Raider5678

Huh. Okay.

Quick break-off, I mean sentient as in having the ability to A: Think logically B: Have emotion C: Be able to communicate with a language of some sort. Only humans meet all three. But yes, I consent. There are animals that have the ability to use logic, some have emotion, and others can talk somewhat. But none can do all three. Even on a base level. For the most part, you're right though.

*innocently stops the Latin insults* I'm done here. But, you should know there are good people. There are bad people, and good people. Most people are normal people. If you wanted everyone to burn and die because a few bad people, you're one of those bad people.

I have. I launched a frickin political party.

Animals are not sentient, Stultus minima minded.

Yes. Stultus bimuli tremula.

There are people starving to death in other countries. People being brutally tortured their entire life. People being eaten alive by parasites. People suffering from mental diseases beyond the scope of your tiny mind. And you care about the dogs. Go somewhere where you can actually experience some discomfort, and stop worrying about the animals.

SCELUS!

You have a God complex. You think you're superior to everyone else, and when somebody does the tiniest thing against you, you act like they should die and burn in hell for all of eternity. You can't deal with anyone not thinking you're perfect, and you think you're somehow this thing that's different from everyone else. You thought you had special cells that could heal a hamstring overnight. That's plain dumb. You're not really depressed. You're a spoiled brat.

There. Started a political party. Now just need some good old fashion manipulation to get started.

You have a god complex.

Prove I can't think for myself?

E Evidence for such?

No, I meant that you replied with something I already addressed. I have no problem thinking for myself.

Clearly, you missed my previous post.

What deems something a fetish and a dysfunction? I'd think that they were both simply something that turns that person on. Also, if some random guy exposed himself to your daughter, would you consider that funny? I don't think it would hurt my pastor. I'd assume he wouldn't care. It's my religious parents that would.

My instinct is to kill people whenever I get angry. Also, this is getting off topic.

I understand that there's a lot of different fetishes. The only ones I categorize people with are the ones who like young kids, those who like raping people, and those who like exposing themselves to others. I find those disturbing. Consequently, so does the law.

In dreams, anything is possible. Those equations could be meaningless nonsense, and you wouldn't know it.

I had a bad habit of questioning everything. Got me in a lot of trouble. I always wondered about the age thing. I don't know how well that rule was followed in your time, but in my school it doesn't appear to have much effect on whether they do or not, just how well they hide it.

I am now familiar with it. It's not odd. Actually, I was taught that love in any form except vanilla sex between a husband and wife is wrong, demoralized, and will result you burning in hell. I read the Bible, and I decided as long as they both agree on something it's fine. This isn't what I was referring to, but here's this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3439299/I-fried-piece-rump-steak-ate-sprouts-German-cannibal-ate-gay-lover-permission-describes-went-killing-eating-him.html I think we can agree less then 1% believe this to be arousing, and therefore could be considered odd?

I know this is a Christian article, therefore biased, but ignoring the one time where they say it's wrong because it's not God's plan, it does offer sound science on the physchological effects of porn. It also has 2 videos about studies done on porn which are not Christian. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/9-things-you-should-know-about-pornography-and-the-brain I'm not trying to turn this into a relgious debate. Just saying porn does have side effects, including higher risk of depression, low motivation, concentration problems, social anxiety, and erectile dysfunction. I'll admit, I used to do porn. I experienced 4/5 of these problems, and once I quit I had a period of time with erectile dysfunction. But once I did quit I could focus more on school, I had a higher self esteem, I was no longer depressed, and I actually started experimenting in the social side of life. On top of that, I avoided getting involved in any relationship while I was doing porn simply because I couldn't do both and not feel like shit. Now I'm happily in one, and I don't feel like shit. Maybe it was a coincidence and my depression just happened to go away on it's own, but I'm not gonna bother testing it.

If the consent of all parties involved is given, I suppose anything goes. And while I agree, there are things that are odder then watching porn with a partner, I don't particularly see the appeal in that. As Zapatos said, personal bias. Some people find cutting off their genitals a huge turn on, I'm sure you'd agree that that's personal opinion. But, given that it's not what the majority find appealing, "odd" which in this context means different, could be coined. Now I'm not familiar with how common watching porn with a partner is, but I'd say if it's below 1% you could coin the term odd.

Typically, porn is watched alone. If you watch it with your wife(which seems odd, but hey. Do what you want.) then the social aspect is inserted and it doesn't matter. The studies done on porn are usually for if you watch it alone. Look them up.

Theories. We have theories, but no actual evidence. And even the theories are hard to believe.