redkiss

THANK YOU VERY MUCH ( each opinion more is important ) PLEASE not show me reply I want to study ALONE - all my drawings I prepared alone ( I think that I not misunderstand words that I translated - my drawing showing RED) better example is here ( I showed speed respect to center - I not measured this problem it is only example to study problem ) on my eyes I see 1/3 Hz shift we no need speak about Big Planet universe is very very big 600 000 km it is not big distance Expantion ? it is possible that we see red because we have Rotation ? - we no need linear motion ( escape ) to see Red ( thank You for help again ... please study my post it is natural when one person see something new it is new and he is able make small mistake but ... it could be small mistake ... ) ??? I will be in shock if I misunderstand wiki and I found something very important for physics ??? sometimes stupid IDEA = NEW ???

YOU SEE MY MISTAKE ? ( OK PLEASE WAIT i WILL STUDY ABOVE BOOKS list .............. ) ...... WAIT PLEASE IT IS MANY JOB ( FEW WEKS OR dayS ?? ) THANK YOU FOR PATIENCE mistake ? 1 ,2 , 3, - source POSITION source = 3 hz 1',2',3' - sensor position

I WILL FIND THIS PARAGRAPH ( wait .... I looking ....) Przypisy David Halliday, Robert Resnick: Fizyka. T. II. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1972, s. 427 - 430. Doppler, C.A.: Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einige andere Gestirne des Himmels. 1842. Tekst w niemieckich Wiki-źródłach (niem.). de.wikisource.org. [dostęp 2010-05-20]. Fale dźwiękowe. W: Robert Resnick, David Halliday: Fizyka. T. 1. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA, 1998, s. 511 - 517. ISBN 83-01-09323-4. Erik Gregersen: The Britannica Guide to Sound and Light. The Rosen Publishing Group, 2011, s. 293 - 295. ISBN 1615303006. Nobelprize.org: Johannes Stark – Facts (ang.). Nobel Media AB 2013. [dostęp 2013-09-28]. Propagacja fal w próżni. [dostęp 2014-05-29]. William Cronk Elmore, William C. Imore, Mark A. Heald: Physics of Waves. Dover Publications, 1985, s. 164 - 166. ISBN 0-486-64926-1. Andrzej Kajetan Wróblewski, Janusz Andrzej Zakrzewski: Wstęp do fizyki. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1984, s. 104 - 105. ISBN 83-01-01359-1. Yuri Ivanov: Rhythmodynamics:RD interpretation of the results of Michelson’s experiment. Gabriel LaFreniere: Matter Is Made of Waves:Electron. Gabriel LaFreniere: Matter Is Made of Waves:Ivanov Waves. Andrzej Kajetan Wróblewski, Janusz Andrzej Zakrzewski: Wstęp do fizyki. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1984, s. 232 - 239. ISBN 83-01-01359-1. Piotr Cieśliński: Kosmiczne błędy. [dostęp 2014-06-09]. Peter R. Hoskins, Kevin Martin, Abigail Thrush: Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. Cambridge University Press, 2010, s. 85 - 87. ISBN 9781139488907. Rozporządzenie Ministra Gospodarki z dnia 9 listopada 2007 r. w sprawie wymagań, którym powinny odpowiadać przyrządy do pomiaru prędkości pojazdów w ruchu drogowym, oraz szczegółowego zakresu badań i sprawdzeń wykonywanych podczas prawnej kontroli metrologicznej tych przyrządów pomiarowych (Dz. U. z 2007 r. Nr 225, poz. 1663) Opis wibrometru William H. Guier, George C. Weiffenbach. Genesis of Satellite Navigation. „Johns Hopkins Apl Technical Digest”. 19 (1/1998) (ang.). Piotr Kaniewski. System nawigacji satelitarnej GPS, cz. 1. „Elektronika Praktyczna”. Cezary Ziółkowski, Józef Rafa: Przestrzenno-częstotliwościowe uwarunkowania lokalizacji źródeł fal radiowych wykorzystującej efekt Dopplera. Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Wydział Elektroniki, Instytut Telekomunikacji, 2007. [dostęp 2014-05-29]. Michael Smotherman, Walter Metzner. Effects of Echo Intensity on Doppler-Shift Compensation Behavior in Horseshoe Bats. „Journal of Neurophysiology”. 89, s. 814-821, 1 lutego 2003. American Physiological Society. DOI: 0.1152/jn.00246.2002. Nowy radar w Polsce. [dostęp 2014-05-31]. Sergiusz Chmielak: Inne mniej inwazyjne metody pomiaru rzutu minutowego serca. [dostęp 2014-05-29]. Rodzaje prezentacji w badaniach USG. [dostęp 2014-05-29]. Echokardiografia. [dostęp 2014-05-29]. Andrzej Paluszkiewicz: Przewlekłe niedokrwienie kończyn. [dostęp 2014-05-31]. Andrzej Sołtan: Rozszerzanie się Wszechświata. [dostęp 2014-06-01]. Katarzyna Mikulska: Zderzenie galaktyki Andromedy z Drogą Mleczną. luty 2014. [dostęp 2014-06-01]. D.J. Erskine, J. Edelstein: Externally Dispersed Interferometry for Planetary Studies (ang.). SPIE Optics & Photonics, San Diego, CA, United States, 12.08.2005. [dostęp 2014-04-20]. G.A.J. Hussain: Inferring coronal structure from X-ray lightcurves and Doppler shifts - a Chandra study of AB Doradus. NASA, 2005. [dostęp 2014-06-10]. ESA: Engineering – Probe Data Relay Subsystem (ang.). [dostęp 2010–07–02]. Materiały pomocnicze do Ćwiczenia VIII. [dostęp 2010-05-22]. Barbara Baran: Badanie dwuwymiarowych struktur atomowych. W: Uniwersytet Jagielloński [on-line]. [dostęp 2014-06-02]. Ewald Hiebl: Christian Doppler: life and work, principle and applications. Living Edition, 2007, s. 31. ISBN 9783901585098.

