trevorjohnson32

They say an object has four dimensions x,y,z, and time, but if you stand far enough away from an object like say mars or another planet, its dimension of time or light isn't the same as its x,y,z, coordinates. Also say you were to find a church by its bells ringing. Wouldn't that create a 5th dimension of sound? or say a dog finds something by smell, 6? gravity waves? 7?

Sorry guys not buying it I'm reading ; "Yes electricity can "travel" through vacuum. But no one calls it arcing because there is no glow (no particles that can get excited -> no photons -> no glow, just invisible electrons). Vacuum tubes for example make use of electricity that is traveling through vacuum." Not to interupt your backscratching butt sniffing party or anything.

do you have a source on this? I'm reading something different the more I look into it.

See, this is consistently the problem with most of the people here. You guys may or may not be right, but you speak like arrogant bastards in a language that you understand, and I'm left to call it indecipherable word salad. I know what arcing is. The question is if it travels through empty space without any other medium, then does that make space conductive?

Then how come you can create arcing in a vacuum jar?

I'm asking if it can conduct electricity.

Just wondering what people think.

Gee only the friendliest of hospitality1 Why don't you learn something about not being an... By the way there are others on the internet who compile real evidence against your present authority in the matter and is generally agreed to be a philosophical debate not that I'm taking away from the 'facts' you're learning from others.

ssure thing boss

Agreed word salad is good for a bunch of jerks teaming up on me, you enjoy! Does this prove the importance of you on aforum talking to me?

cheer up guys I can't force my beliefs on you the way your doing to me with numbers because I'm just one person. If anyone has anything intelligent to say to me then I'll respond to there question, but if you can't be nice you shouldn't say anything.

10% world energy comes from dams.

Don't get frustrated man. Many of these people believe that things like gravity and light don't travel along space as a medium because of some terrible experiment from the 1800's that caused the theory of relativity. It is true that the faster you move through the universe the slower you will AGE. Time is a construct of man. The reason this happens is still UNEXPLAINED not in accordance with some of the brilliant scientists here who claim to have definite answers that you just don't understand because its too complex. On another forum a phd physics professor admitted that people pay big bucks for a 300 page college course on gravity that is full of silly maths. It is also true that gravity fields will have the same ageing effect as moving through space. I have heard that time dilation is caused by molecular activity that occurs at light speed. This activity has to travel in two different directions at light speed at once causing it to stop? and once the electrons? are stopped they seize to emit light? In my theory of gravity I say that a gravity field is an area of denser space. So an inch of space in a super gravity field may be take light a year to cross. In this same way the molecular activity has more space to cover and hence energy moves slower in its molecular form. another way fo thinking of it if you don't want to except that is there being like a space wind, like the one way directional wind when your hand is out the car window. A gravity field would then be compared to wind that you feel from just being outside. thats how wind is like gravity.

like what?

I guess sometimes the three objects meet in the middle of the triangle created by there three centers of gravity, and sometimes a line to the middle of the earth is longer considerably then a line between the feather and the cannonball. as such the two fall between almost two parallel lines causing them to appear to fall straight down like other things the big earth does like create flat earth blah bleh blehhhhhhhhh

Well here's something of a scientific proof of the theory since its hard to come up with an instrument that can directly measure the density of space. Gravity is often compared to the weights on a cloth experiment. The experiment only works because of the gravity below the cloth. If you draw a perspective drawing from above the image is the same as the one I have in the video.

tour sure spell your Youre not yur?

I didn't know that I was required to post responses to the absurd word salad of the other posters here. I can just generally say about any and all of the responses so far nothing has answered any of the questions I've asked. But to keep the thread alive for fun I'll read them again and try to pick something out.

Sorry guys, I know where your coming from and I'm not buying it. I have my own theory on how time dilation is caused. No need to ask for it like I'm sure your all frantically typing to do right now, I ll eventually post it.

So the force of gravity coming out of the earth is in proportion to the amount needed for an object depending on its mass so that it will fall at 9.8 m/s? Now who bases there logic only on what they can see? I suppose you thing gravity waves move at light speed as well....

Does anybody know the answer? Google searching why do two objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum, I found this: "The mass, size, and shape of the object are not a factor in describing the motion of the object. So allobjects, regardless of size or shape or weight, free fallwith the same acceleration. In a vacuum, a beach ballfalls at the same rate as an airliner." The three objects: the earth, a feather, and a cannonball, would all move toward each other in ratio to there size? So if you replace the earth with say a brick, and you put each thing at the corner of an equilateral triangle, the three objects wouldn't meet in the middle, the feather would move the most and the brick second but all three would move towards each other. Same thing with the earth, except the earth is so big it appears that the two objects fall and land at the same time, while in reality all three objects move towards each other.

Oh so what causes time dilation is.... I'm sure you know about thtwo clocks. Here's another one, so according to your belief in GR if one should fall to his face on earth, there is no way of telling if you fell or the earth came up and hit you in the face since objects only move relative to each other. pretty absurd logic or I guess its just my intuition questioning what I see.

I believe the universe is a single object and not infinite. From a great distance outside our universe we are just another indivisible cube of super dense space that causes gravity in that universe. So the universe does not create a reference frame for objects in spite of the fact that two clocks travelling at two different speeds will tell time differently? If they weren't slowed down by the passing through space alone then what else causes the clocks to read differently? Yeah, I believe time dilation exists, is that what you mean time dilation has passed every test? There are some pretty basic logical questions that general relativity doesn't pass.

So is time dilation caused by an objects movement through space or what do you think causes it? Do objects create a reference frame by moving around each other? and GR states that you can't tell if an object is at rest or moving only that it appears to be moving in relation to other objects, Is that right? Do you believe this stuff?

That's fine that you have no imagination, I guess. Am I really supposed to learn something from this response? Why don't you just say I don't know, it would be a heck of a lot more true the WS you've posted. And, just for fun, what is the scientific reason you can't travel faster then light speed?