Duration

That's Motor Daddy to you. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged This statement bothers me. What do you mean to measure a torque in two different reference frames? Please give a simple example, such as using a teeter totter. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedHere's a possibility for a test of torque. If the acceleration of gravity were to remain the same, and the Earth's mass were to remain the same, and the distance measured from a specific distance from the center of the Earth, if you hung a rock off the handle of a torque wrench, suspended in air, and the drive part of the wrench securely fastened to a immobile object, in a fashion that the torque wrench was roughly parallel to the ground, if the torque read 100 lb-ft, and seemingly stayed at 100 lb-ft, would the torque reading change as time marched on? Would the torque stay the same or get less?

Procrastinate has a duration, beat the wife is a motion. Motion occurs over a duration. The duration occurred, but the beating did not.

I never admitted to beating my wife, you assumed I started to beat her, and then asked a ridiculous question of when I stopped. I never started! There was zero work done. None, nadda, zilch!

There was no work done. There is no perpetual motion.

So again, the Earth is traveling away from the sun. In the past, the Earth was inside the sun. If you want to say the Earth is still inside the sun, that's fine with me, as the sun is the solar system's core, the Earth just got further away from the sun's core. It just got further away. It just got further away. It just got further away.

No matter what time interval you look at, I never beat my wife the entire time. Go look at videos of past time periods, there is no record of me ever beating my wife. There is however a record of the Earth being closer to the sun in the past.

I am talking about reality. Motion occurs in a duration of time. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged ouchhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

That would be power you are speaking of, work/time. If I beat my wife with a torque wrench, work got done in a interval of time, that is power=work/time. Torque is always balanced (you know, the whole equal and opposite thing). In order to have a force there must be an equal and opposite force. Distance divides that force.

I gave you a time interval. Torque has no time, but it has a radius.

What time interval do you want to look at?

So if the distance changes the AU standard changes?

Word games, eh? I guess that's all your science has left, word games. What is the radius now? What is the radius in 100,000,000 years?

Generally, does the radius get larger or smaller?

I don't care to know the shape of the orbit, I want to know the shape of the orbit a million years ago, as compared to the shape of the orbit one hundred million years from now. Does the orbit's circumference get larger or smaller as time goes on?

Garbage. There is only two possible directions of travel, in or out, take your pick!

Contradict reality? Show me the radius from 10,000,000 years ago, and show me the radius 100,000,000 years from now. That should be a long enough period to get a firm grasp of the direction of travel, eh?

So how did the "test the Earth's radius from the Sun" experiment turn out?

Reality, Klaynos, something you and your Einsteinien look alike peers know nothing about. You're too hooked on illusions to know what reality is. It should be classified as a controlled substance and locked away, forever. Einstein's relativity that is.

Yawn. When you get tired of chasing your tail, take my idea and show the world. Take it, Klaynos, or Swansont, and see how far it takes you. Heck, I got you guys by the balls, see how far it got me, and it all started arguing about torque.

No, the question now has an answer, as I already answered it, and correctly I might add. The mass comes from the core and travels away. Matter does not crash into the nucleus, it comes from it. There is no perpetual motion. LOGIC, Klaynos.

Belief has nothing to do with science! :rolleyes:

The time was right.

Does the Earth get further away from the Sun?

Before you say another word to me, I want to know from you, in one word, does the Earth get farther away from the Sun? Yes or no?

I use the very standards that we have created, so when I speak, it is correct, because I use the standards properly, unlike Einstein's illusions, which are not mathematically sound, ie, it isn't reality, it's an illusion of perception. As Klaynos already pointed out, torque is always correct, it doesn't lie!