blue89

could you provide me please an evidence? !!

I am functional analysist and I think I am expert of basic analysis (I am mathematician BSc : Mathematics (istanbul university 2013) MSc sdu-mathematics , 2014 ) Basic Limit Form for sequences if n → ∞ An → a , then this will basically mean that for any ε >0 and n ∈ N , for any Nε > n , │An - a │ < ε This means ,the limit is a one point that almost all of other points are in neighborhood of the limit point Some very shortTopological approach or contexts. The limit point is important point why this point is being assessed at topology widely (especially in general and beginning descriptions ) for instance when our An 's elemnts be elemnt of A¯ and An → a ,then this will be enough for us to say that the A set will be complete or will provide to reach such contexts. however if An's elements were alement of A° we would not be able to say the same thing. the compactness is also one of very important and we are able to ensure the compactness definition with almost the same similarity via using some sequences' properties (cauchy sequences - check also please bolzano - weierstrass theory - and "compactness" according to sequence approach)

May I ask what that means ,"surjective" ??

if it has been asked this one lim Xn = infinity lim Yn = - infinity lim (Xn + Yn) = 0 ?? yes ,this is right!

hi , I am not engineer. I am mathematician and my studies are closely related with mathematical engineering. I could not understand well your question well why (presumably) because of I have not enough knowledge relevant engineering. but ; AS EXTERNAL INSTRUCTION I would remind that we cannot write this equation everytime: A+B = C for instance if A is element of R3 and B is element of R4 ,then we will not be able to write this equation .. but with extreme probability ajb's knowledge is higher than mine on this subject,I know this cannot be written everytime. if he has enough time ,maybe he help you about your question. blue

hi Dear Arete Welcome, many thanks ,actually nature sptringers APC services sent me a mail around few minutes ago. I should update something in this thread but I need to leave now mm ,I think Studiot very nice member according to our private conversation. and he was recommended me to contact you .. ok,very nice to see you there and many thanks ,I need to leave highly well organised answers your comment but I might ask and will add an update.(you or someones might be negatively surprised)

ok ,actually I do not love speculative discussisons about my works ,I am intimately series.firstly I will share my raper's title directly and will share that senior editors original comment. title The New Form Of treatment for Cancer Ilness Under Convenience Of Functional Analaysis' Contexts To Research Newest Clues about >3D space dear Phi for all ,the thing that you have told is very simple,I apologise but I do not think that your both two comments be corect. wait I am opening my e-mail. I apologise Strange , you are right if you do not believe me ,but intinmately I am speaking truly. unfortunately , since I have registered to nature's "translational psychiatry" journal, my outlook account frequently has been collapsed!.. it cannot be opened now I cannot reach my e-mail

welcome strange ,how is everthing going ? I hope you feel good. ok. but isn't this detail a bit strange? -->> I had sent this abstract to ecanvermedicalscience( the abstract which sent to nature-methods is only a bit reformed type of this ) , their senior editor reported me very kindly/politely that they had had no required protocols for proposal projects. but she suggested me to contact such journals which have enough protocols note : she was thanking me in her all e-mails ,I Ioved this. ok). but the strange thing is the incoordination between these two events. I had seen someones were publishing at ecancermedicalscience and their interests (graduate department or institution) were quite irrelevant/far from cancer ilness. and now I am sure nature's this journal is not such weak journal (note also IF>32 !) that we be able to think their scope is not enough. this seems a bit illogical. and because of this ,really I have been surprised!

Hi I would apply for a conference to present my project (but I will be presenter). and request from someones who have experiences for presentation of conference. 1) may I apply by Journals ? (I saw nature and Science AAAS have conferences ,but I did not survey information yet.) 2) if so, What options do journals provide? (for instance ,do journals provide us waiving costs such as tickets of journey , accomodation, visa expenses and process . 3) will that association who I would give conference by its suopport ,want me to provide a determined TOEFL score? if so ,how amount of score is being asked generally? or what other options about this? 4) this will be presentation of scientific project , assume plase all qustions above are in the affirmative,and we had presented our conferences , would we have any sanctions as a presenter of conferences after assessment if assessment will exist? 5) what will happen after presentation be ended ? (what probbailities ,chances or risks will exist?) 6) mighjt only one presenter present his/her subject at any conference? (not via collaboration implied)

excuse me ,I could not understand well ,have you implied that "we do no doubt..." used as this one "we could not be persuaded.." ??

Hi ; I have (pre)submitted my project's abstract (only abstract) to NPG- Nature Methods journal and it has been replied (assessed). I will write the report there without giving title and My name- surname. but actually I could not be sure that which one was the actual reason for being inappropriate (probable reasons that I think will be given at last ) I see two reasons but cannot be sure which one was the actual reason , it seems like their reply contains a contradiction. because I already think that my project should be especially very very suitable for lboratory studies.. but when we look the decision text ,it seems like a contradiction. this journal's IF>32, so I do not think that this journal be such a easy journal or be concentrated on easy (basic) subjects I am writing the reply at first there (copy paste): Dear ... Thank you for your inquiry about submitting your paper entitled " ...." to Nature Methods. After examining the work I'm sorry to say that submission to Nature Methods would not be appropriate. We do not doubt the technical quality of your work or that it may prove of interest to others working in cancer therapy. However, we think that your work is not suitable for Nature Methods which is devoted to laboratory methods used to investigate basic biological research questions. Nevertheless, thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. I am sorry that on this occasion we cannot be more positive. Sincerely, Natalie de Souza, Ph.D. Chief Editor Nature Methods probable reasons that I thought 1) this abstract was out of the journal's scope (but laboratory word reminiscents me a contradiction so, I sent this editor a defense including some hard formulas) 2) This abstract was not good organised ,or was illogical in use .. etc. ( really she expressed that there were no doubt about technical quality this expression seems like another contradiction if we say that this was illogical or bad .. or ...(!)) what can be the actual reason for being inappropriate?? what should I do ?? !!: UPDATE THAT EDITOR HAS REPLIED AGAIN (really very short reply ,I had written too long defense in comparison) it says ; Dear .. Thank you for this and your other letters. I suggest you submit the paper elsewhere, I don' t think it's right for Nature Methods. Sincerely, Natalie de Souza this last reply was around 2-3 minutes ago (hot) note: I am not doing grammatical errorrs at real. only problem my keyboard is spoilt this commonly causes spelling faults and spelling faults may cause grammatical faults appearance,I apologise for this. and will try to care it how possible is. there has not been detected in this text such gramatical errors.

