blue89

as I said I apologise ,I will reform it.

*** * *** ithis long message was containing some faults to understand clearly(e.g:faults by spelling & some grammar faults) I apologise for this and I will try to reform it as soon as possible. thanks *** * *** blue.

yes sure!.. I congratulate you. I have forgotten to say but actually this ones you had given by making additional expression ,is completely great!.. yes, we can also not be sure just from what we believe ,too. like this : you are able to say I am muslim ,but maybe you are not. you are able to say I am christian ,but maybe you are not. ..etc. for instance in our belief [islam] ve accept that if someone refuse only one of rule in our valuable religiouus book, we will be able to say that he/she is not muslim anymore then. but this point generally does not known and probably lots of people change their religion in a day :-) (there is so another more points available too,and some of are very sensitive) because all of this, I think especially to love or give regards somebody ,it should not be important what he/she believes ,what her /his gender is and what his/her nationality is.of course just because of this ,I am proud of using this sentence: :-) I love everyone

dear @serious disabled ,I have created so articles (just like in these subjects) . but regrettebly I can not share them now ,as I said such studies like in these subjects are articles ,it means they are completed. because of sharing there ,I would them to be published in some SSCI or SCI indexed (intellectual) journals. [look please to this link I have some strange matters to make them publish link :http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/94899-interdisciplinary-research-i-need-ssci-indexed-articles/ ] now I think I can only say that (in my opinion) we are not able to explain such subjects with only studying at one science department. to see clearly or to be able making obvious explanation we require to look/study pther parts of science. and especially ethics is not isolated such subjects [it is related]. for example you say this , think that someones shout or be nervous to you with no reason ..then think please one of this ones is your mother/father .. what/how you will feel ? I think we can define special function between your feelings and this question's subject. think please ,your feelings go to infinite regress [regress: because you are being nervous or sad [negative]although you are right, if you were happy ,we would say/define progress [positive]] I say we are able to say these two different statements are quitely similar. or these are not isolated ,related. as a result ,at first, our beginning subjct generally was been assessed in physics ...1 the second one was generally being assessed in ethics (your feelings ,behaviours ..etc.) ..2 if you are persuaded at least for a bit ,it shows us that 1 and 2 are correlated.

hi ; I can not see your education status & interests when I look profile. My interest area is functional analysis. I try to make some observations (it means I would create&implement projects based on applied functional analysis)..but before, it might require more research. related subjects will be : metric , normic ,inner product spaces and others. we also might need more financial butget to implement that projects I thought.

hello dear scientists ; I think I study hard although my life is in trouble. I decided to reply your questions to me ,too. furthermore I did not meet these scientists (Arete ,Claron Y) ,but these are recommended to me,to take assistance. it was said that these scientists are expert of radioavtive lightening. sincerely blue

....

hi ; (if you do not understand every part of this text or think that it is not understandable,I request you to report me with using private message) I think we should give respect to everybody.everybody deserves it. I am muslim. but intimately love/give regards to atheists. I have not thought that I am more valuable than them, or any others. it is true , it should be true. I am equal with them and of course love them. although every muslim does not know ,I think this is confidently correct. think please ; how do you feel when someone hurts you?? [everyone has equal emotion system , (I do not mean I agree them , I only would give emphasis we have to give respect and give freedom to every people to explain their ideas,or else it will be impossible to help each other,in assumption one of them is true,too] atheists are humans like us (and also,in my opinion some of them are intelligent !..: most of them love to research why they should believe.) think this point please ;if we believe firmament religion ( we are not able to learn actual ideas that our god thinks!..) if you trust my last sentence , I would ask you this question.. how will we be able to learn that we are more estimable than others in GOD's mind!?? (it is impossible!) and because of this ,I think that we can not compare somebody with another ones [instead of GOD]. and it is not also important whom they are,what their genders, or nationality. [-->>theese are not important to love someones] I do not express that there is no difference between humans , I do not mean everyone have the same competence everytime or we will, but I am sure ,they have the same competence still they are able to take breathe. everyone deserves respect still he/she lives.[--->> this contains (already) the main reason] we should love everyone,I love regards

sorry,I did not understand.(what that meant written in bold)

yes the two last comments are right. but it is no problem in this subject because; as I said the project is inetrdisciplinary. (at least these three disciplines will be required to complete: math (ready)-physics-medicine) !! : note: the rudiment of project had been sent only,is around 20-22 page) this will not depend on only mathematics,as I implied it is trial project to have new form for treatment mortal disease of cancer. and just because of this ; I can not put in order every part of project (treatment) without taken acceptance.be confident I understood you. again , I think it will be possible to make model from example part (for your questions) in the content of my comment given at 11.03 A.M time, (at previous page) otherwise ,you are confidently al right asking these questions dear @Klaynos and @swansont. the project is interdisciplinary and can not be completed only by mathematician ().

