Raider5678

Slavery in the bible, wasnt for life unless done so willingly. They were suppose to release them after a couple of years,(less then 10). And they weren't suppose to beat them, and if they did, they had to give him time to recover etc. It was actually a lot less brutal then southern slavery was, but it was still slavery. Also, 10% - 15% of Muslims are shias. Shias are the radical muslims if you didn't know.

I relent.

You could also just go to a religious school.

Statement one Is half true, but science is not "wacky" Statement two is just outright false.

Actually it does have a note that it skips generations but it was lost in translatiooff..You would know that if you didn't nod off While this is true, you would yet to disprove Adam and Eve. Comparing them to bigfoot or lochness seems like a way to just avoid it. I know it's Russels teacup but hey, still works.

Its hard to argue with you, as you think that simply dissmissing the idea is proof its fake. In the time the geaneologies were written it was common practice to skip plenty of generations. That's historical comparison. If that's how geaneologies were written in that time period, surely you can assume the same of the ones in the bible? Or do you saying it wouldn't mean its not true? The word yalad in the Hebrew language can be translated to begat. Inside the bible, begat is commonly used to signify relations, but they dont have to be direct. Inside the Hebrew language there's also a mark they would put front of the geaneologies to mean several generations were skipped. And not just one or two, but significant numbers of generations. This mark was placed many times in the genesis geaneologies. But I'm sure your going to argue that because you don't believe it eh? Because your the best Hebrew translator ever? And the "sources" you mentioned don't prove anything. They just make assumptions, using the same estimations i disproved. In what way am I ignoring your question? Please, answer! And your dismissing this because you don't want to answer? You can't prove Adam and Eve weren't the first humans. Your previous argument was that the possibility of two human beings showing up in a pair was impossible. If God made them, can you honestly say its impossible? You can't disprove God. You can't prove God. Its called russels teacup. Simply dismissing everything I say because I'm "young and inexperienced" kind of seems rude.

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c015.html This offers some information. http://www.revelation.co/2009/06/19/does-the-bible-say-earth-is-flat-or-round/

I know a friend who got pulled over for a speeding ticket, and the officer wanted to see her licence and registration. She told the officer she had a gun in the glove apartment and the licence and registration was in there too. The officer said ok, told her to step out of the car, and got the licence and registration himself with her permission. Problem solved.

The writers of Job knew the earth was round. So did isiah. And its hinted about in Luke. Just because you say its speculative doesn't mean it is. It IS founded by historical comparisons and translators of the Hebrew language, along with several examples and proof is provided. Once again, I don't see why its extremely unlikely. Also, why is it "impossible" that Adam and Eve were the first humans? Your evolution theory doesn't really work because according to us its god. Say in the likely hood of 2 humans showing up in a pair is extremely small doesnt say anything about that.

Regarding the rape questions, you seem to be taking out other factors.No matter how women dress there will be rape. It how they dress compared to everyone else that I personally believe matters. If 99% of the women in a country covered themselves from head to toe, and the other percent wore bikinis everywhere, who do you think is gunna get raped first? Also, the blm protesters are quite obviously just protesting without full information. Take Michael Brown for example. People were rioting and complaining like there was no tommorow. Did you know he assaulted the cop, broke his orbital eyesocket, before he got shot? The medical report for the officer shows proof michael brown assaulted him, but did the media say even one word about that? And to blame the officer is kind of ludicrus. If some dude, obviously stronger then you, assaulted you, beat your face in breaking your orbital eyesocket, and mind you that probably hurts, and you had a gun, would you shoot? There are a number of officers that I know of who were in the legal bounds to shoot, but didn't, and as a result died, were injured, or were seriously put in danger. In some situations there's only 2 choices for them. Shoot or don't shoot. One has the obvious outcome, the other one has two possible outcomes. 3 outcomes, only 1\3 preferable. I went to police camp for a while. I know that's not the full experience, but they still do basically the same training the police go through for a week. One of the big training parts is how to respond to a situation. Usually they're planned situations and are meant to teach you to stay calm, but if your calm during a situation, isn't that better then panicking? Not everybody knows the full extent of every case,but at least look up details then just overall statistics.

