I am aware a set is Bounded if it has both upper and Lower bound and i know what a Limit point of a set is but how can i show that If S ⊂ R be a "bounded infinite set", then S' ≠∅
Let's call a set "Pseudo compact" if it has the property that every closed cover (a cover consisting of closed sets) have a finite subcover.
Does "Pseudo Compact" in this case the same as "Anti-Compact" ? Then how can we describe the "Pseudo-Compact" subsets of Real Numbers?
Let S = [0,1]. If x and y are in s with x ≠y. How can we show that there are m,n∈N such that x< m/2^n <y. Can the Archimedean Property be used to prove this? If yes, could anyone provide me an insight to do this?
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.