koti

Gas 2 Euro per litre starting this fall.

Yep, thats why I think that the whole fuss around consciousness/awareness is complete bs.

Wow, I wasn’t aware that something like that could exist. Its a lot weirder that a grown man insisting on accepting that he identifies with being a 6 year old girl. Then again, a link would be good.

Still less f up than evangelists from the American south The snow plowing made me laugh, I feel sory for his wife and kids though. What makes me laugh too, is this righty interviewer treating this whole thing as something that we should be concerned about legisatively. Why doesn’t he target polygamy in the US south for example? Theres surely more of that going in than grown men thinking they’re 6 year old girls...and its surely hurting a lot more people than this poor bastard.

Why don’t you say: c is invariant regardless of medium which it travels in, massless particles travel at c regardless of the motion of the source or the inertial reference frame of the observer.

LoL !

You got us inSe. Your incisivness to hunt us down is almost as keen and subtle as your physics.

It’s a fluke but you actually got that right. Unfortunately the rest of what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense.

This might be helpful in phrasing more coherently what you want to state in the future: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference No, thats not what you said. You said: Do you have anything to back up your claim that c is not invariant?

There is a decent explanation here.

Looks like we have yet another Nobel in physics contender, so many of those on the forum. Its c by the way not C, and its invariant regardless of medium.

So if any life is present on WASP-107b we can assume they speak in high pitch voices.

I presume that the link you posted is work by Rupert Sheldrake who is a researcher of parapsychology and his work is widely accepted by the scientific community as pseudoscience. Since he couldn’t come up with anything that makes sense in his own field, I wonder if his insights in physics are maybe...bull sh**?

I hope I didn't get to ya with that "geriatric" comment. Or do I ?

Yep, worked for me. This one does even better for me:

It is a difficult task to lead a discussion if you chose to comprehend reproduction as cell reproduction and not procreaction when the context is extremely clearly pointing to the latter.

Many people are incapable of reproduction yet they are undoubtedly aware.

The post production conversion into an acid trip is a con for this movie in my opinion. Do yourself a favor and don't watch it.

I probably enjoyed Donnie Darko most due to two things, the 80’s vibe/music and that the film conveys quite a few motives which happen in parallel and then cross with each other, I like that in a movie. I’ve seen „The Box”, it was fairly enjoyable, not as much as Donnie Darko though. I’ll pitch „A Scanner Darkly” but you probably seen that too.

„Donnie Darko” - 2001.

Your above analogy visualizes time and it looks good. Kip's statement does something else, it implies causality between time dilation (cause) and gravity (effect) I think it's just momentary bad choice of words, I can't imagine him sticking to this if asked, it's just plain wrong.

My Last name is Kot******i, when I was making my living as a house DJ in the 90’s I had to come up with a nick for myself and ended up with „koti” which means „home” in Finnish language and is a shorty for my surname...so it fitted well I thought. My avatar is my face.

It’s pretty clear where from and where to you are getting with this statement. By the way, you claim to solve „the riddle of quantum reality” without a single equation in your article. Where is the math?

I know these, i’ve seen them lots of times, they’re a special kind of bird called: ”Shoot at higher ISO with a faster shutter speed”

God is allmighty ya’ll should remember that and don’t listen to them scientists actin like they know it all.