Raider5678

Evidence? YOU NEED EVIDENCE????!??!?!?! Americans have created machines that cause earthquakes by shooting photons into the Ionosphere. They caused a tsunami on japan because they wouldn't trade. They faked the moon landings They tricked millions of Americans to vote for Donald Trump. This. Is. Reality.(Not really, except for the last one.)

Sums it up. If America was a person, whos like: You want republicans? Coming right up. One Senate. One Congress. On President. All 3 branches are republican controlled now, so there won't be much to stop any momentum.

Too late. We're all screwed.

I would disagree, but that's your opinion.

Actually, if it was simply a mix a chemicals as they say, then it should only be a matter of time before they recreate the conditions and you make life. Unless your wrong.

Perhaps if we made a missile, that could grab a nuke and drag it out into space.

Hmm, so like a counter that would make it so any launched nukes would do nothing?

I wonder, what would be required to make the world give up their oh so precious radioactive explosive toys?

So you say. That would still be an opinion. Please tell me when humanity discovered how the first cell was made. I and so many others are quite interested. Tell me, and my faith will be shattered.

I shall await the day. Within 5 years when I move out, I hope its done.

Didn't think it worked like that.

Let's see, assuming every man on Earth is an average of half his age. Half as many times per man, 750,000,000,000,000. (averaging about 41 billion ~ times a day, 476,190 times per second) times 4 billion for every man on earth.... That's a lot of kids..

Mostly agreed. Using it as a means of birth control IMO shouldn't be right or allowed, as there are other methods.

This isn't a linear equation. You can't even apply it to a graph.

Thanks.

I know, but you provided facts to the discussion which is always welcome.

That works. +1

Hey, I have a question about math. If you take : - 8 = 3/19 n (imagine the 3/19 as a fraction.) you need to find N. To do this you would flip the 3/19 to get 19/3 and put it of the other side of the equation. Getting: 19/3 * -8/1 = n Getting in the end the answer: -152/3 = n How does this give the answer?

That's a debatable question, but by the standards that they have decided that a fetus is not conscious because it doesn't have enough brain waves, a baby wouldn't be entirely conscious until quite a bit of time after its birth. Unless I'm entirely mistaken and misleading, in which case please correct me.

1. I would absolutely love to see your evidence for that. Abortion rates have gone up as we increased the availability, which shows an opposite correlation. If suddenly it were made illegal your saying nothing would happen? 2. Forgive me, I try not to be a hard headed stubborn pain in the ass like some other OP's, and sometimes change my mind. 3. You can't possibly be serious. Did you even read ANY of my posts your quoting? I made it very clear, I'm against killing a fetus, because the said fetus will become a baby if IF IF IFFFFFFFFFFFFF NOTHING happens. I brought up this point long before anybody else brought it to mind, I made it perfectly clear I understand that miscarriages happen. How is it you still do not understand that. 4. Refer to #2. 5. Your just finding reasons to criticize without having read the post. Please reread the post, fully and completely before quoting. And refer to #4. 6. Quite often their talked into it against their will or they were forced to do it, at least from the people I do know who've done it. So you tell me. Also, you understand I was pointing out how stupid that was in the first place? Your basically arguing that I said something you agree with. That's like saying: "I'm not arguing ethics here!" "You know your not arguing ethics here right?" Its stupid and entirely comical. 7. Oh come on, that's so completely ignorant that it isn't even non-sequitur its just random words typed out. There's modern day machines that can tell you, hey, the babies dead, we should remove it. Or, hey, this baby is completely malformed and is going to die. Or hey, this fetus has stopped growing. Or hey...... You get the point. And if you even read the entire post you would see I was referring to the point that SOMEONE ELSE made. So why don't you go arguing against them instead? 8. I spent 8 years in the system. Gee, let me think...... yes. Yes I do know something about foster care. And i'll tell you this, its better then being dead like so many others I know. 9. I'm not even going to answer this. refer to #7 10. You should listen to deltas advice and actually try to understand what we're arguing. Its clear from these few lines that you either never read a single post of mine, completely don't understand it, or never gave ANY thought what so ever into this. At all. 1. I have made it very clear that I understand what miscarriages are. So, just to make it clear to EVERYONE here, and who will ever post here again about this. I understand completely that fetuses will not all become a baby, and that sometimes there are miscarriages. I understand that we cannot always predict it, but when we can, then the fetus is then dead. I am NOT saying we can always predict it, I am NOT saying we always know, I am NOT saying all fetuses will become babies. Any posts touching on this subject will be referred to here from here on out. Please, I am not ignoring miscarriages, I'm telling you that when the fetus is going to become a baby, that it is unethical to abort it. If a miscarriage happens, that is besides the point. I am not arguing anything about miscarriages and I'm tired of repeating this. 2. You understand I already covered this. Multiple times. "Health risks to the mother". Remember that? 3. You seemed to have overlooked most of my responses. So, as a final note to everyone. I understand what miscarriages are, I understand that they happen. I am not claiming that the fetus will ALWAYS make it, sometimes I forget to include the fact that miscarriages happen. Stop finding those times where I forgot to mention that and pointing them out. I understand what miscarriages are. I understand how bad life can be, and I can tell you life over death is a true option. Claiming its better to kill someone because they will have a bad life means your now advocating for suicide as a legal thing. So I ask Everyone here: You say it's alright to kill a fetus because its not conscious. A baby isn't conscious, so whats the difference between it and a fetus? Why be allowed to kill a fetus because its unconscious, but not a baby? You can't advocate for one with out the other, so where do you draw the line? Either never, or not until the baby develops consciousness?

I thought Musk said it would be about the same price as a normal roof?

Hence meaning shes not pregnant.... To be considered pregnant you have to have a fetus growing.

Disturbing but not scary.

I'm confused, its if the egg becomes fertilized, not if it bounces around.......

Except, choosing not to conceive is simply choosing not to have a child. Choosing to gestate is choosing to kill the fetus.