blue89

hi, ( I think)I have created a new style in (popular) music.and I believe my voice is special and great. but as you see all these are subjective. to be objective these needs to be certified (by any music publishing association) but I am unsure whether it would be possible to do it under one rule below (this is one of my principles) -->> I can not sign (giving signature) to any contracts of course ,this is relevant to payment. these days I have too strict economic problems . but I am sure that I have highly creative personality. really I am unsure whether using the music will make me gain money,too. thats why already everyone prefer using internet to reach everytype of music. if I be successfull ,then I would take interest with my scientific studies. I am sure this is not required listening someone (other sceintists/professors) in order to learn new things (scientific). her/his written material will be enough. but here is too strict economic problems ,I should solve them at first. and I would try to do something by my own to gain money before applying somewhere (like funds,charities)

dear Strange ; I recommend that you check the thread('s content) one more time please. I actually do not need information that had already been explained related websites.however it would be good to give emphasis the reason of my aim via trying to take patent from U.S. that's why I actually do not wish to remain somewhere which it would be quite difficult to explain only opinions ,I would feel deeply free to show my creative aspect of personality effectively. according to my existing knowledge,i think this would be the best to prefer being at U.S.A ,otherwise I already think that the most effective and (akmost) unique parameter would be relevant ECONOMY to do/create something great in science.this means it will not be so effective in which university for learning/studying/WORKING at real. and I would notify you that this point had been released/sent to harvard/gsas at the content of my first project.and our communication is still being continued with harvard.(this university does not already care/depend the something ordinary,I am sure they are looking for something extraordinary! ..) all in all I do not wish to offer my studies to turkish patent institutes now. and exactly need someones who have had experience on this subject.note please ; if you experienced at least anytime ,I predict repeatedly that it would be worthwhile Sharing your knowledge with us. thanks for your care. regards.

hi dear scientists ; I would take patent(s) from this country's institute(s) if(/how) it is possible (/is). I request from the scientists whoes had (already) taken patent or who have been trying this to tell us steps ,requirements (not general requitrements implied ,general requirements have already been explained on their websites ) I can simply mean ; people who live the real events know more clearly everything related incident that he/she lived. therefore ,although the basic requirements have alredy been explained ,there would be probably existed else and different/(containinin some particular) information relevant to those researchers e-mails' contacting results.) please help (us) new scientists how to take PATENT. best regards

hi, I think there are some problems and these makes more difficult to find/explore something and also to use efficacies of them. for instance , we always may accept/(assume) studying at region which has no friction. but this is not so easy to create it. and in my opinion ; differences between the acceptance(assumption) and reality frequently cause troubles.I am sure this criterion will change the results too much effectively.

hi, I have written abstract of my interdisciplinary project and it had been sent. really although I do not know all the requirements to take patent for that journal, it is clear that this is scientific project and I already expressed in abstract that the intention of project would be taking better results than in process. I need & request these question's answer below ; -->> how many times the device (which is being used in treatment of cancer at radioteraphy part) , can be opened-closed/reopened ?? ( give please numeric answer as per second or per minute.-->> this question is highly important!!..) -->> how much does it take a total time in only one session ? ( specify it please ,if it is changing according to the type of cancer e.g.: pulmoner,melanom-skin,breast ,blood..etc) thanks.

sorry ,becaue of forum's features I can not edit after a determined time. OK. THE QUESTIONS -->> I think I have different skills in comparison other mathematician. when I am being alone I have ability studying hard & learn efectively ,but I do not know whether it would be worth , as you see the conditions is not so convenient. -->> not the fame really , OK there is no argument that this is good being famous. I think the source of being famous is explorng great ,or creating solution for difficult diseases & problems , OK I think it would be possible for me to solve. again I think it would requre studying hard and harder. then , I ask whether it would be worth ,for giving logical reason please compare marie curie's life ,she were studying so hard that she ruined her health , but on the other hand , we know that gaining money (being rich) is possible with other ways ,we know inna ,beyonce..etc. are richy .

