I need to set a single ground rule here, since this is an entirely theoretical question (until we get to the point of technology to prove otherwise)
The ground rule is simply how we are (theoretically) controlled through some form of life-force (like a soul, typically mentioned in religious belief). If someone can prove me entirely wrong on this ground rule, please mention it to me.
With that said, if we were able to control a small part of our brains using that life force and only such, what would happen if we were able to control our entire brain?
Of course, my belief is that we are incapable of controlling our brain due to some external force preventing us, perhaps to prevent the destruction of the universe (but of course, that's entirely theorized).
My questions currently are the following:
- Would we be able to physically evolve ourselves much more quickly using our brains potential?
- What would be a downside, or a "limitation" of our brains?
- Would there be a "safety" measure to prevent our likely deaths from overexertion of the brain / body?
I want to hear all about your opinions, facts, and what not.
I am not studying neurology or anything brain-related, so I really cannot prove anyone wrong with factual statements that relate. That is also why I decided to put that 'life-force' ground rule in, because I cannot prove that we control our brains in any other way that I would understand. Once again, if someone proves differently, I'll update this post.
Now, bombard me with science!!
-Kon