Ostronomos

The only reason I made reference to it was simply because it merges language (which it claims is more than just gibberish) with reality. In this case I will talk about reality without reference to CTMU.

Why was this thread moved to speculations? I only speculated about one point. And I used the word "If". If I remove the CTMU bullshit comment will you return the thread to its appropriate subforum? I take it as an insult.

Correct. Which implies that spacetime is capable of being warped, twisted and curved. Which does not preclude the possibility of it having a beginning. IMPLICATIONS: We know that spacetime is real. And Wheeler proposed a more fundamental idea than the ADM reformulation of General Relativity in which the dynamic geometry of a spacetime (reality) curvature changes with time. Suppose that Reality (which is supposedly absolute and not relative to anything as a whole) changes with time, then are we speaking about absolute reality (as a whole set?) or relative reality (objects existing within reality itself?) which changes with time? And does absolute reality change at the same rate as relative reality? Hence, the implications of this answer to General (and special?) relativity. OTHER THINGS THAT ARE REAL THAT CHANGE: If language is more than just human created gibberish, then the universe possesses it's own language, the SCSPL (see CTMU). This means that it really does evolve through its grammatical processors. As time moves forward, grammar moves foward as we utter the rhythm of each letter of a word. Don't forget entropy.

Wheeler wanted to reduce physics to geometry in an even more fundamental way than the ADM reformulation of general relativity with a dynamic geometry whose **curvature changes with time. ** Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrodynamics If there is a way to verify that curvature is a reality, then we may have laid the first piece of evidence for Wheeler's Quantum Geometrodynamics. Nicholas Ibrahim Hosein, 2016.