--->> NOTE : this thread contain only asking guidance with giving supplement of defining personal skills. I have been studying for scientific projects for a a half of years. my the first project is almost ready. I am trying to take patent. I am mathematician.I think it would/may be probable/possible to solve such catastrophic diseases (such as :cancer,tetanus ,smallpox, ..etc) via supporting their treatments with cryptologic studies. but realy I am unsure whether it would be well worth or not ,here are my logical reasons to say this; *** currently I am MSc student at mathematics. but I have break for a while (quitted) and I do not want to continue. I am sure ,I can learn something by my own.I do not need someone to tell me for learning ,mainly it is being enough written materials.probably I am different because of this aspect *** I have had too much economic problems in whole of my life,and I do not know how I can solve it now. some of my friends say that I need to find fundings. I am from turkey ,I don't know this offer's content. is it true? may I take help at real? (I need these , silent and suited temperatured remaining place, and healthy feeds. I am not extravagant and I do not like doing harmful strange things (such as drinking bear,smoking. or spending times with spare/unintelligiable things.etc.) I am social. and hardworking. sometimes I am able to study constantly 8 times in a day without no having break. *** I saw these expressions by a plenty of academicians saying ; "you will not be able to be richy by making academic studies really I am hardworking , I asked to my own ,if I will not be able to be richy ,what will be the reason for studying hard??, then I responded: "I think we need to find/explore great things to be richy at academy." -->>this should be logic reason. I have created a new style in music (popular music) , I think whether it would be better to concern this study.I have already highly creative personality.but although everything I have principles: I love studying hard. I mean what will be the differences if we study hard but not academic. and here are a lot of economic problems still now. but again ,I believe/hope solving big problems if I be richy one day. I will be studying harder just at this time. because I would be efficacious tu humanity. I saw and hear many suffer from such bad diseases and I feel sad when they injured. my pretty words: I have very social personality : generally it is not important/regarding to converse or help someones her/his religious status ,gender , nationality and his / her economic status. what can I do ,or what should I do and how? ,I need ideas/guidance.thanks.I think it would be good publishing my new style of music at first time.I think my voice is good. regards.

O.K. I accept this expresion that you have not had any problem with that theorem. I think I am expert of basic analysis. and just because of this,fundamental theorem is basic, I relied on again. O.K. ajb see you then.

I think I have already explained relevant to statement given in bigger size. but please do not think that you are giving me unrest , I really do not feel matter anytime because of scientific conversations especially sometimes in mathematics there exist some details whiches seem unimportant ,but they are not unimportant.(if you have any doubts whethr fundamental theorem is correct or not, then I recommend that you check the related subjects repeatedly how required to best undertand) I also allege that in my opinion the details are the most important things in mathematics,I think we closely can/should use it as a modelling.or we should use its efficacy via studying cryptologic.but of course it will require to study hard and getting hard to take the best from our systematized results

don't be confused please , it is not so difficult to understand fundamental theorem. (I looked one of your paper and I thought this was more difficult than fundamental , really ,I do not believe that something is difficult already,I only would express that it will not be so worth spending our long times ,but it is generally required.)then , make it simple please , I remember omething for the second part of fundamental ,and I remember my hodja given this is relevant to continuoum too. care please that if any function is continuous on closed interval , then it will be regularly continuous. look please this document at wikipedia is more comprehensive to understand : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus . may contain some faults in my opinion. or it is telling in different way. but again really I request you to inform me ; "are you asking something about a question that every details of its have not been understood (yet) ? " or "would you like to speak something scientific only, relevant pure mathematics (having no question but being willing to speak scientific conversation) ?"

didn't you ask this question below(??) for this question.riemann integral is strong definition. but may not be enough to understand everything about integral properly .. here is something about fundamental theorem and just as I predicted it mentions about being regular continuous. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FundamentalTheoremsofCalculus.html

!!: read please the guidance below ,riemann integral might/does not provide us understanding fundamental theorem.there are some another strong criteria available!. the message i sent you contain something about Lebesgue integral with relevancy of functional analysis.I recommend that you check surroundingly to all related statements [definitions ,theorems] for your question above.(there might be some other (additional) requirements e.g. : continuoum or regaular continuoum ( as you know continuoum and regular continuoum are not same! ,define separate things..(look please exxtra : lipschitz (Criterion) and cantor theorem [!!: cantor theorem says ; if any function is continuous on the closed interval then, this function will be regularly continuous on that interval!..).. in addition ,i have sent to you some information in private. o.k. really because of I am not interested a lot to pure mathematics ,I am not willing to research anymore in traditional way (I am also different than others as I implied Before times). because I am sure and I see ,there are already lots of theorem ,but if we ask that what is the reason for creating all these?? in my opinion the LOGICAL answer is not visible!... (otherwise ,of course it does not mean that I am not able to study so, look please the sentence written in bold,it shows the reason why I do not want to study as traditional) please do not hesitate asking me any question else if you have.(especially related analysis ,functional analysis, and basic algebra )

oh dear , apology ,I had understood incoorrectly , I have supposed that he implied studying partial and to continue so in progress&later would be better. probably one associate.proffessor at mimar sinan university caused thinking so. it seems this is not relevant to this thrad my idea I shared above. but again I will write it. *** * *** I think studying interdisciplinary would be very effective and may be useful. of course it would require studying much more than particular. but I am sure we would be able to produce useful and so we would be able to be efficacious to humanity. I think the last expression is already should be science's goal. and it is clear that scientists who created usefuld products (theorie,patent) are richy or beloved. *** * *** I would study like tesla, gauss,thomas edison now. then, really I am more interested in mathematical modelling and this just throughout to find useful cryptology. but I would express this : it is clear that now some theories relevant to integral (and also other subjects,too) already do not contain universal information. for instance calculating riemann integral is approximation ,it is not certitude. but of course according to mathematical principles ,there is no contradiction. because this is the result of limit.

I quite againts this idea and also I am sure that this expression should be incorrect. look please golden rate may told something in general ,then I think it is highly clear that at the top of science almost every subjects will be related each with them.

