I would disagree that we cannot destroy her. It is my opinion, for example, that the Sahara desert is largely man made. One reason I hold this (non-mainstream) view is because of Paul Ehrlich (1970) ... http://www.amazon.com/Population-Resources-Environment-Issues-Ecology/dp/0716706806/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1464189220&sr=8-2&keywords=paul+ehrlich+anne+ehrlich ... He reportedly wrote ... "the vast Sahara desert itself is largely man-made, the result of overgrazing, faulty irrigation, deforestation, perhaps combined with a shift in the course of a jet stream." Quoted here ... https://books.google.com/books?id=r8l-DMj3XTgC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=sahara+desert+ehrlich&source=bl&ots=rmhfRlpuWE&sig=fybb7f8_7RMXeX6P45zD7fl5HEM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjpw82hwfXMAhVVSlIKHVO1ALIQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=sahara%20desert%20ehrlich&f=false ...
I'm ordering Ehrlich's book today to examine his arguments.
From my studies, it appears that TREES and TREED AREAS (woodland) is the last great refuge for mankind. We have one more chance in my opinion to get agriculture right ... or go extinct, along with many other species. I think our only hope is to "colonize woodland" with sustainable food production, then focusing on healing other land types - degrading cropland and pasture, for example.