Jump to content

BAC

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BAC

  1. BAC

    A New Theory

    well evidence and the sources have been laid out for you hope you enjoyed this intregueing discussion as much as i have we should do this again some time and next time give me some answers instead of me passing them out i didnt want you to beleave in me i just wanted to be proven wrong so i can gain some more knowledge but good luck with that dudes
  2. BAC

    A New Theory

    here is one site about polonium halo's which you will need if you are to understand us and why your beliefs are outdated and in lack of a better word bullshit http://www.halos.com/ and why the big bang theory has its oh so many flaws this site is great for those who can admit thay were wrong in beleaveing in a theory so simplistic as the big bang theory i did when i was 16 and now i addmit i was wrong heres your proof http://www.odec.ca/projects/2004/khak4a0/public_html/problems.html Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedthats some great info i gave to you.i hope your not a ass and be ungrateful about it
  3. BAC

    A New Theory

    welll we have have reall websites proveing our theory might you want to take a look i mean peer reveiwed thair science organization reveiwed would that be a source good enough for you?
  4. BAC

    A New Theory

    dude would sources count as sites made by sciencetist and science organizations first its proof now its sources im getting a head ache you sure ask for a lot dont you
  5. BAC

    A New Theory

    whats your question? be more specific
  6. BAC

    A New Theory

    hey your not calling me a crack pot like the other guy how sweet and what do you mean you dont understand the entropy thing
  7. BAC

    A New Theory

    prozak explain i am lost in deep thought!
  8. BAC

    A New Theory

    yeah if the godzilla dude knows how to read thats al;l the proof he needs is in what you and me are trying to tell him
  9. BAC

    A New Theory

    it isnt science the big bang theory is false
  10. BAC

    A New Theory

    dude i just did OMG read the thingy Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedprozak why dont you explain it already instead of watching?
  11. BAC

    A New Theory

    :doh:dude if you guys dont beleave me you need to take advise from real scientists alright i have a freind comeing on to explain this better to you guys
  12. BAC

    A New Theory

    dude you shouldnt be a moderator of this site i was so syched to talk to some one smart well here's your proof dick ! polonium halos and granite ultimately prove that the big bang never happened the earth wasnt at a pure hot state of magma as well as the law of conservation of angular momentum" renagade motion well every thing in the universe is spinning according to the bigbang everything should be spinning in the same direction but how can you explain some planets spinning backwards huh? as well as the 1st and 2nd laws of thermo dynamics.
  13. BAC

    A New Theory

    okay well you know the evidence of why the big bang cant be true right? other wise i will start thair.
  14. BAC

    A New Theory

    i must ask are you christian? before i answer your question and fyi im not atheist so dont insult me Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedwell in any case i want one who actually has brains to back fire my theory and prove me wrong i get my theory from the simple thought of what are protons and neutrons made of "quarks and leptons! what are quarks and leptons made of? eventually your going to reach the solid particle that cannot be divided and that should give you the answer to life's creation should it not? but we lack evidence and knowledge in such a subject
  15. it would take a while perhaps thousands of years but without a doubt we can create a computer advanced as ourselfs we are complex beings so this will take us a while mainly becuse we are not sure completly how the brain works as a whole yet...
  16. BAC

    A New Theory

    it is described in the above message you may need to refresh your page sorry for the delay
  17. BAC

    A New Theory

    i have a new theory that backs up true science all beleavers in christ have failed to prove me wrong unlike the theory of the big bang this tends to get a bit more into detail you must at least know a little bit about atoms to understand it but i am not here to propose that the theory is correct i want some one to prove this theory could not scientifically be true... here is a discussion between a best freind and me that went on for about 3 weeks and still continues these are some of the questions i had been asked and how i answered the theory is not fully presented here but it is a broad veiw of what my idea is. "science vs christianity" 1. how did all the different elements come to be in your theory since it was from one partical that replicated(water, light,plasma,rock,air, even flesh & bone?? (THE PARTICLE THAT ISNT OF MATTER WHICH IS THE GOD PARTICLE SELF REPLICATED JUST LIKE A CELL DOES and than than matter was left over by the self replication kind of like energy to an atom being realesed by nuclear fission turning the energy released into radioactivity the god particle kept self replicating leaving more small pieces of matter behind matter so small its smaller than a quark or even smaller than whatever a quark is made of perhaps and since things seek to bond with each other the small particles started combinding forming other particles leading up to quarks than many quarks leading up to atoms atoms leading up to simple shugars and proteins than thay lead up to compounds than thay lead up to dna strands than thay lead up to more macro molecules or organells and such than cells than cells form structures of simple life such and bacteria and viruses etc... hope you know the rest) (thus if thay can make life thay can also make non liveing compounds as well) 2. if this partical replicated how did it seperate it self from the others just like a blood cell does a process kind of like meiosis 2 since there is stars and rock the star would melt the rock if it is from the same material (you need to be more clearer i dont understand your question) 3 were did the laws of physics come from? (many of the laws of physics come from a thing called magnitism made from positive and negative charges of elements and particles.) 4 how did life form so functional it is able to reproduce, eat and drink well life is just a bunch of smaller particles working as a group in order to grow and reproduce just like the god particle and in order to do that thay need to eat and drink which would be gathering other building blocks which would be the elements and molecules the food or drink is made out of. 4 (continue)and since evolution is false how did your life form from the big bang (this isnt the big bang the particle is a god particle it startted spreading across the universe/vast nothingness by self replicating and small exploshions accured every now and than becuse of the matter left behind forming into something similar to the hydrogen bomb leaving mass radio activity behind but the explosions spread the matter and particles furthur and faster) 5 how did your partical replicants not entropy over billions of years (i just awnsered ur question in the above awnser) 6 if your theory is before the big bang and since the earth was never molten which prove big bang false how did earth form i awnsered this already to. but to repeat since particles can form eather non liveing or liveing things the earth was obviously formed first in order to form life the explosions lead to heat this caused new molecules to form as well as energy and the molecules started forming into giant balls of burning gas molecules this provided light some other molecules affected by light from the large amount of gas molecules burning brightly "being stars/sun's formed other molecules that combined with others forming solid forms such as iron or granite and such clumping togather by larger chunks of iron having greater gravity pulling them in becoming infused with the larger chunk and forming a bigger one and thus forming earth... im sure you know the rest 7 this is not really a question just a statement your theory is based of pure 100% random chance and is only limited by your imagination. (my theory is based on random chance but it is so plausable and makes so much sense it cannot be considered a bullshit theory it makes more sense than the big bang)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.