Wow dude. I'm a creationist and even I see that your not understanding a thing. Simple terms, it can't be more simple then this. According to this theory, ID: Life was created. It was created by something, be it a God or an alien.(obviously leaning towards god). The end. What don't you understand?

And if you simply reread the argument, your assuming you won because you don't like the evidence memammal. That's why I'm not bothering to argue against you. Maybe I don't Accept all the facts, but then neither do you.

Dark matter was created to explain why the universe is expanding I thought... Though, I might be wrong.

Brand new drakes equation! Wait no, we would still keep it. We'll just change the variables.

Hello. I recently found out there are some people who don't believe in moon landings. I decided to researched it to see why and now I'm finding myself in dout of them being real. One of the biggest, is why are there no stars in the picture? Another one I'm wondering about is why are there multiple light sources? Shouldn't the sun be the only light to make shadows? Here's a link to the main arguments http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/ Please please please explain these. Their making me dout the moon landings.

Oh yeah, cause this is gunna work well. The guy who robs a bank, by does it peacefully. No sentence, because he's not a danger. The dude who stalks a girl. No punishment, he's not a danger, well, at least you can't prove he is. The man who tortures animals for his pleasure. No punishment, he's not a danger! Yeah. I can definitely tell you really thought about how this would work. And who's gonna go into the punishment business? If the governments not in it, regulations will drop for sure. The poor will be punished and the rich will not. Yep. That's the kind of country I want to live in, don't you?

Annnnnnd again. They calculated the age assuming there were no gaps.

https://bible.org/seriespage/6-coming-grips-genealogies-genesis-51-32

There's a sequel? Also, do you know the percentage of planets that would have these conditions? It may have been in the paper but to be honest it lost me in some areas.

I made that bit up? Get this straight, when we read that that's what we were taught. And I'm done with you. A quote from someone, Do not argue with a fool. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I'll go with this. I just have a hard time when the person who accuses me of starting arguments(memammal) continues to say stuff about the religion. And should we reply then it was obviously us who started the argument.

Oh yeah. Instead we should just let you say what ever you want and sing kumbaya around a fire eh? And if we dare challenge something, then were immediately anti science freaks bent on destroying the world in the sadistic way of un education. And should we actually prove a lie you were saying, then its just something that some nutjob was saying and got lucky. All the time if we do just stand around a fire singing, then we're ignoring you because we "know" we're wrong. We do one thing wrong and you hold us up to a standard 10x higher then the normal person, and if we don't meet that standard? Then we're liars and thrives, and enjoy nothing better then to attack you. So what would you have us do? "Fight back"? Just ignore you? Nothing we do will ever be good enough. Your only goal is trying to tell people they're wrong about religion. So I have questions for you. What's your purpose in life? Is it to do what I mentioned? Is it perhaps to better the world? What's your thoughts on things above your understanding? Are they simply not real? Miracles that are impossible to dismiss, what do you say about them? If you find religion so painfully obviously wrong, why do you bother to tell people about it? What is it that you'll never be content until you've done so? Were you there 2 million years ago, that you can so accurately without a shadow of a dout, tell me exactly what was happening? Are there no holes in your theory of evolution? Is it a perfect theory that you wouldn't ever imagine that there could be imperfections in it? Were you the brilliant mind who advances science? Or are you the mind that uses it to simply prove your smarter and better then everyone else? There's holes in science, and there's holes in religion. You'll just have to accept that. I gave you my counter argument. Your basing me being wrong on the findings of someone I proved in accurate. 6000 years is false, accept that. There's proof if you would just open your eyes. Look at my post and any fool can see that I presented an argument that you choose to ignore.

You can do a test of some sort I'm sure.

Are you implying we put nuclear waste inside of lead lined capsules to stop the radiation, And with the resulting heat from that make a heat source?

One word. Avatar. Not sure if you saw the movie, but a world like that would be awesome.