I cancelled that message. a new e mail reached from harvard gsas and it seems positive but I have quite bad conditions in turkey.and I apologise if I gave unrest to anyone.I will try to solve my troubles by my own. regards

in relevancy of your mathematical allegement ,I implied that this was principle at mathematics ,using determined methods to prove something. for instance proving by creating contradiction , proving by log.induction , ..etc. but I am quite sure that giving example is not proof. it is true that mathematics is entertaining science ,but it requires to study hard. (I think) if someone is willing to learn and believe that he/she has creative and intelligent personality ,I highly recommend that going on studying mathematics. !!: (note: contradiction with your allegement exists : let give value a=4 ,b=8 ,this formula does not trust giving these values ,and also your calculations seems like including errorrs (incorectness)) you can send them to me in private. I can assess if I will have enough time then) !!:these can not show that you would be unsuccessfull at mathematics in the future!!.. additional imnformation : I advise that you check K-12 community in american education system.

@fatih I aprreciate your interest ,but I am smiling :-) because you have not proved the allegement you have given. this is principle at math departments and also this principle is certified/valid in other disciplines of science. I will simply express that ; "it is not proof giving example." :-)

hi, now I continue on functional analysis. but of course it is related to topology. I do not think that this department is as difficult as it is being spoken. I am trying to modelize something to have modernized shape. @geordief your explanations includes very much key words to do or express something. but actually I do not want to give any information before my studies (project&articles) be published. because I do not think that there were so comprehensive or different studies available. and of course, (with high probability in meaning) we are not allowed to give anyone information without sceinetific corrects,or it must be so. I hope to explore something great. have a succesfull life.

ok. thats very good.and thanks for your suggesttions.I need to serach convenient journals now. thanks.

uuu ajb wellcome , although generally you are writing in official type/style ,your comments are sweet/friendly (thanks).it is very nice to see you again. and in this case I would ask you ; -->> how can we be able to discriminate which of them require payment? (did you see , the nature's requirement is very expensive (is'nt it)?) -->> did you imply that statement above for sci/ssci indexed journals? thanks.

ha haha haha haha :-) :-) I have not read the text given yet. but I would explain my idea only according to thread "I absolutley do ot believe " haha haha haha now , I concentrate on my research but... if anyone asks , I think I will try with my too much funny personality :-) meanwhile this thread will have been the cutest /the most pretty I have ever seen and/or I will have ever seen :-) and of course ,I am sure ,I will be communicating entertaining funnily writing to this thread this subject is very very pretty/entertaining.

wellcome dear Arete , we have talked a bit about you with studiot , he tried to help me and he mentioned something shortly relevant to your research area . that was not much information , but I remember he expressed you have information about radioactive lightening in use of medicine. if you give permission , I will try to continue my questions whiches are relevant to radioactive waves in private (but the questions will be interdisciplinary of physics-biology). unfortunately, I have no experience in publishing our literatures. here are some important questions. and I hope you to be able to help me; *** do all journals (whiches are sci indexed only) require me to pay for publishing?? (note please: I have contacted with nature journal , but the editor showed me the list and all journal of them required expensive cost. <<--- of course this might be my own (subjective)opnion whether it is expensive ,I saw all journals required at least around 3500$ (these are nature's journals),however , it is being said that there exist sci indexed journals whiches do not require cost for publishing) (one detail in their last e-mail (nature's editor) it was eplained there was an open access journal (this was NPG,I do not know what "open access means,forgive please I am new, does it mean exemption of cost for publishing and reading articles in their archive? *** could you give me some more details please relevant to the expression given in bold and bigger size (in your quoted comment) (??) -->> (and) is it in intelligible ? if I undestand truly ,you mentioned that it would be enough me to give only title to convenient journal. (do you know definite/actual information? (and the detailed requirements how to do this (in assumption of being this information is completely true (look please the condition above (wrtitten in same size)) (for instance my paper was around 22 page (it is rudiment's width) ,[1] will they require me to send them all of it, or [2] will it be enough to send them only the title (I think ,if it is so, it is interesting although it is easy and useful and although it will make me happy ) ,the second opinion does not seem intelligible, but I am new ,I do not know the truth)

dear Strange ; not being impolite it has been probable that you had seen some faults in my previous post (which had been erased).but I actually do not agree you, I suggest you to be more positive (like this ; thinking the existence of good people , not thinking bad people (especially whoes casuse problems) ,thinking winning exams , not failing exams. . etc.) I think I might be a bit careless , but if you meant all content of my conversation was empty of meaning, (I am sure ,this allegement should be impossible!) I wonder now where my friend is (@studiot) I really yearned him. yes this was the last e-mail, taken from harvard gsas ,but the allegement you given can/should not be possible .(I have some more information relevant to our conversation with harvard) ,in my reply to this e-mail,I shortly requested them to make an assessment and send me. of course ,I expressed in it I had hoped to implement this project at harvard,too. I would wait their responding.then , probably I will rewrite my questions relevant just this thread ( that I had erased them) , after TOEFL examination. (I said I will reform ,but...)