Raider5678

I believe it would be better if sprayed as a small mist, but then you wouldn't be able to see it well. If it was sprayed heavier, so that you could see it, the coloring agent would easily be picked up by the dog and probably counter act the purpose of the training itself. So I'm not sure.

In the 1960's there was a constant fear that a nuclear war would start. Not like now, where it crosses your mind occasionally. No, it was constantly on the radio, people were talking about it, and a lot of people actually thought the world would end. There were close calls were nuclear weapons were almost launched, but the dread of a dead world somehow managed to keep humanity from annihilating itself. As radical as I see Trump, I don't see him stupid. If he launches nukes he's as good as dead. And he knows that. I don't think he wants to spend the rest of his days in an underground bunker hoping radiation doesn't leak through.

What about sentient life without religion?

Again, I'm attempting to make a field. Is it possible to make it in the form of "towers" or something that would trap the magnetic field without actually physically having metal there or something?

Might I just say, had they simply said that with telephones and communications, this world would have no radio, internet, cell phones, and so much more. So perhaps before simply saying take the easy and conventional method, imagine all the wonderful possibilities wireless electricity would create. If all the inventors throughout history didn't bother to try and make things easier because there were simpler ways, nothing would have been done. So sensible or not, this is what I'll do.

There's an interesting video on that too.

Wireless electricity over long range dude. That's what I'm talking about. And that still doesn't answer my question.

An alternating current can be created by taking a DC current and sending it through some specifically designed electronics. This AC current can then be carried over a magnetic field, but at a low efficiency. I'm trying to find a way to make it higher efficiency by making the magnetic field more of a closed system then a direct line.

But we could create a fairly strong magnetic field focused inside of a shape? I need it strong enough to carry a AC current efficiently. I mean by focusing the magnetic field, which I know is possible.

Hello, is it possible to create a magnetic web? By a web I mean like a magnetic field that's equal throughout a whole shape, and the shape is surrounded by something? Like for example, imagine having 5 pillars: - - - - - And inside all those pillars having a magnetic field that is only inside that field. Is this possible?

How about killing? Killing someone because they were about to do something extremely evil that would hurt millions, or killing someone for kicks. One is ethical, one isn't. But does that make both ethical?

I learned quite a bit from the computer, like good maneuvers to use knights, bishops, and rooks. Additionally, I learned a lot from losing against human players, such as the best pawn structures, effective ways to position your pieces, and tons and tons of traps and how to completely turn quite a few of them around.

I agree.

I learned with 750 games of chess. Almost all losing.

I can't spell for the life of me.

What religion? Some crackjob suddenly claiming their religion forbids it doesn't exactly means the religion forbids it, it means their called extremists. And as for the second link, it's a frickin catholic hospitable. Do you think they're going to do abortions? Granted, maybe it would have been smart for miscarriages, but wouldn't you just go to a normal hospitable instead of continually going to the same hospitable?

What religion has "Thou shalt not remove a dead fetus from a women's womb even if the fetus is dead and the woman will die no matter what unless you take it out."

Would this be a possible cause of dark energy or dark matter?

1. That's what we're discussing isn't it? I would, propose that you make adoption seem more appealing then an abortion, as well as decreasing the number of unwanted pregnancies with contraceptives. Obviously, that won't stop all, but hopefully it will help. 2. Didn't say you called me that and wasn't attempting to put words in your mouth, I was, however, expressing my views on how the pro-choice argument seems to view pro-life. If you remember just a few weeks ago inside the profile feed MonDie had a very interesting opinion towards pro-life that seemed to fall in line with "sick psycho monsters." 3. As you've already said, stopping people from getting abortions wouldn't work, and I'm willing to take your word for that. So, we just have to make it seem a lot less appealing, and make more appealing options readily available. 4. I don't recall asking for them, but okay. 5. You(plural) probably do agree more then you disagree. But I still say, your response was responding to what you believed to be the general pro-life argument rather then his actual post? 6. I'm honestly confused, but I'll just concede I probably ended up arguing back into myself or something.

1. If I'm not mistaken, he made his point very clear: "I would hope we can work together to at least make it a very rare thing." From that there, you can easily tell just by reading it he's not calling for a total ban, but rather to simply make it a very rare thing. Any questions on that? 2. Perhaps, might I say, that if a women and a man aren't in a good position to have a Baby, they should both take some extra precaution? I know. I'm a sick psycho monster trying to control and suppress women's sexuality, but honestly. Taking a few extra precautions in an attempt to not have a baby should be something you try to do if you don't want a baby. I would assume it's easier then getting an abortion, so why shouldn't you? I'm not asking why wouldn't you, I'm asking why SHOULDN'T you. As in, what reasons are there for NOT taking precaution? I'm sure you have some as you've claimed multiple times. 3. And yet, when someone asks to help make abortions rarer, you start accusing him of trying to control your sexuality. And honestly, reread your posts. This is CLEARLY what you did. This who paragraph contradicts your entire argument. So are you going to drop your argument or drop this paragraph as having meaning?

E = MC^2

I can.

Two(2).