Randolpin

If we consider that we were only the result of naturalistic random processes of the interaction of inanimate particles, how come inanimate particles create intelligent minds like humans, even humans themselves have difficulty in creating robots or creating living organisms, how much more inanimate particles interacting with each other in a random manner? Or in further view, how can disorganization produce organization? Feedbacks are very much appreciated.. Thank you

I want to clarify first that my speculation is base only on the situation of what would happen to an object travelling beyond c, not speculating a massive object.

Speed is how fast an object move in this physical reality. An object can move because there is space around it. We know base on the teaching of G.R. that no object can travel faster than the speed of light or even the speed of light itself because it is the top speed which our reality limits. We also know base on G.R. that an object that moves actually slows the time base on the perspective of observer and it changes it's shape as well as it increase it's mass. Now the intriguing part of it is that base on my speculation, if an object happens to travel faster than the speed of light it actually disappear on the view of an observer.Another profound speculation is that the object disappear because it actually violate the top speed of reality which is the speed of light. Speed of light has a profound relation on space. The object happened to be travelling faster than the speed of light disappear from the observers perspective because (my most profound speculation) it actually happens to be travelling beyond space-time !!! Those were only my speculations that I want to share on you.. Thank you..

Einstein Gr. is an improved version of how we look at gravity. I mean they are the same in some cases but the difference is that the new model is more accurate in describing the reality which we are part of. For example, we will compare again Newtonian gravity and Einsteinian gravity. Newton himself in his universal law of gravitation really don't know how gravity works meaning his model is less accurate in describing the reality of gravity, but time had passed and then Einstein existed and formulated his G.R. which accurately explain how gravity works. It shows a new profound understanding not only on gravity itself but also a new look on the property of space and time. Meaning, through Einstein's G.R. our knowledge of reality become more and more complex.

We are only innocents in the eyes of a neutral looker

I think this ends our discussion about this topic? I am not satisfied because science is limited. Is time existed in the domain of quantum mechanics? if not then time doesn't really exist. This reasoning is due to the property of qunatum mechanics which is very different from classical mechanics. According to mainstream science, qm has no cause which contradict the nature of time because "cause" property is a consequence of the arrow of time which is towards the future.

is it?

It is a question science can't answer.I plan to make a way on studying why nature is the way it is.

Where this quantum fluctuations came from and why it has the property to fluctuate?

ignorance is only an offense in the society where you violated it.

Yes it could be but I mean for example the theory of everything is developed from various discoveries of different scientists by uniting the different forces of nature like Maxwell discovered that electricity and magnetism are united into electromagnetism. Newton united the gravity of the heavens and the earth through his universal law of gravitation and Einstein even dream of the unification of gravity and electromagnetism but unsuccesful. But for now, TOE provides a unification of the 4 fundamental forces of nature through several theories like the m-theory etc. TOE tries to a put a piece of puzzle of reality by uniting the forces of nature.

So ignorance is really an offense if we base on the standards of our worldy societies,

Yes G.R, is correct because it describes the reality as what the gravity probe b presents. G.R. could be revised in the future but G.R. already put's one of the many puzzles of reality until it become complete, because our reality is like a jigsaw puzzle, we keep on finding the missing piece until it become complete. Can you please read it again:

Sorry but why is it still 1/2...

The best tester of it is the gravity probe b which prove general relativity.

If you consider yourself in the neutral side, I think it's not an offense but is it really an offense naturally or not?

Then why even in the lowest state it still have an energy?

We live in the world where we follow rules and regulations that control our lives. Is it really an offense when you violate a law due to ignorance of not knowing a it because all your heart, you know you are innocent?

By building instruments

So why q.m characterizes to having the lowest possible energy which is zero point energy? Why it is uncause? So it means that it doesn't require time or the time dimension is not real?

The irony is that, scientists have strong belief (e.g. atheism) of what reality is, when in fact, they don't know what reality is, since science is not the search for truth. Excuse me first, for example Newton proposed the law of universal gravitation while Einstein developed it to a more profound model of gravity, the general theory of relativity. Meaning, models could be develop for a closer look of the picture of reality. From a simple incomplete newtonian gravity into a more complex profound einsteinian gravity. Truth is not a moving target from science, in fact, science slowly building up the whole true picture of reality through successive revisions of scientific models which best describes the reality. Models are revised or developed from simple to more and more complex because our reality is really complex so it requires a complex model to describe it. I see it in the way that scientists invent models, revise or develop it until it exactly describe the reality. So I can say that science really searches the truth.

So we are not really sure what reality really is base on science. So science recognizes or uncover what truth is?

Yes, I know that. I just want to clarify, how come science is not the search for truth?

Yet still believe. I understand. Belief is still required for it to work. What's the difference between belief you can trust and not. There is no difference at all. They are both beliefs.... so science really searches the truth, meaning slowly seeking the complete picture of reality. Like your example, a building. Science is like a construction worker, it slowly builts a building until it become complete.

For example, we believe a certain model because it best fits in explaining our reality through the aid of logic. As what you have pointed already that a certain model of reality could be wrong if new better models of reality are discovered. So we are holding only on a belief.We are not sure of the true nature of reality. Because models could be wrong.