Itoero

H2O is almost 2 times less dense then H2SO4. So the H2SO4 drops immediately bellow the water which dilutes the H2SO4 and the ionization happens bellow the water while it gets diluted.

Did life create oxygen?

An asteroid.

If all life dies, do you think abiogenesis can happen again?

If it's true that big bang cosmology implies a high degree of entanglement and entanglement builds space time then if you can somehow find entangled macroscopic objects which are light years separated, then perhaps you can create a system in which a change in gravity is instantly felt many light years apart. There are a lot of ifs

The matter in the universe was once a lot more compact, that might imply a high degree of entanglement of particles in the universe. This imo fits with the 'idea' that entanglement builds space time. Everything is entangled. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931200994X

My mam often talks with a capable woman. Many people often visit a psychiatrist.

I don't think we need religion (not anymore) but many people are in need for spirituality. Religion helped us to get where we are now.

It might be. But if this is true: "She can see super light shades of yellow and green properly I think. But if it's a regular color or darker, she seems them as opposite. Please try to understand" then she might have a sensitivity related problem because the eye is most sensitive for yellow and I think a bit less sensitive for green. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/56291-is-it-yellow-green-or-yellow-green-color-to-which-human-eye-is-most-sensitive/

Many univercities have a departement that specializes in eye-related research. Most of them have websites with contactinfo. http://www.ouh.nhs.uk/eye-hospital/default.aspx I contacted them a couple times and got an answer pretty fast. Another in San Diego: http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/contact-us You have to be a bit lucky to get help via e-mail.

Incorrect. Animals(other then humans) can communicate but that does not mean they have language....or maybe a very primitive form, compared to our kind of language.

I Think I found something that might explain why green-yellow and why she can see the difference when it's very light. "Seeing yellow is what happens when BOTH the green AND red cones are highly excited near their peak sensitivity. This is the biggest collective excitement that your cones ever have, aside from seeing pure white. Notice that yellow occurs at peak intensity in the graph to the right. Further, the lens and cornea of the eye happen to block shorter wavelengths, reducing sensitivity to blue and violet light. This, combined with the neuronal nirvana resulting from the overlapping sensitivity of the red and green cones, is why yellow appears to be the brightest color in the spectrum, making it a unique and useful color." I don't know what this really means... Perhaps you can mail a neuro ophthalmologist.

I'm sorry I insulted people. I know what I'm doing wrong. My scientific imagination is I think pretty good but it's often meaningless when it doesn't come with real evidence. I have an article that summarizes scientific research concerning the cause of homosexuality. http://www.viewzone.com/homosexual.html I'll quote some interesting stuff. "Homosexuality is a congenital condition much like being "left handed". Before you dismiss the analogy remember there were times in history when being left-handed (the archaic meaning of "sinister") meant you were possessed by evil." "Today we know that left handedness is the result of excess testosterone slowing the growth of the left-hemisphere in the developing fetal brain. It's not a choice. It's a condition. Ironically, homosexuality is caused much the same way as being left-handed. Instead of excess testosterone, the developing male fetus receives too little, often too late." "Another nuclei of the hypothalamus, INAH-3, reveals that heterosexual males have double the volume of both homosexual and female subjects." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INAH_3 "A review of current research shows that there is no evidence supporting a social cause for homosexuality. On the contrary, there are multiple studies, both with animals and humans, demonstrating the causative relationship with the pre-natal testosterone during a critical stage in "defeminization"." "Dr. Harry Harlow's famous studies with Rhesus monkeys demonstrated that such things as love and the ability to nurture healthy children was a learned skill that could be altered by after birth experiences. This non-biologic effect may play a role in female homosexuality and may also be a contributing factor in the degree to which congenital homosexuality is either expressed or repressed. But they do not cause homosexuality." "Male rats were exposed to prenatal (i.e. before they were born) or postnatal (after they were born) stress, or both. The prenatally stressed males showed low levels of male copulatory behavior and high rates of female lordotic responding (i.e. "lordotic" refers to mounting behavior which usually occurs during mating). Postnatal stress had no effect." "The present data support the hypothesis that exposure of pregnant rats to environmental stressors modifies the normal process of sexual behavior differentiation in male fetuses by decreasing functional testosterone and elevating androstenedione levels during prenatal development." This shows that prenatal stress increases the chance of homosexuality. Prenatal stress is known to be related wit premature birth: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2651684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179252/ So science shows prematurely born infants have a higher chance of being homosexual.

Again...Premature birth can increase the chance of becoming gay. I have scientific evidence for this but no time to post it. I found an article that summarizes scientific research on the cause of homosexuality.

There are treatments evolving to regrow/repair nerve tissue to increase sight...some of those treatments can probably reduce colour blindness. But she needs to see a capable neuro ophthalmologist to make sure she is colour blind. Aren't her parents helping her?

hehe That's very recognizable.

I doubt you'll find Acupuncture experts on a scienceforum.

That's a very simplistic view. Most people life their lives as best as they can, given the circumstances.

You seem to make a distinction between humans and animals.

You are not backing up your own claims....probably because you can't. Which laws prevent abiogenesis from happening? And which experimentation/observation rejects abiogenesis?

I'm atheist because my parents are atheists. I was educated like a Catholic at school. I often wonder how different I would be if my parents are and raised me Catholic.

This paper shows the induction of vitellogenin (increased because of neonicotinoid) suggests adverse effects on foraging activity, whereas creb and pka down-regulation may be implicated in decreased long-term memory formation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26990785 I found a paper where they tested neonicotinoidon on some bees but I can't refind it. If neonicotinoidon makes bees more vulnerable for stress, is it possible that effects of global warming increase the effect of neonicotinoidon ? In Canada (mostly in B.C.) the mountain pine beetle increased severely in number and killed many trees, mostly due to the warming climate. Perhaps other pathogens which can harm bees, increased in number as well.

Expression??? 'Dixit magister' is just a translation.

Why do you use latin phrases? To hide the fact that you have nothing useful to say? Will you keep your religitard nonsense for yourself?

What's wrong with your brain?