Raider5678

Here's a few links. Mostly self explanatory. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/oct/05/joe-scarborough/msnbcs-joe-scarborough-tiny-fraction-crimes-commit/ http://gun.laws.com/illegal-guns/illegal-guns-statistics http://www.gunfacts.info/gun-control-myths/crime-and-guns/ Whats up with this link? Are they all lies or something? http://www.rense.com/general32/nine.htm BTW, these are just a bunch of links. I'm not trying to actively defend anyone or debate anyone.

I meant that if you watch the end of the video, you can seriously see that she thinks Caucasian shouldn't be used because it represents superiority rather then a racial classification. Which in a way it does, but still.

Ok. Some things aren't connected, so we don't bother drawing connections between them. Hence, coincidence.

Say your arm accidently gets cut off. Does that mean it grows back? After a while, what are the chances of having all your limbs? And what if everyone evolves and your left behind? That would be awkward. Imaging ULTIMATE segregation if the entire world was made immortal. The in evolved ones left behind as the evolved ones do what ever. That's an odd scenario....

Wait, so if your classify yourself as Caucasian the your racist?(according to the video). Because it "separates them from everyone else" and "makes them seem connected in a way other races aren't". . Lost. It's still a classification, just like "negro" or "china-men." They both separate them, and both make the groups seem like they have something the others don't(good or bad). Does that make her racist or everyone racist?

Ok, I lost you here. What's your problem?

Well, judging from context clues I believe your suffering from minor depression, and if not that, then something else. I'm not mental heath expert, so don't take me seriously. Either way, another problem is that you have no feeling of accomplishment. You seem to believe that you couldn't even graduate highschool, and that your only an avererage player in the games that you like to play. You having no work experience probably plays a role in that, but I can't say for sure. Maybe try and find a job. Mc Donalds, or any job at all is usually a good start, and its fairly simple to do basic work like lawn mowing or something. From context clues I'm assuming you live in the united states BTW. Even starting a garden can help with this. If your cash strapped then I would suggests job, but its your life. If you want, I would suggest finding something to accomplish, then doing it.

When did I say facts? I said, "argument". Since when is the death penalty illegal in all states? Only in some. And if right and wrong are decided by the law, does that mean you've done a 180 now? Once again. Who decides what's right and what's wrong? Its. A. Penalty.

Did he change his name or was his account deleted?

Don't we all? I presented multiple arguments and all you did was focus on minor details of pointing them out to be wrong. Question, who decides what's right or wrong? You completely ignored me on this.

It seems I lost you somewhere. I thought I understood your first post, and I can follow all the mathematics, but what does this find? Does it find the number of squares that can be multiplied to become that number or is it something else? I'm loamerica. P.S your definitely more advanced then most 12th graders here in america.

I once debated with someone, I think it was inow, but Im not sure, whether or not harsher punishments would do anything. They argued it did absolutely nothing what so ever because "nobody: EVER thought about the consequences. Would you say this is an anomaly in Japan?

We are omnivores. We just have to be versatile, not have claws and sharp teeth. Hence again, were omnivores. Another point is that if a species understands this, then they would most likely be sentient, and understand that sentient creatures are the most dangerous.

Woah O.O

Reasonably right, but not entirely so. The speed limit doesn't matter for point of view, only the distance covered in a given amount of time.

As long as it solves everything the current model solves, and then some, it might work. At least that's the current criteria.

Interesting.

I would say that morality is based on majority opinion, and that its subject to change.

No offense, but what does this have to do with it?China allows homosexuality. Look at the company we're keeping by allowing it?

Nah. I'm seriously contemplating this.

I'm confused... Why wouldn't I believe that?Do you not believe them O.O Just kidding, I know what your getting defensive about. I said I was never a big believer in climate change, as in I never really argued about it with anyone. I already knew it was real. Its undeniable.

No. I was never really big into believing climate change was real so I figured I might as well look it up in my free time.

Oh, I'm sorry. When was the last time a right wing politician strapped a bomb to his back and ran out and blew some people up?

Oh really? Evidence.I already know about the neighbor part. But when there are 20000 times more neighbors then terrorists, don't you think that's biased?

I found these links while deciding to take a look at climate change. https://www.skepticalscience.com/heading-into-new-little-ice-age-intermediate.htm https://www.skepticalscience.com/heading-into-new-little-ice-age.htm I was wondering the vadidity of what they said.