Raider5678

No offense, I could show you sooooooooooo many times when Obama, Hillary, Trump, Ted Cruz, and just about EVERY SINGLE POLITICIAN, Republican and Democrat, answered questions like this when they CLEARLY should have just answered the first time. Like seriously, you pick THIS out of all of them. Hillary Clinton was asked multiple times if she was guilty in the "e-mail" scandal, and she avoided the question the ENTIRE time, and never answered at one of her interviews. If your being accused of something, and no matter what you say you will receive backlash for it, its common to just avoid the question. If this makes him guilty, then screw it, every politician is guilty.

I don't think he was heading in that direction, I think he was heading more in the direction of, we aren't animals, because we are the #1 species.

Thank you for clearing that up. +1

The only thing that separates us from most of the animal kingdom is our intelligence. Doesn't mean we aren't animals.

You have your issues backwards. She signed the affidavit after the "evaluation."

Then tension is still there, even if you make the cable in segments. Adding platforms will only increase the tensile stress.

Yes, yes there is and you caferrofluid. Its actually called ferro fluid. Homemade ferrofluid.

Yes, I looked into this a lot, its actually quite interesting IMO. What do you think? Anyway, refer to my previous posts.

http://lawnewz.com/video/the-truth-about-clintons-handling-of-kathy-shelton-rape-case/" Court documents show that as part of her defense strategy in the case, Clinton filed a motion for a psychiatric examination of Shelton. Clinton also signed a sworn affidavit that claimed Shelton was emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing. The affidavit also accused Shelton of having made false accusations against others in the past. Unless I'm missreading,Court documents. If she hadn't signed this,then the case would have gone in a dramatically different direction.

Ok, fair enough.If this were true though, wouldn't that be something you brinup in court, or is that just making a random remark about a 12 year olds sexual fantasies? Ah, ok.I would personally like to point two things out. It wasn't approved by the court, yet Clinton used evidence from this physch examination. Unless she didn't and the court records were modified? Or she made up evidence.

Not sure, perhaps I misread something. Where was this? Also, in any event this would also prove that Hillary completely and utterly made up evidence. You can use evidence from an exam that never happened, or am I wrong because I am not a liberal or conservatist?

Except she could provide no evidence to where she "was informed." In court, one would provide the source of the evidence, no just say, I was informed. More like, I was informed by, such and such, who used such and such information, to prove such. Just kinda the way courts where I'm at usually go. They often provide evidence before saying I was informed. Unless, I am wrong and at courts other places evidence is completely pointless, thus defeating my entire argument. And all cases ruled by that court.

She falsely said the the victim had previously brought up false accusations against people. Which is a lie, there are none on record. And if you decide to argue that just because they were not on record doesn't mean they didn't happen, then that would effectively denounce most arguments about her e-mail ehhh, issue. Also, to add to my previous points, she also made the remark to the twelve year old accusing her of seeking out older men. Entirely right, true and completely appropriate.

Context does matter. And as I pointed out, how 2 different people interpret the context and the remarks is entirely up to them. I personally am not accusing her of laughing, the sites did and I simply brought it up all with them. What I AM accusing her of is falsely defending a rapist by lying.

Agreed, but lying is not legal in the defense or prosecution of anyone. But she lied saying the victim had made false accusations before, that isnt legal, hence making it controversial IMO. Let me rephrase thatI have a personal hate for people who defend rapist through lies, bribery, and dirty tricks. This is not narrowed to Hillary Clinton. No, I'm accusing her of lying, in a court, which isn't legal. Do not strawman me, intentionally or not intentionally. That is ABSOLUTELY true. But the quote is real, which is why I pointed it out.

