I think of an atom as being far more complex than simply a microscopic ball.
It has energy, positive and negative charges, and that electron is apparently 'moving' around a nucleus at an incredibly fast rate - so fast that its more like a 'shell'. Atoms can do more than merely 'exist' as a tiny dot.
What actually is an electron? just a charged speck? what actually is a positive or negative charge? a force of some kind?
I'm saying we're not just inanimate atoms, but we're also energy and forces.
Thanks for the welcome!
Your reply explains a few things for me, I was thinking it would be an instrinsic property, but was wondering why I couldn't find data of that kind for specific substances.
Can you talk about the reasons for the differences in efficiency of NaCl vs KOH?
I'd chosen a few compounds that I have some interaction with, thinking I might be able to use the data. Eg. If I leave a container of ethanol fuel with the lid off for a while, could I get a very rough approximation of how much water it will absorb in a certain time. But it sounds like it would do more evaporating than absorbing of water - which means I shouldn't be as worried about water getting into my fuel as I used to be.
Is there a standard, commonly used measurement for the rate of absorption for hygroscopic solids and liquids?.
I'm looking for a comparison of the hygroscopicity of various substances such as:
Calcium nitrate
Potassium Hydroxide
Ethanol
Sulfuric acid
Eg, if I have 1L of Ethanol, with a given surface area exposed, for a given temperature and humidity, can I calculate a quantity of water absorbed per unit of time?
How would I compare the rate of water absorption between KOH and NaCl?
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.