Zarkov

New Theory of Gravity Spin Gravity Find out more, explore Zarkov's Pseudo Science !!!!!

Aman, they tell me jumping on your head down here prevents the Moon illusion near the horizon!!! Maybe you guys should do the same, Ha Ha. PS for your massive drought, install pyramid water, just give me a call!!

Some more info on the pioneer anomoly........ After the discovery of this unexplained acceleration, in 1980, John D. Anderson and Eunice L. Lau decided to keep track of the anomaly. At that time, they assumed it was a navigation modeling error, and didn’t give it high priority. They expected the anomaly would go away but it did not. In 1994, Michael Martin Nieto contacted Anderson about how to tell if Newton’s laws hold on interplanetary distance scales. He was astounded when he learned of the acceleration anomaly. Discussions with others in the physics community emphasized that before the claim could be taken seriously, an independent computer code would be needed to determine if the same result could be obtained. Several people came on board, including Philip A. Laing and Anthony S. Liu of The Aerospace Corporation. Using both the JPL and Aerospace Corporation navigation software, they analyzed in detail the data from January 1987 to July 1995. During that time, the Deep Space Network had generated and delivered reduced radio Doppler data to Anderson and Lau, so it was available. They concluded that there remained an unmodeled acceleration towards the Sun of approximately (8.79 +/- 1.25) x 10-8 centimeters/second. The results were published in Physical Review Letters in 1998. It’s possible that it’s due to some possible systematic problem that hasn’t been identified. However, some have proposed modifying Newton’s laws. One such proposal is called Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), which proposes that the normal gravitational force, which square of the distance, is modified at very large distances. At such distances, the gravitational force would decrease as the inverse of the distance, instead of the square of the distance. Therefore, the gravitational force would be stronger than you would otherwise expect. However, MOND does not attempt to explain why this is. The modification is just added in an ad hoc way. It doesn’t follow logically from any fundamental theory of gravity we currently have. Now, someone could come up with such a theory, but so far no one has attempted to do this, as far as I know. In the past, we detected that the rotation of the spiral galaxies is different than you would expect from Newtonian mechanics. Some people at that time suggested MOND as an explanation, but instead the physics community settled on the simpler explanation that the galaxies were surrounded by dark matter. There was independent that there was dark matter in the universe to explain cosmological effects. I propose that the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 is also due to dark matter. During the origin and history of the Solar System, the Sun would gravitationally attract nearby dark matter which would accumulate around the Sun. By now, the Sun would be at the center of a ball of dark matter. The Pioneer 10 probe would feel the gravitational attraction not just of the Sun but of the Sun plus the surrounding dark matter which would appear to us as an extra acceleration towards the Sun.

