pennieloot

currently its been used by silicate manufacturers illegally without removing the salt. If salt is removed than it can be a good value addition. I want to know a better application for it. around 400MT is produced every month

I have access to a pharma company waste which is mixture of 89% NahCo3 and 11% NaCl. What can be its application and what kind of further processing can be done to make is usable?. Its in massive quantities.

I have been through following papers for research: 1)http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1990ApJ...362..584M&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf 2)https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9905054.pdf Conclusion of the second paper given above states the following: " In this case the external action (the gravitational wave) amounts to a time variation of the frequency parameter of the initial system (charged particles in a magnetic field), so that in the overall system the equilibrium at rest (x 1 = 0) is unstable. Any deviation from this state, however small, is sufficient to lead to a rapidly increasing displacement along the peprendicular direction (Landau and Lifshitz 1976). Further analysis shows that, in any of the above propagation cases, the overall result would be an exponential increase of the perpendicular energy of the particles involved in this interaction, as a function of the affine parameter and, hence, of their proper-time as well. " From the conclusion I can understand that gravitational blueshift may be the reason for increasing frequency but what could be the reason for perpendicular displacement of particles and exponential increase in perpendicular energy?

Thanks for the explanation that clears alot. Also after equation 2b it states that resonance occurs at twice the larmor frequency and since exact 2:1 resonance's probability is almost zero, would there be a net increase or accelerating resonance even if the wave frequency was more than twice (lets say thrice or even 4-5 times) of larmor frequency ?

Oh ok. I actually thought that amplitude was for gravity wave. So for calculating arbitrary constant as told by you , what do I take distance as(for amplitude) ? Or rather how do I calculate distance?

Sorry it was a typo. I meant amplitude not alpha. What would you suggest as the most appropriate dimensionless form of measure for amplitude?

But if you read equation 2b alpha has to be dimensionless.

Thank You. But for calculating alpha= cos inverse w(0)/A (As you pointed out) I would require amplitude in distance. Now since I am trying to calculate in hypothetical situation How can I calculate amplitude if I know mass and speed of object generating it ? For the original equation 2b I had calculated alpha in Decibels since it was dimensionless.

This is the original paper: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1981ApJ...248..783P&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf

In the equation 2b of the following paper what is alpha? http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1990ApJ...362..584M&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf I am trying to solve this situation in hypothetical situations to get answer in m/s