DEAR SCIENTISTS; I have shared some special parts of the project with dear studiot. I have not met with him ,yet. but I depend him because of his e-mails he had sent to me. I thought he is wise and I will be waiting his interpretation & assessment . probably he may have enough information in functional analysis ,I would remind that this part of mathematics is not easy . it contains also topology includind some part of its.(not exactly project's own,it means functional analysis) I know you have not understood everything clearly ,and I would notify its reason is ,giving inadequate information about project. I have only written my questions (in the content of this thread) that I do not have enough information about them ,and of course these questions are related with physics. summary I have sent , some other parts of my interdisciplinary project that had been sent to harvard. and I will be waiting dear studiot's ideas.(I wonder) kind regards blue

hi; if you take care sensitively , you will see this equation of circle is changeable. our radius is not static ,it changes depend on time at real. look please to my post which has been given 11.03 A.M today. you will be able to see convenient explanation for this statement in example.

if you think you are intelligent I propose you shortly , do not worry , continue to study hard... I wish/hope you to be succesfull..(do not forget ,somethings are relevant to luck ) regards blue.

sure!.. but probbaly ,I need to share some special parts of the project more, to be accurately clarified thanks studiot. thanks to others ,too. regards blue.

oh , I did not understand your this conversation with mike ,but I think studiot is friendly , studiot could you look your inbox ,I have sent to you something (request).

probably you are all right. I am going to post my some comments one by one to yours, relevant to above(some of them will be important) at first I would thank to you for the first one, as I said,I did not make asessment my language skill by any examination. but I have high confidence that I am able to learn almost everthing by my own, there is needed only one necessity, and it is written material relevant to the information that would be learnt . (there is possible availability of mistake in this long sentence ) thanks again for the last one. I would try it.

I see , writing incorectly is possible for everybody. although (I suppose )you are native english

actually this hurts me if you are quite series. I will enroll to to TOEFL (by ETS) examination , now I can not say anything clearly about language.(because it will be the first time to be atended this exam) but , I gsuggest you according to my initial interpretation , I already try reforming them that I realise quickly. look and check please I had already reformed this incorrectness before you wrote this post. you can check it by looking posting time my post sent (editing time): 12.54 your post sent : 12.58 this shows you that I had already realised and reformed this mistake.

help me please ; (I would clarify you if your questions are decipherable) what kind difficulty did you mean ?? (such a grammar mistake , lack of terminology or equation) but all questions can be answered if they are decipherable as I said.

I apologise; but this question can not be answered to protect the project!.. now ,there we discuss only partial of the project. and at the same time ; I propose you looking this literature for another questions about functional analysis (if you have) : KREYSZIG : erwin kreyszig.

I confidently think mathematics is not as respective as some parts os sciences now,especially in comparison medicine and software computer engineering. but wait please , I have some projects , I think I am clever and in my opiniom if this project is implemented succesfully and ather ones like this, I think it will be possible the mathematics to be the most important and respective part of science. let ,look at my thread I have sent my project to harvard university (gsas) http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/94898-waves/#entry919359 and I am functional analysist.

oh ,forgive I have forgotten that here is physics forum.(this was easy I thougt but..forgive if it is not comprehensive) ok. this equation is existing above , is expressing waves in cartesian equation.(!!: not important, they can be shown both in polar coordinates and spherical coordinates ,too) !! : but as I said , we should be confident to see their clear shape to write this. look at image of dear Mike's shared please, my approximate written equation above is the second one ,to be able to understand clearly. and for the first one ,you will assume that our waves are shaped on X-Y cartesian plane ,and they can be shown sequently because of our parameter "r", r defines radius to origin. example : x2 +y2=r2 our T1 wave's radius r1=2 T1 will be shown x2+ y2 = 4 r2= 3 T2= x2+y2=9 ... ... ... rn= n Tn = x2+y2= n2 .. r=radius' show the distances between each waves and origin (source)

DEAR SCIENTISTS ; before beginning I would be pleased you check messages repeatedly , all of scientist have understood correctly ,but my first comment replying to dear swansont ,was incorrect because of one exxtra word. ok. it is one of the most important Question written in bold (Above at dear : studiot's comment) about this project . well , as I said ,I am not physicist , I am mathematician , ... the first queation above I have been asked was to make clarity just about this. I will say that this is importan for any mathematician , but you will understand easily I think. " if we are able to show/picture the waves (especially the elektromagnetic/nuclear ...etc whiches are can not been observed by our eyes like waves on water) we would be able to write them with their function ,for example if we mark T1 (and picture/show) the first one of our wave (!!: but we should have ability to do this , this required & compulsory) this would make us a new clue I think ...yes it should be true. for example, if our T1 numbered wave's function is can be written with this equation X2 +Y2 = 16 this would prove us (at firs time we would be confident (already) if we are able to write with this functional equation!! this is more clear!,(furthermore this shows us that mathematics is respective ,it makes us being confident for certitude, if we are not able to show them with their function , how will we picture them or how will we be able to observe (see with device) them !?? , being able to write them with their mathematical function is important !!) and in this way , this would bring us new clues to use mathematical principles/theories , not clue, exactly this will ensure us to use it properly. how will we use it, or what kind information will this bring us ? REMEMBER PLEASE AT FIRST I HAVE WRITTEN THAT , THE DEPARTMENT OF MATH-ANALYSIS MAINLY REEARCHES THE **** sequences and their properties (especially such as being convergent or divergent) **** functions properties ****series **** and their limits above given above, and other properties as a summary. Let ,see it will be very very easy to express the waves by this , we will express with mathematical equationeasily. let rewrite teh equation --->> x2+y2 = r2 ----> because of the parameter of "r" , we have the SEQUENCE (OR SERIES) of waves now!! and continue, what will be done ?? it is well known that there are available many many theories/principles in mathematics!!.. just in this project ,I would try to use one of them!.. (dear scientists: I see there exist engineers ,physchists and other scientists. intimately I would be pleased if you express your opinions about about my project) ****** ****** blue. it will be very important whether we are able to show/picture them as functional. for instance the picture given is similar to be expressed with this function (approximately) y=sin(x) an also there are functional sequences in analysis especially in functional analysis we are able to express with functional sequence like this Fn(x) = n.sin(x) .