Review of the Anomalous Doppler Data from Pioneer 10 and 11 Curtis E. Renshaw, William L. Kallfelz Tele-Consultants, Inc., 680 America’s Cup Cove, Alpharetta, GA 30005 (September 29, 1998) Abstract Pioneer 10/11 radio metric data indicate an apparent, constant skewing between predicted and observed Doppler shifts. This indicates a possible acceleration of 8.5 X 10-8 cm/s2 toward the Sun for both craft. Gravitometric models and systemic problems fail to explain the discrepancy. The anomalous signals seem to indicate an error in the relativistic Doppler equations rather than any new physics. Letter Anomalous Pioneer 10/11 Doppler data has been interpreted as a constant acceleration toward the Sun at ~ 8.0 X 10-8 cm/s2, [1]. Potential modeled causes change with time, act in the wrong direction or are too negligible in size to produce the offset, requiring a look at the algorithms that convert signals observed on Earth to a more inertial frame, such as the solar barycenter. Complex in practice, the modifications are conceptually simple. The Earth is a non-inertial system compared with a reference frame stationary or linearly moving with respect to the Sun, with gravitational and motional effects modeled to great precision. Time read on an array of clocks on Earth is converted to that of a hypothetical clock in a gravitationally uniform, perfectly circular Solar orbit, referred to as TDB, Barycentric Dynamical Time. TDB represents a fixed offset from a hypothetical clock in the inertial solar barycenter reference frame, through which all observations are ultimately transformed, [2,3]. Data received from Pioneer 10/11 is transformed to TDB, then to solar barycenter time, or some similar defined-inertial frame. Data then appears as if the receivers were in the solar barycenter reference frame. The reduced data is compared to the 13 cm S-band signal transmitted to the spacecraft. After conversion to the solar barycenter frame, two-way light times provide range data. Doppler shifted received signals used as inputs to the special relativistic Doppler expression determine the measured spacecraft velocity. Gravitational models that predict the degree of slowing over time are very precise, and provide the expected velocity for any time period or range, given the spacecraft’s trajectory history. When the observed Doppler shift is compared to the expected value from gravitational modeling, there is a constant residual offset that correlates to the numerical difference between Newtonian and special relativistic Doppler equations. One-way special relativistic and Newtonian radial Doppler shifts, denoted "S" and "N" respectively, [4], are: (1) (2) In the current study, the "time-dilation" term in (1), composed of two parts due to spacecraft and TDB velocities with respect to solar barycenter, is the primary difference between special relativistic and Newtonian radial Doppler equations. Experiment confirms clock slowing due to an induced velocity measured against an ideal inertial frame, demonstrated notably in GPS and muon lifetime measurements at CERN. If clock slowing is due to some mechanism other than the hypothesized relativistic time dilation, then the special relativistic Doppler equation is incorrect, and the Newtonian equation is preferred, [5]. Assuming the validity of (2), then application of (1) in converting from TDB to solar barycenter frame for a 30 km/sec Earth velocity introduces an apparent constant frequency offset of -5.00 x 10-9 Hz/Hz. An additional apparent frequency offset due to the use of (1) versus (2) in converting from solar barycenter to the 12.24 km/sec Pioneer spacecraft is -8.32 x 10-10 Hz/Hz. Applied to the Doppler equations, these offsets translate to a residual shift in frequency of -5.83 x 10-9 Hz/Hz, one-way only. If equation (2) is correct, these offsets will appear as a steady frequency drift in the Deep Space Network of –5.83 x 10-9 Hz/s. Dividing by the S-band carrier frequency results in a perceived constant clock acceleration of -at = –2.53 x 10-18 s/s2. Since such a consistent, systemic acceleration of all clocks is unlikely, the offset may be viewed as an anomalous spacecraft acceleration of ap = atc, or ap = 7.59 x 10-8 cm/s2, independent of distance and constant for a given spacecraft velocity. Apparent sunward acceleration increases proportionally with spacecraft velocity, not 1/r2 as a gravitational force would indicate. If the anomaly is due to a preference for the Newtonian radial Doppler expression, one also expects the observed correlation between Aerospace Corporation’s Compact High Accuracy Satellite Motion Program and Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Orbit Determination Program, as they apply the same Doppler methodology. The authors of [1] state "it is interesting to speculate on the possibility that the origin of the anomalous signal is new physics." More likely the result is an artifact of the equations chosen to model the Doppler effect, requiring a closer look at equations comparing light-times, clock rates and Doppler frequency shifts.

More spin gravity lines of force Spin gravity lines of force...see this link showing temperature correlations http://www.sprl.umich.edu/GCL/paper_to_html/evolut_clim.html

"Apparent sunward acceleration increases proportionally with spacecraft velocity, not 1/r2 as a gravitational force would indicate. " Yes going out against angular momentum, therefore more energy required, going in pick up energy. This is all spin gravity > Maybe ?? still thinking

Spin Gravity ! "Scientists have detected a mysterious gravitational-like force which is pulling on distant spacecraft. They became aware of the force after analyzing the trajectories of four deep-space probes. "It is almost as if the probes are not behaving according to the known law of gravity," said Dr John Anderson, of the American space agency's (Nasa) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the scientist heading the study into this anomaly. "We've been working on this problem for several years, and we have accounted for everything we could think of." Pioneer 10, one of the probes being affected by the mystery force, was launched towards the outer planets in 1972. It is now far beyond Jupiter but still in radio contact with Earth. By studying the Doppler shift of the radio signals from the craft, scientists have been able to calculate, very precisely, how fast it is travelling. The puzzle is that Pioneer 10 is slowing more quickly than it should. At first, scientists speculated that the slowing might be due to the gravitational pull of some nearby, unseen object. However, when the trajectory of Pioneer 10's sister spacecraft, Pioneer 11, launched in 1973, was analyzed, it was found that it too was being subjected to the same mysterious pull. Since Pioneer 11 is on the opposite side of the Solar System from Pioneer 10, the effect cannot be the gravitational force of some unseen body. "Our analysis strongly suggests that it is difficult to understand how any of these mechanisms can explain the magnitude of the observed behaviour of the Pioneer anomaly," Anderson's team stated. The mystery deepened when it was revealed that the same unexplained force has been affecting on the Galileo spacecraft on its journey to Jupiter, and the Ulysses spaceprobe that is orbiting the Sun. Several scientists have noted that the strength of the effect seems to be related to two of the Universe's physical constants: the speed of light and the speed of the expansion of the Universe. If this were true it would suggest a fundamental flaw in our understanding of gravity. " Exerp from ? I will supply the link later if can get it >

Hi Halogen, well then that could well be the case in that instan't, if that was his opinion. Except we could test some of the cheese theory here on rat infested Earth......reason why we don't have as much cheese here!!! Tassie.......... Cold, cold and more cold.....miserable being stuck indoors, but at least we got plenty of water, not like some of the poor USA citizens.

