Raider5678

Think of it this way. 1 odd reading = 1 odd reading possibly instrument error. 16 odd readings from 16 different instruments that all have the exact same pattern = A pattern. It is not instrument error.

So......yeah. They did exactly as I said. They hacked the democrats emails and documents, and posted crazy shit on face book. Their hack, was an influence campaign. They didn't hack votes or anything. They just let out information.

I'm gonna get a billion negative votes for this. But I'll do it anyway. How did the extremely advanced Russian hack team rig the election? Well they hacked the democrats emails and documents, and let the public read them to see what they thought about it. In shorter terms. They posted crazy shit on Facebook.

There are some pretty big spiders buddy. Plus, they probably floated in the wind.

Yes. It's proof I just did what that cat in your profile is doing.

Atheists, would be the biggest hurdle. I'm not the one who gave you the -1 though. I'll +1 it though so it evens out.

Wait. It's a time traveling conspiracy. The wealthy have the ability to manipulate time. And they use it to make billions of dollars. Forget one day. They're rigging everything! We know how Trump won now.

I actually get chills on a regular basis, multiple times almost every day. It doesn't bother me much. I'm not sure why, but as I googled it it mentioned about an infection. I have an infection under my skin, and it's been there for months. I'm currently taking medication to cure it, but it's already caused massive tissue damage that will likely never fully heal. But the reason I'm getting chills might have to do with that. But either way, if they persist, do as Phi says and go to a medical professional. You don't want what I got.

Basically saying, that they have a device that can predict the future. So yeah. Insanity.

Yeah, automating things typically results in doing the thing you're used to the most. It happens to me fairly often. Multi-task, or think about a few things at once rather then one thing at a time? I feel like they're different. Because one requires physically moving and one requires simply thinking.

Yeah, I figured that would include multiple thought processes. So I'm not actually thinking 3 things at once, I'm switching between them really really quickly and I don't notice? I can actually believe that, since the brains neurons move incredibly quickly.

Hello everyone, I was recently talking with someone and when they weren't fully focused I asked what was wrong, and they replied they were thinking about what they were going to do after school. Now this surprised me, because frankly I don't understand how it's so hard to talk and think about what you're going to be doing later at the same time. This happens fairly often, and while I didn't realize it before it occurred to me that some people can have more thought processes going through their mind at a time. So I thought about this for a while, and while asking my brother questions, I found he could only think of one major subject at a time. If you asked him to do math, and then talked about a youtube video with him, he couldn't do it. But he could simultaneously think about what he might have for dinner, and what he might have for breakfast. Now technically, I don't know if he was thinking back and forth between them quickly, but he can at least function on that while talking about breakfast and still have an answer on what he wanted for dinner at the end of the conversation. I was wondering, for most of you, how many complicated things can you think of at once? I can think of three, and at four I usually start to get confused and lose focus. For example, I can think about what my best friend meant when she said some things, what I have to do during school that day, and how much total gross income I'll make at my job this summer. But if I think of more, I usually get too confused to actively think about each one. How many things can you typically think about at one time? I'm thinking the average would be two, because not everyone seems to get confused when talking as often as others. But I understand how easily this could be biased. so I'm asking.

LMGTFY Chills (shivering) may occur at the beginning of an infection and are usually associated with a fever. Chills are caused by rapid muscle contraction and relaxation. They are the body's way of producing heat when it feels cold. Chills often predict the coming of a fever or an increase in the body's core temperature. Whether you felt cold or not, your internal body temperature could have been even a fraction of a degree off and you would have gotten a chill.

No it is not. For all we knew, there could be tiny variables we just can't control, that would affect the coin toss. He wanted to test it.

Funny you left out that little piece of information. And actually, you have no proof. Not solid proof at least. Go to a actual eye doctor and get help from him.

I don't know. Perhaps that's why the wanted to test it? I mean. Since you know the outcome of the experiment before the out come of the experiment, why didn't you publish an article explaining and proving the theory, without actually proving it?

Alright. Fair enough.

Yeah, I've been taught to leave a good tip for people if they're friendly/nice. I once went to a restaurant on Christmas eve, and saw a waiter trying to wait on tables and keep her young child behaving by sitting quietly in the corner. Nobody seemed to be tipping her because she didn't refill drinks until directly pulled aside, and even then took a while to get back. When we left, since it was only 4 of us and the meal wasn't too expensive, I gave a 150% tip(about $70) with a note that said Merry Christmas. I don't always tip just because they're nice or good to me. Sometimes they seem like they really need it. Christmas Eve, probably a single mom, with no baby sitter, and having to wait on more tables then one can easily do, she needed it. Is it ethical to simply tip the server if they give you high quality service or are eye candy to you? Sometimes your best simply isn't enough. And you protesting them getting paid so little by making sure they get paid even less doesn't seem very ethical to me, regardless how you frame it.

I wrote an ethics essay on this. In it, I discussed people who volunteer or donate with a self gaining motivation. Everyone else in the class wrote about how this was wrong and that people shouldn't do it. I presented the argument that even if you have something to gain from it, you're still helping people. And that as long as nobody gets hurt from what you gain, then I don't care if people do it for selfish reasons. I just respect them more if they do it without anything to gain. Would you agree?

Yep. No bias there.

The bias doesn't extend to the ones previous?

I know. But try telling them that.

What are you talking about. Click the page. Right at the top it says: by Inside Edition 4:28 PM EST, January 20, 2017 What's that stand for? The date the author pissed his pants? I mean. Come on. That's literally the most pathetic argument you've ever made. Somebody tell me I'm not blind. That clearly reads January 2017 and not September 2016. I mean, I'm assuming you mistook something and aren't making shit up, but now you're corrected.

And all that is counted by the terrible and pointless(I swear, if so much as one person quotes me on this saying I'm wrong, I'm gonna freak out.) statement that: God has his reasons for everything. So it's hard to argue the ethical standpoint.