeps growing smaller, shouldn't light in theory reach the oceaan bottom yet there is not enough to observe/measure it? Since the distance between watermolecules grows smaller you need more and more power to shine light through water. This causes a 'limit' related to the depth of the oceans where Bioluminescence is still possible/doable/lucrative.

General relativity and quantum mechanics. When I was neophyte, I was a wannabe know all.

So you refuse to spend 10 minutes on a video that might debunk your belief system? You do know that the holographic principle combines the two?

Maybe it's related to the foodsource. Something else from the wikipedia: The smallest cheetahs have been reported from the Sahara, northeastern Africa and Iran.

Humans are just one of the countless lifeforms on earth. If we have afterlife then an oak tree and a mosquito also have afterlife?

I rather mean if you think you have a form of interaction with God then you will ascribe human properties to God because you interact with 'him'. I don't really know how to explain this. When you for example pray to ask help, say thanks or simply as a ritual then imo you will ascribe human properties to god because it's more suitable to ask help or say thanks to a person.

How is that possible? Water exists mainly our of H20 molecules. Photons can't travel through H2O-molecules without interacting with them. Light is propagated in water via absorbing and reemitting of photons. 'The fact' that absorbing/reemitting of photons doesn't go instantaneously is why the speed of light in water is slower then c. A medium like water is really a collection of a huge number of tiny electrons and protons/neutrons. I asked this because I wonder how the absorbing/reemitting works.(which causes light propagation) And I'm wondering if the speed of light slows down, if you go deeper in an ocean.

How does light propagation in water works?

Not really.The Gospels don't make an narrative more convincing. They basically create the narrative. The nativity of Jesus in Bethlehem and Jesus living in Nazareth are only told in the Gospels.

The strange thing...many people believe in Jesus' existence because the stories of Jesus are written in great detail...….this is the main reason the stories are made up.

You are wrong. Evidence and proof used in science are not necessary 'scientific'. The meaning of evidence and proof changes depending on the context the words are used in.

I don't know what happens in the video. All there is is your assessment as shocking. No, that's not enough. I see, then move this to the trash can

Isn't this enough text? "The baptism in Georgia is shocking. What's wrong with those people?"

The origin of DNA via natural means is not proven but it's very well understood. The collisions of atoms you can call 'random'...but the molecules that survive are not random. Have a look at this paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/ There is a massive amount. They are called 'transitional fossils'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

The baptism in Georgia is shocking. What's wrong with those people?

Quantum field theory is a theoretical frame work... Uncertainty is a main concept in QM, Einstein tried to debunk H U. The absence of hidden variables(bell's theorem) is also a main concept in QM. Einstein created a hidden variable theory but did not publish it. Relativity is created from a completely different point of view then QT.

Most theists think they have some form of interaction (by praying, serving, talking with God in dream or hallucinations) with their god, which causes people to ascribe human properties to their God concept...the same for people that belief in heaven/hell.

the Grizzly–polar bear hybrid is called Grolar bear (or Prizzly bear)and it occurs in the wild. It's an intermediate between Polar bears and Grizzly bears.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly–polar_bear_hybrid#Characteristics If Polar bears are bred with larger brown bears like Kamchatka brown bear or Kodiak brown bears, I can imagine that would be the strongest land dwelling animal of prey. This is about Ursid hybrids.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ursid_hybrid

I heard the same thing about the aggressiveness. But I think that depends on their diet. Many bears (in South-Alaska),British-Columbia and in East-Russia(Kamchatka ) gain most fat in the summer due to the salmon(or other fish) run or are adapted to eat sea food...while more continental bears are more omnivorous and eat whatever is present. In general, the more fatty food a bear has, the bigger his size but the lower his aggressiveness. They have for example noted that bears in Kamchatka are less aggressive then bears in Siberia. The biggest bear in Eurasia is probably the Kamchatka brown bear, he is slightly smaller then the Kodiak bear but the breadth of the skull is much greater.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamchatka_brown_bear

I think Polar bears are on average stronger then Brown Bears. They are nearly 100% carnivorous and hunt mostly for seals or other marine mammals. But they can also hunt for fsh.

Maybe a male moose?

I don't mean that this is for all models. When for example the holographic is 'proven' then other models are not disproven but lose their scientific value. That's your interpretation and you should read the OP again. I did not use the term 'scientific proof'.

If you mean 'Hindi': सनातन धर्म https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanātanī#Sanātana_dharma