Yes Radical E, you hit the nail on the head. This example has evidence contrary to experience re cheese, smell etc. Now the rub....just because I do not agree with some accepted opinions (theories etc) does not make my science incorrect. I would be the first to complain about that aspect. I have laid out several new opinions, so??? I challenge people to show me the science is incorrect........and don't tell me it doesn't agree with such and such's opinion........ Speak the science not the theory, please

OK, point taken, but I am new to this internet, and the thought I have presented are extreemly ancient for me. I generally have left the references behind, and formulated and opinion, and acted upon it.. When I see new evidence I note it mentally, but generally do not collect data anymore. I have generated a lot of debate on the ABC SSSF, and there is a lot of submitted data there. But generally it doesn't interest me now, except to warn other people. And yes I have had my share of collegues trying to debunk me. But obviouslt this is not just science, it is a chigly charged emotional issue as well. NOT to mention liability for governments leglislating to allow "accepted" levels of metals in our food, and manufacturing processes. Think about it, fertalizers made from smelter wastes, lead previously in canning, metal additions to the water supply, metal leached from pipelines.........this list is staggering.

Radical E, sorry I missed your post. Quarks, tell me more about the building blocks of matter. Newtonian gravity maths is based upon centripetal force formulae, coupled with Kepler's law. I have yet to complete the maths, but basically it simplifies the whole mess, and actually fits into reality correctly. But ? quarks, I am willing to hear your opinion

I would then suggest that the more "radical" one scores then the more accepted science is in need of an overhaul. But let the sheep bleet, and Bar every new thought, without even knowing the first principles of science or it's methodology. Come and visit my corner of the forum sometime and judge for yourself if it is The Cutting Edge of Science

I do not subscribe to general relativity >

Why, this is your life?? if you are interested, then find out more, or just believe me, or ignore this or take offence and attack me, it is your call. I am qualified in this area and I have taken note >

Is that evidence, well all my past papers, references are out of my reach. I do hope to get more organised, but the truth is out there, now you know what you are looking for, if you are worried BUT as has been pointed out this is PSEUDOSCIENCE >

Thanks, Aman. Light is a wave constrained by wave mechanics, in the medium it travels in. A speed boat can easily out run the waves produced. There is no limitation to speed except construction restraints

Pre internet, I carried out extensive literature research, now it could be much easier. I have conducted pathology estimations of indicators such as serum uric acid and cholesterol. I have noted the improvement of "average" people to treatment. If you wish you may debunk me, but I wager america to a brick, that you will find dan\mming evidence, especially for the childhoods for the current adults......This is in all the western world.

Neutrons are fundamental to everything. All matter may be spin different types of spin in the magnetic ether. At absolute zero there is no ?spin, neutron are still sources of magnetism. To actually delve right down to the bottom, eg quarks etc, is no fundamental to gross observed behaviours, but I expect eventual answers there will be applicable to gross states of matter. Particles in a vacuum.... therefore there is no absolute vacuum, ie space devoid of matter. Magnetism is all pervaiding.

If you are good at maths Aman, maybe we could work together. The maths woulf involve centifugal, centripetal forces and precession, Maxwells equations etc. >

Dementia comes from a whole alloy of metals, lead metal is very swift in it's nervous destruction. Others are slow

I do know the great pyramids were built on a very large bed rock structure, maybe granit, but I am not sure. The blocks were limestone, huge granits condensation slabs were in the chambers. Several scientific explorations of the weathering of the base of the Sphinx, have concluded it was due to water.

When you wish to discuss the theories I will help you understand until then I welcome all constructive criticism

Evidence Mr Fafalone, please!!!!! Metal posioning can effect gene expression in the womb.......you want to shut the gate after the horse is bolted, OK

Mr Fafalone ( better get it correct), the explanations you hang onto are simply incorrect. If I give you a heart attack, I am truely sorry, either wait for the whole story to unfold or leave me to my PSEUDOSCIENCE. Personally I would prefer the later. Thanks for you correcting and informative critism. It is comming like a bombshell.

Sorry Everyone this thread has got off topic, so lets get is back on track. Many modern diseases are the consequences of metal posioning. Such as heart attacks, Alzheimers disease, Autism, mental problems eg Bipolar, depression, insominia and numerous others. Basically if you compared a person's health in a backwoods area with a inner city person's health then you would appreciate the consequences of slow insideous metal posioning.