koti

I presume there isn't much rationality directly related to the subject which could get you out of the very bad place you're in, as a last resort I'll try the below, guess which stage you are in right now and tell me how do you plan to evolve: Four stages of competence Unconscious incompetence The individual does not understand or know how to do something and does not necessarily recognize the deficit. They may deny the usefulness of the skill. The individual must recognize their own incompetence, and the value of the new skill, before moving on to the next stage. The length of time an individual spends in this stage depends on the strength of the stimulus to learn.[5] Conscious incompetence Though the individual does not understand or know how to do something, they recognize the deficit, as well as the value of a new skill in addressing the deficit. The making of mistakes can be integral to the learning process at this stage. Conscious competence The individual understands or knows how to do something. However, demonstrating the skill or knowledge requires concentration. It may be broken down into steps, and there is heavy conscious involvement in executing the new skill.[5] Unconscious competence The individual has had so much practice with a skill that it has become "second nature" and can be performed easily. As a result, the skill can be performed while executing another task. The individual may be able to teach it to others, depending upon how and when it was learned.

We haven’t evolved from Apes, we evolved parallel as cousins. In fact we are closer or further cousins with any other life form on Earth, there is no magic in it, its a well established scientific fact with mountains of evidence for it and zero evidence going for the people who refuse to accept evolution. You probably didn’t hear the news but the carholic church accepts evolution, this is the 21st century not the holy inquisition, you got your centuries mixed up.

I see that there is a special, cozy place in your heart for Assange I won’t be crying after him, he always seemed a manipulative publicity craving freak who thinks is a superhero. Didn’t he have his own TV show for some Russian TV channel some time ago?

Its been many years but I recall US being pissed at him for taking refuge in that embassy and suddenly the sexual charges appeared from nowhere. I never followed this whole case closely but back then 7 or 8 years ago it seemed fairly obvious that the charges were cooked to help the US het rid of a very serious security pain which he was/is. He should be put in front of a court for thinking hes above laws and deciding to compromise others’ lives for publicity but the sexual charges looked shady at least from what I remember years ago.

Do you think the sexual assault charges are real or part of the pollitical game?

Isn't Putin waiting for him with open arms?

Yes, thats why asked Q-reeus what exactly he means hoping he will bring up some form of QGT. Maybe he doesn’t understand that Newtonian gravity was not rendered wrong by GR but instead was expanded uppon by it and that the same mechanism will take place when GR is expanded uppon by a broader theory encompasing quantum gravity. Most certainly whatever theory will acomplish that, will not render GR wrong. Whoever stops riding his bicycle when he gets his drivers licence saying the bike is now broken is just silly isn’t he.

I agree, lets do that.

I’m sory but both of the links you gave are dead (to the SFN thread and to the vixra site) So far we only know that you disagree with GR and youre looking for alternatives in crackpot nests like vixra.org. Plus you do not decide when the conversation is over, the rules you agreed to when you joined this forum do net let you decide when the conversation is over.

Sounds like some exotic ( crackpot if you ask me) attempt at explaining the behaviour of gravity in the BH context, using physics nomenclature to fool people into believing its something worthwhile. Your vixra link is not opening which I would say is probably a good thing because its a crackpot site posing as legitimate science. So let me get this straight, are you saying that GR is wrong and you’re looking for alternatives?

What do you mean whichever theory of gravity proves true, what exactly is on the table for you?

Which theory are you refering to?

This Ladies & Gentlemen is what happens when you actually do something useful instead of running around demanding usage of pronouns. You go girl!

Not familiar with this one, will read up on this now, thanks! Edit: From the wiki link above: "At 3.9 billion M☉ (a rather large super-massive black hole), a fuzzball would have a radius of 77 astronomical units—about the same size as the termination shock of our solar system's heliosphere—and a mean density equal to that of the Earth's atmosphere at sea level (1.2 kg/m3)." It's a long shot but assuming the below image is semi-correct it just might render the fuzzbal theory correct because the distances seem to add up:

My knowledge is limited but it would seem extremely exotic that matter which forms structures all over the universe like stars, planets, houses, animals would suddenly decide that its capable of squashing itself into a region so small its undefined, keep its mass and not rip the universe into oblivion. Not a very scientific statement, I know...but common.

It's totally off charts to everybody. Our current state of physics cannot explain the true nature of black hole singularities, certainly to me its completely mind blowing.

And there we don't really have a basis of defining space not to mention volume so we probably can't even use the concept of "occupy" or "volume".

Heres something to put it all into perspective, there are more Hydrogen atoms in a teaspoon of water than there is tea spoons of water in all Earth's oceans. A Hydrogen atom size is 10^-9 m and the Planck length starts at 10^-34 m: Since the singluarity is below Planck length territory where the concept of left/right up/down straight/backwords stop to have meaning, the very question if a singularity has volume has no meaning.

As far as I know, our current knowledge of particle physics and quantum mechanics cannot determine whether a singularity has volume. Most probably the question whether it has volume or not might not be relevant at all since volume is a region occupied in space and this becomes something differnt for a singularity with the extreme spacetime curvature. I would presume that on the quantum level the region of a singularity is non zero volume but we can never measure that from our outside reference frames.

I think a singularity in any black hole doesn't really have a size nor volume.

The black hole is approximately 6.5 billion masses of our sun.

This video explains it pretty well:

Dang, you were first with it. Lets take monthly turns!

Thats not it for me, like Stringy said hes an evangelist for atheism and I would prefer him give people more pure science information than keep on mangling the same semantical crusade. I was in love with Dawkins when I was younger and I don’t want to take anything away from him I just think he could be more efficient.

I agree, bad choice of words from me.