So there's a story out the Hillary laughed at a 12 year old rape victim.(Trump brought up the issue) She also tried to push that Shelton, the rape victim, get a "psychiatric exam" There's an audio recording but nobody can tell EXACTLY what Hillary was laughing at. So then politifact took that and decided that it was a lie, because, nobody can tell for CERTAIN. They're evidence was Hillary Clinton saying she didn't, and that's all they needed. Other sources have claimed that she got the accused racist off. Then others defend that she didn't. https://thinkprogress.org/the-truth-about-kathy-shelton-the-12-year-old-rape-victim-trump-used-to-attack-hillary-clinton-72158e3c41cb#.gkbxw0sis What they don't mention is that the rapist got off with LESS THEN A YEAR in prison.(personal opinion, not long enough. I'm sure someone will argue.) Oh yeah, The 12 year old's victim's word means nothing, even though she, came out claiming the same thing as Trump. And while some argue she DID NOT laugh at the victim, some interpret that way. http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/ That's 2 websites, with no contradicting evidence, taking two different opinions on it. And one has statements made by the victim. This one tho, is just sad. http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/rape-victim-hillary-clinton-laughed-blamed-getting-raped/ "When Clinton was representing Taylor, she ordered that Shelton undergo a 12-hour-long psychiatric evaluation to determine if she was “mentally unstable,” and reportedly said the child rape victim had a tendency to “seek out older men,” according to The Daily Mail." Because......victim blaming. Obviously 12 year old girls seek out older men to rape them. Don't they all? Hillary Clinton ✔@HillaryClinton "To every survivor of sexual assault...You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We're with you." —Hillary 1:24 PM - 14 Sep 2015 Twitter As some here say, I call Bull. And the NEVER ending call for proof, here. http://lawnewz.com/video/the-truth-about-clintons-handling-of-kathy-shelton-rape-case/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/trump-says-clinton-laughed-about-rape-case/ http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-presidential-debate-fact-check/2016/10/trump-is-wrong-hillary-clinton-did-not-laugh-about-the-rape-of-a-12-year-old-229455 http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/trump-says-clinton-laughed-about-rape-case/ 3 sites, based on Hillary's word as evidence. https://thinkprogress.org/the-truth-about-kathy-shelton-the-12-year-old-rape-victim-trump-used-to-attack-hillary-clinton-72158e3c41cb#.inazklcc9 Failed to point out half the evidence and left out large portions of the story. Because, that's what republicans do. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/09/why-donald-trump-just-attacked-hillary-clinton-for-defending-an-accused-child-rapist-explained/ quote from here. "I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body.” This was proven that she lied. the defendant had never made an prior accusations that were ever put on record. And that type of thing usually gets put on record. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/hillary-attacks-credibility-of-12-year-old-rape-victim-laughs I just put this in because I know you will hate it. I wouldn't take evidence from this as its obviously biased. http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/rape-victim-hillary-clinton-laughed-blamed-getting-raped/ I have a personal hate for people who defend rapists, god forbid.

Would you be willing to come to Pennsylvania and my home town? I'll gladly let you tell my town that.

They did win 100%. And if you honestly believe that 19000\19000 in every district voted for Obama, then your stereotyping them. Because then your believe that just because they're black they voted for a black president. And I don't believe that all of them did, twice.http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/dr-martin-luther-kings-niece-endorses-donald-trump-believe-many-things-hes-saying/ Saw this in the news. Not related but figured was worth showing.

Agreed. +1

I know people who live in some of those districts, and their die hard conservatists. Heck, my neighbor was in one of those districts and he's constantly complaining about republicans, but he admits that while he loves Obama, it was definitely foul play somewhere. And I have no reason why nobody stood up and spook out, but there is lots and lots of things where people should speak out and don't. Again, whether you believe me or not, I know too many people who believe its true. But that doesn't matter. The point is that the people in MY town believe it, and if Hillary wins and anything remotely close to a rigged election comes out, there will be hell to pay.

Yeah, the biggest problem is that philly pa has 59 register precincts with 100% Obama votes, yet so many of them "claimed" sometimes violently, that they didn't. Obviously they're lying, Obama got 100% of their votes. Oh, and in places of Ohio. And more that I don't care to list. Obviously nothing going on here. And no, I'm not voting for trump because I want peace. Are you voting for Hillary because you want peace?

If Hillary wins, there will be a war. At least from my perspective. From a nations perspective massive civil unrest doesn't constitute a war. From a bystander, watching armed people shooting at police and the army, it is a war. And believe me, people will die in my town if she gets elected. Maybe only the truly insane ones, but I wouldn't be surprised if a large number of "sane" people did. Yep. My town is not the place you want to be if Hillary gets elected. Anyways, I don't support Hillary, for reasons I won't share because I'm sure you don't care to hear them. But what I was wondering, is there any truth to this: http://www.inquisitr.com/3225440/hillary-clinton-means-war-says-vladimir-putin-to-frightened-russian-people-american-militarism-has-a-female-face/ http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2039.htm http://observer.com/2016/06/she-isnt-president-yet-but-russia-already-hates-hillary-clinton/ http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2016/05/putin-if-its-hillary-ill-nuke-america-he-was-not-joking-2806144.html http://feelthesmashysmashy.newsvine.com/_news/2016/05/16/35548878-breaking-president-putin-warns-america-if-its-hillary-clinton-its-war-endingfed-news-network http://endingthefed.com/breaking-president-putin-warns-america-if-its-hillary-clinton-its-war.html Whether you deny it or not, Valadmir Putin did say this, but do you actually think he would follow through on this?

What he said.

In order to reproduce, it was my understanding you required a person of each sex.Homosexual couples can't have children, unless there's a third person carrying the child, or providing fertilization. Did I miss the point where evolution made it so homosexual couples can have kids without anyone else?

I'm 90% certain you meant to say good thing, not food thing. Unless your really hungry. And that still doesn't explain it. Anyway, the guy attempted to shoot robbers. He continued to shoot at them as they ran away. He could have hit like 5-6 citizens easily, and missed the robbers entirely. He did make a difference though, which is pretty much all moontanman said about it.