I would leave from there until any part of my wide scientific project be submitted to any good association.. I would remind or would express my own opinion (if it is personal opinion ,..,but we know that some great scientists already showed this ) that at the top of science almost every subject will be in relation between each them... about english skill : ets TOEFL reported me that I have had very good understanding grammatical structure... care only the content of my posts please ,I already may detect the faults which are linguistic I think I have genuine ,but I also confess that I have careless personality in such subjects.. and I definitely don't like making someone repeat or to repeat something ... (!) but of course ,until the evidence of knowledge be certified, you are right for your this critique..

do not miss the time there ... you may make your such questions be solved only with some programmes like WOLFRAM ... this programme will solve highly quickly and ...this will be the best way ..be sure. NOTE: I don't mean I cannot solve such problems or this for any other ones. but I would say that this will not be logical. (if you were asking something theoritic ,it would not be so) you may see so interestingly difficult or more difficult quations in Nature's or SCIENCE's articles ,but I do not think that those scientists who prepared that articles had calculated all that integral fomrs by their hand .. wolfram is expertise to calculate such problema (I do not know using this well ,but I saw this at once when I was at BSc in one course) wolfram is good.

hey thanks for this cute reply EXTERNAL EXPLANATION actually I do not want to be impatient ,but unfortunately IEEE does not work well. I am sure ,whenever I sent any e-mail to Nature ,their editors were responding me only in 24 hours , and their every email was very wide just like in which type I hoped .. IEEE replied an e-mail around 2 hours ago ,but I feel me like a tortoise ...and there are 4 e-mail has not been responded. bored , bothered , a bit stressed , got angered..,

bimbooo Welcome yes I had used Gnuplot ,unfortunately it does not provide qualified graphs .. I need some effective graphs like in Nature's or SCIENCE AAAS journal's articles

probably Dr Krettin has some missing details and I could not understand what Strange has been telling in his last comment. look what I believed and thought then and about missing details and just directly relevant this thread 1) I understood (just agrred with strong confidence) that great scientists has reached almost everything by just their self ability (of course with combining hardworking personality + GENUINE) (*** * ***) 2) This is missing detail : Dr Krettin says that this would be compulsory to continue at any university as postgrad education to rach some great accomplishments ,but I am confident that is not required! ...check please especially in this modern century there exist too many scientists ( many many professors ,but could you show me please : where is the great one , where is someone like newton ,where is someone like archimedes or like nikola tesla ...or ..etc. there are too many examples may be given. and note please I could not find that tesla had a PhD degree 3) if you are againts these details ,I recommend that yo check educational institutes what is modern education's goals (????) 4) PATENT I do not want to be relevant with this for a while ,this is not my problem ..the problem does not belong me and I am series that I do not tell something like novel. check please what had avicenna said when he reached his first and great achievement ,remember please when the king had asked what he wanted from king to do for avicenna ; he replied ; "I WOULD YOU TO LET ME USE THE LIBRARY HOW I WOULD USE" *** * *** look please the noble ,and the respect please avicenna didn't want something like money or didn't want something like someone to tell him something to learn... but when I allege that I have had ability to learn by myself , I also saw someone teasing with me . .. hah ..this is reality ... what was the patent .. never mind for a while ,I know the reality .. never mind the personal ideas ,care the UNIVERSAL TRUTHS ...

Strange I think you are missing something. .. your the best sentence was this one ..(I do not remember actual type but was like this) "most of well known good scientists were self taught" because this one is the thing that I am unable to make someone undertand this detail ..but I believe and know that this is reality.. ok. my studies will be spread on. ad I am not telling novel.

Dear Klaynos ,it did not run , ok no problem .. your intimate was the more clear importance. thanks , yes google search ,but already there exist a tutorial guidelines in their official website : http://www.tutorialspoint.com/r/r_line_graphs.htm but I could not find how to draw 3D graphs. thanks again.

:-) :wub: :-) :wub: succintly; CharonY is quite right! ..

because I would explore something great!.. but as you see ,my researches require observations & experiments .. maybe ,it would be good to apply universities for this, because it seems as area to do this is more suitable to choose laboratories instead patent institutes.

hıımm did you imply writing "3dplot" instead "plot" in command line? I will do this now. furthermore my antivirus programme is preventing almost all programmes to install. GNU-octave has been prevented although I uploaded it.

haha ,strange thanks very much .. I will check the links you given one by one, but do you know the R-programming ,it is not difficult to learn and draw. strange yes just as you said ,I am unable to pay now. really someone understamds incorrectly when I am writing such expression if I were any option ,I would be proud of paying its fee and at all such subjects (I am generous) why I believe science is the most prominent thing in my mind. granpa ,no I haven't used that programme anytime. and..do you know whether we are unable at reality to draw graphs with R-programming??