TokyoDefender

My point is: The hypothesis we currently have for evolution is seriously flawed. This is a post to make you question what we are taught. It may be a little crazy but i believe it gets my point across: Rethink what you know

Like most scientists endy has missed the point. He goes for the least challenging topic and avoids the entire rest of the argument. I could not ask for a more textbook response.

Evolution: Often thought to be the final theory by the layman, this topic often comes under scrutiny from ill guided creationists and the argument is never settled. I am here to tell you that the argument is over, and has been from the very beginning. Now you have heard this all before granted, but try to reason with this one for a moment, let it sink real deep before surfacing again. When life arrived here on earth it was nothing short of a miracle. Landing with an asteroid in a toxic ocean is an impressive feat if not for the improbability of it all. Ill give you that there are some creatures that could survive it. The tardigrade is one, but that is a multi-cellular life for which would not have developed yet. Other creatures that are unicellular are bacterial extremophiles. But again this makes no sense because they could not adapt quick enough to the changing pH of the toxic ocean as it grew calm. We will overlook this as many scientists do and move forward a few million years to the first amphibious creature. Fish swim in the sea, meaning they filter oxygen through their gills. Let us say that one day a fish evolves to have lungs and gills. He starts to breath and his gills work because gills are all a fish uses and there is no brain activity connecting the new lungs to anywhere. This is what we call an advanced tumor. The fish will never use his lungs because there is no need to go anywhere and get beached, even if you can breath above ground. Simply put, fish do not desire to strand themselves on land, it goes against simple survival skills. Nevertheless we move forward some years and we see that a fish has sprouted legs and a desire to walk. Our fish hybrid decides to take a walk and gets hungry. He has lost his way and has no food. There is no fauna because the only life has evolved on the cellular level. the fish is amazed at how he survived this long. The plot holes start to multiply as the fish thinks about this. He realizes the only way to eat is being a carnivore. He questions how the plants that somehow exist evolved to not have a complex, reasoning brain, the obviously better choice of evolving. We continue to push on to the end of life as we knew it with the fish dying off because of over of themselves. The earth becomes barren and desolate, despite having liquid water, a rich atmosphere, and a home in the Goldilocks zone of planetary orbits in relation to the sun. The fish dies. Explain how we evolved now.