Itoero

That's actually not a correct correction. The laws of the universe are what we say about the universe through experiments/empirical evidence.

These are the reasons I think a cooper pair or electrons in superconductor don't have(measurable) rest mass. -They travel without resistance (like a photon in vacuum) which imo means they travel in a wave and have only kinetic energy. This change in energy also explains why they form cooper pairs in a superconductor and not in a 'normal' conductor. You need a form of resistance to behave/travel like a particle….or to be measured like a particle -Rest mass is calculated via the rest energy. The relativistic mass is calculated via the total energy. We know bodies gain energy when velocity is increased. Then what's the meaning of rest mass at a point where a lot of energy is added through its velocity and it forms a composite boson while we know 'restmass' is problematic concept in bosons.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativityhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/31374/how-does-higgs-boson-get-the-rest-mass

Yes but do you have evidence that "Tigers have stood off packs of 50 dholes" The fact that you read something like that long ago is not evidence. Do you have evidence for that other then this writing? You should read Wikipedia with an critical mindset...especially such a subject. Why would dholes confront a tiger? Also, most dhole clans exist out of 12 individuals….it's known there are packs above 40. The fact that a tiger can climb such a pole doesn't mean he is a good treeclimber. The photos/videos about tiger climbing in a tree show how he is too heavy and wrongly built to climb trees.

Citation? Adult Tigers can climb trees, but they are not excellent tree climbers. They are too heavy and don't have a good built. In general, Leopards safely stay up the trees and Tigers rule the land.

I just found something interesting. Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) systems store energy in the magnetic field created by the flow of direct current in a superconducting coil which has been cryogenically cooled to a temperature below its superconducting critical temperature.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage#Advantages_over_other_energy_storage_methods Is this a way to store magnetic field energy without adding a body?

If you turn photons in matter or vice versa then you change the information, so those science fiction idea's are meaningless. "The theory of the Breit-Wheeler process says it should be possible to turn light into matter by smashing two particles of light (photons) together to create an electron and a positron. However, past attempts to do this have required the addition of other high-energy particles. Physicists from Imperial College London, led by Professor Steven Rose, came up with a way of testing the theory that did not rely on these added extras in 2014, and today an experiment is running in the hope of turning light directly into matter for the first time." https://phys.org/news/2018-03-underway.html

And where does this 'foundation' comes from? You can always ask: And where does that comes from?

You do know about atheist/homosexual discrimination done by Christians? And what about all the pedophile 'catholic' priests?

Yes, many people did that.

Today I learned about optogenetics. It's a biological technique that involves the use of light to control cells in living tissue, typically neurons, that have been genetically modified to express light-sensitive ion channels. It is a neuromodulation method that uses a combination of techniques from optics and genetics to control and monitor the activities of individual neurons in living tissue—even within freely-moving animals—and to precisely measure these manipulation effects in real-time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optogenetics By shining with a laser in a mouse-brain, they can activate neurons and change the behavior. Neuroscientists at Stanford University in California conducted their experiments on mice that were genetically engineered to have light-sensitive neurons in a brain region called the orbitofrontal cortex.https://www.nature.com/news/laser-used-to-control-mouse-s-brain-and-speed-up-milkshake-consumption-1.20995

The 'laws of the universe' don't have a physical presence. They concern what we say about the universe.

Backing your idea's up with imaginary consensus is something you also do in other threads. We once had a long discussion about determinism. There you also, for example said several times something like this: "All scientists believe in an indeterministic universe due to bells theorem". So now you acknowledge most of it is probably fantasy. That's something else then you said before. His birth and childhood stories are fantasy. The miracles are fantasy. All the detailed stuff is fantasy. So then which Jesus existed? Which of the stories are correct?

'be good'...you make an exception for this forum?

Yes, In that sense, you have two bodies.

No. a massive body

What does that matter?

Eise said R Carrier didn't do research...but he did. He is attached to academic institution and it's impossible to know his idea's are not well received by mainstream historians. Or do you know what historians in France, Belgium, Spain, Scandinavia and China think? Correct. The main reason I don't believe he existed is because the Gospels are written in great detail. Such details can only be written by eyewitnesses at the moment or in the days after. Yet the Gospels were written decades later.

When you place a body with mass in a gravit field then you have stored energy. No but the OP doesn't ask for gravitational energy. He asks how you store energy.

E=mc² ? That's wat I said....you need one particle/body.

Eise often backs up his claims with an imaginary consensus. He often claims to know what many/most/all scholars/historians/scientists think. If this is a scienceforum then his comments in this thread should get downvotes, but they don't, I'm again the one who gets downvotes for stating the truth.

I don't deny the validity of field-models. But you imo just need one body to have (measurable) energy...regardless of the field you are in.

Why do you need 2 bodies to store energy in a field? Doesn't every body contain energy? (E=mc²)

It seems Galileo toned down his claims to 'fool' the Inquisition. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06769-4

Here are 2 papers that concern geological evolution.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17819825https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18719275 On Wikipedia and other websites, geological evolution is often called 'geological history'.