mcmagicalone

but no ozone without the lightning producing naturally, and you lose energy converting ac to dc plus it would hardly be a new concept or idea if i didnt use the main stage seeing as how much of the process is already in use the the world, i didnt invent electrolysis, or hydrogen production of it, can hardly patent that can i?

but the additional processes allow for the creation of ozone, the dc electricity is used for electrolysis not the ac electricity derived from photo-voltaic solar cells, and again this is about doing multiple functions at once, for example, the main stage can purify water before it even gets to the electrolysis cells simply by the heat condensing the water into clouds, the dc electricity is required to for electrolysis for more then a dozen elements that can not be derived from any other way then electrolysis, Many of the elements can be put back together depending on what end results you want, say hydrogen and oxygen which provides a large amount of force when mixed together, ran through a turbine, is capable of providing more electricity through the use of a turbine, which will in turn add more power to the other stages. Many elements can only be derived from solutions through the use of electrolysis, and some of these steps are already in place through out the world as it stands. http://www.intpowertechcorp.com/H2_Seawater_1TOFCJ.pdf , https://cleantechnica.com/2015/01/02/new-machine-makes-sustainable-hydrogen-from-seawater/ , and many other projects like this exist, but mine is the only one that can fix the ozone layer and the produce 40+ other elements. Faraday's law of electrolysis states that: ▪ The mass of a substance produced at an electrode during electrolysis is proportional to the number of moles of electrons (the quantity of electricity) transferred at that electrode ▪ The number of Faradays of electric charge required to discharge one mole of substance at an electrode is equal to the number of "excess" elementary charges on that ion These two statements are often considered as separate laws: Faraday's 1st and 2nd laws of electrolysis. so other then the power lost from heat and from power transfer along the wires, there will be little power wasted, and again this is still less about power and more about element generation and manufacture.

convection of heat due to redirected solar energy, provides clouds and air currents, charges the clouds, and provides start up energy to monitors and pumps,

although if i could bring up one point, does anyone at all see any possible reasons of why any of the steps are unfeasible, im on my 11th incarnation of the project, and i believe i solved almost all of the problems with it, but every little bit helps. and i do thank all of you for your time in this matter.

and as to the notes having been published online, i can still patent with the changes to the project. For example,if one company had the patents to a power regulator, and another company made it more efficient the second company can still patent it, if it were not so there would only be one or 2 cell phone providers in the world. the same can be said for head phones, or batteries, drugs like tylenol, or many others where there is the original and the generics. The more complex a machine the easier it is to do multiple patents on it. When the potential pay off of selling research or patents is at 2-5% royalties on a possible multibillion dollar industry over the course of a couple decades. I did look into patent infringment, and this link is decently helpful for covering the basis behind it. plus if anyone wishes to contest me in the patent office, well enjoy the next few years of study on all possible chemicals or pure elements that can be derived from seawater, the steps required to gain them all is quite complex, and then there is the actuall building of the prototype, and covering the glaring holes in the posted notes, which i didnt relize years ago were going to be such massive issues. Granted many of you are probably better funded in your labs, but this is not a small project, ive had to learn power and civil engineering, some electro-chemisty, atmospheric physics, and a few other fields. https://www.quora.com/How-much-differentiation-is-needed-to-avoid-patent-infringementtent

quite right of course, but i did a more then 80 percent change to the notes and operations of the machine, from the process's to the operation of it, as i figured this would get in the way, i was initially asking to get it removed as my lawyer was looking into getting around it , but its always best to double check all possible routes. and for the fiveworlds person has requested info i would require an admin to start a private thread, or to email me personally on my newer accounts email for that info as i was told i am not allowed to post personal information on this site, but i do still have the information like email addresses, name, location of the project, etc. I do thank endy for his post as i did not see that specific site before but i did have the information already.

the point of the project was not so much about electrical generation as it was about gaining 40+ elements for manufacture, repairing the ozone layer, and possibly refreezing and rebuilding the polar ice caps. and the small prototype i have created can already manufacture hydrogen, oxygen, ozone, dc and ac electricity, with a few others from the water im draining from a river. plus i could be wrong, but i cant actually fraud myself by patenting my own work can I? i did originally post these notes in the hopes that people would read it and maybe make suggestions that are not america uses more power then it would produce, or the power gained is negligible, Was kinda hoping something along the lines of people actually reading the notes and realizing that this is not about just power generation, this is about providing cost effective clean water, about fixing the ozone layer before we fry to death, and about trying to provide a cheap source of hydrogen for fuel cells. This is about gaining resources without the harmful emissions generally seen in today's practices, and while america wouldn't even notice the power generated, there is not a single reactor that powers america is there? more like thousands, be it fission, coal, hydro, tidal, solar, wind, geothermal, gas, or the latest attempts at fusion. one solution does not exist for all problems, but to attempt to try and address many problems with one working solution would save a lot of time.

Hello, i have asked years ago if you could please delete this post and the lightning powered electrolysis post, although they are the same posts essentially. I have started a crowd funding project and i am in the midst of patenting my completed paper on this work, but i keep running into the problem that i cant patent my own work with these notes still posted, so i ask again please delete the posts so that i can finally get my project up and running, without being screwed by my misguided attempt at asking for help from the community., i have spent most of the last 5 years working hard of the project and i finally have a chance at finishing it, but i can not patent it if the notes are online. if you cant delete at least hide or something, its not pulliing in readers, or hits to your website except from me and the patent search technicians. as proof that i am who i say i am, if you have the original copy of my notes still on the server, i can say my full name and my old email address for the project.