A= B = C ? (right UP CORNER below pic. ) ?????

sorry for English please help me TRANSLATE this paragraph ! ? it is key to solve problem !

DID YOU READ IN BOOKS about DOPPLER ! oryginal polish ( my langue ) "Gdy źródło porusza się prostopadle do prostej łączącej odbiornik ze źródłem (α = 90°), nie zmienia swej odległości od odbiornika, pomimo tego odbiornik odbiera falę o częstotliwości innej niż nadawana: " Google tlanslator : When the source moves perpendicular to the line connecting the receiver with the source (α = 90 °) does not change its distance from the receiver, although the receiver receives the wave at a frequency other than that transmitted: Please find in English Book the same words ( English doppler it is not Polish ? ) GIVE ME INFO I MUST INFORM AUTHOR below book about mistake ! INTERNAL CONTRADICTION ! ? ( EUREKA ?!) or WE HAVE DOPPLER ? or WE HAVE ZERO ? oryginal polish ( my langue ) I marked by red RING "Gdy źródło porusza się prostopadle do prostej łączącej odbiornik ze źródłem (α = 90°), nie zmienia swej odległości od odbiornika, pomimo tego odbiornik odbiera falę o częstotliwości innej niż nadawana: "

o1 observer 1 o2 observer 2 ... ..... .... o3 o4 .... on-1 .... on ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL ME THAT DOPPLER NOT EXIST !!!!???? X1 = X1 sorry for my ilustrations "quality " but .... You are people who schould see this problem I showed You TWO different situation ( You no need be inside Planet's center to evaluate doopler ) mirror = observer ? Michelson Morley ? it is not DOPPLER ? WE NO NEED SPEAK ABOUT PLANE ( we can be in DEEP space ) zero planets only SOURCE and SENSORS (mirrors) Respect to what in my test I see RED ?

THANK YOU I RIGHT NOW STUDING NEW PROBLEM TERMODYNAMICA ( methabolism ) and DOPPLER food = fuel ( methabolism = information haw fast we exchange fuel for ENERGY ) it is 100% fresh idea even for Einstein ( RIGHT down Corner see three brothers ) http://i65.tinypic.com/kdttf5.jpg Minkowski ? please evaluate WOKR / ENERGY - WHY ? I can not ? Mathematica ? = problem Physics = problem ? OR Einstein = problem ? I showed You all drawings I showed You equations ( books physics - DOPPLER) .... Where You see problem ??? I'm sorry I already made test I see RED I don't know WHY ?! sorry for langue but I showed Equations ! ( do You see mistake ? ) You told about Star I hope that my drawing explain that BIG planet = Small planet and moon ! ???? where is problem ???

ok ???? wait please ??? Very Important Question ? ( Person on moon see RED SHIFT ) ? Yes/ No ( please not look on big planet now we speak only about moon )

No Doppler from light on Earth. Omega = V1 / L moon for You = Doppler what about " huge planet " it is not DOPPLER ???

Ok ??? .... Ok ??? can we do this test in space Vacuum ? ( for example not exist air near Earth ) Stars ? .... can I made my own star ? .... why ? I'm sure that my own star is on the Earth and is moving with Earth I can measure electric parameters ( AMM Voltage ) I'm sure Distance me ----star left star is on the Earth right star is in space ! ( right star = doppler ) left no ???? Bulb on aifel tower = Star ? Thank You for reply ! Can I use bulb to build STAR ? it is star or not ???

situation A Here We have Doppler ? source >v1 .......................sensor>>v2 situation B Here We have doppler ? ....................................................................................................................................................^V2 .................................................^V1.............................................................................................^ x---------------R------------------Source-------------------------------L-------------------------------------Sensor BELOW PLEASE FIND IN BOOKS it is not my Equation ( physics) https://pl.wikipedia.../Efekt_Dopplera I want to ASK again ( above I showed You DOPPLER definition books - physics ) please use above equation to evaluate below problem ! first please do this for one arm later ...for 4 arms http://images.tinypic.pl/i/00765/8g7j8biccn4d.jpg Above equation is ok ? ( true / false ) ??? ( right down corner above ilustration I showed You example - secoundary school ) May I use this drawing and evaluate below tool (precission ) ? http://i64.tinypic.com/2isb1og.jpg if No please explain if Yes please explain Respect to what Earth is moving ? ( Important is place where the signal started ?) it is stationary point ?

homework more help PLEASE DO HOMEWORK ! please not read single fact ! (above I showed You 5 years my work ) Please not trust me please please do Homework ! ( i will be happy after You finish you own work !) More help ( TEMPERATURE and IDEAL LINE ? not exist FLAT LINE and FLAT physics ! INVERSE SQUARE LAW ! ) please evaluate Doppler ONLY for ONE SINGLE ARM and only for one speed ! ( RIGHT DOWN CORNER ) STILL WORKS ? not moving ? not moving respect to what ? I showed You Maxwell DARK BOX 100% source--------------1m-------------sensor source--------------1000m-------------sensor How big force is pushing sensor ? ( colour ) Where force is hiting Sensor ? ( Ideal center hit ? TORQUE ? exist or not exist ? )