Butch

IMO the universe is infinite, but that still presents plenty of paradox, we just can't know anything for certain.

Mars has a weak magnetic field because it's core has cooled and solidified this has allowed the solar wind to scour away most of its atmosphere. That said NASA has observed aurorae on Mars, there is plenty of information on line.

I am 61 yrs. Old, if someone isn't already investigating it, it is probably not going to get done in my lifetime.I think it would be a useful experiment though, perhaps something NASA could take up.

I have read some articles on fairly simple measurement devices, just thought perhaps someone might have a hobby. I am interested in finding out if cooling over time can be detected.

Systems for measuring CMB are relatively simple (you don't need a satellite), I was wondering if perhaps anyone has been monitoring it for any length of time?

The first two squares have a difference of 13, That would be 36 and 49,marbles at start is 59.

1+12 = 13 2+11 = 13 3+10 = 13 4+9 = 13 Etc. Any more explanation needed?

I have some homework to do, I will do it. You all have been very helpful.

Yes, I am no expert, but I know enough to understand that it is a marker for the Big Bang.

I checked it was about 40 yrs ago, damn I'm old. OK 52... Do you think it can be measured accurately enough to be my measuring stick?

Dude! Freakin' awesome! You found the measuring stick! If CMB remains constant I am right, if not I am wrong. It was about 20 yrs ago it was detected and measured am I correct?

I would like to see how you arrived at that, not saying it is wrong, just something I had not considered and could be a great help.

My model has no effect on CMB, CMB is evidence of the Big Bang, I do not disagree.I have to go stretch fish lips, but there is a little corner of my mind that is always working on this... BBL.

It is not a formula it is a function. The Space axis represents the rate of expansion. Apply that to each of the Cartesian axies.

7) My model has no beginning. Time extends to infinity. The reason the Big Bang appears to have started 13.8 billion years ago is because of the curvature of space. When we look at things, no matter what form of detection we use we are looking at the past. We perceive Space as flat and Time as distorted in gravitational fields. The "beginning" of the Big Bang represents a point at which the universe was in a very dense state, Time would be compressed to a point where our observations would tell us that x point in time was the beginning. The point at which this occurs on my chart is @ x=1. Note that this point is fluid and moves with us through space time, as T0 moves. So in 10 billion years the Big Bang will still appear to have begun 13.8 billion years ago. Not much math here just that the curvature of Space is a hyperbolic function. It is a matter of understanding what that means to our observations in an infinite universe. The real math will be finding Hubbles place in this. That will take some time, so I don't see need to keep this topic open for now. Thank you again for your interest, I will be in touch.

3)This is like asking "Why did the Big Bang happen" better ask God, I do not now and never will have that answer, the evidence is there, so we accept it. 5) I will have to agree I need to work on this one, thank you for the challenge. 6) With my model, and with any model that has the universe expanding at an accelerating rate, there will need to be a source of energy outside of what we perceive as space time. If you know of any theories that touch upon this I would appreciate your input.

I will answer those seven again... Tomorrow. Night all you nerds.

No one inquired about orbits, orbits were a big hurdle! I do have answers about that! Tomorrow;)

The graph is simple, but it is not trivial. I tire now, but it has been fun. Please give my ideas some thought? We'll talk again.

Dr. Perlmuter says the acceleration has been going on since the Big Bang, his only qualification is that the rate of acceleration has not been constant, you made the statement that the acceleration has not been going on for 13.8 billion yrs. We're you wrong?

The evidence is gravity and the graph does match, ask Mr. Einstein! Your opinion on wether I am wrong or right does not matter, I may be wrong, I have been wrong many times. If you are really interested in this topic ask questions and I will answer... Your opinion really is not needed. Are you still a student?

Again let me repeat something I should not have to... There are no facts in science, there is only speculation, hypothesis and accepted theory! Nothing is wrong or right! Congratulations on an excellent demonstration of trolling, you should really be proud of yourself. Can you explain calculus? Do you know calculus? Are you saying Perlmuter is wrong also?

A factor of infinity is irrational as is infinity, however an example would be 1/2 infinity.

The hyperbolic curve becomes a right angle. This is because with limits of infinity x=1 is the equivalent to x=0. The implication for my hypothesis is that if time is infinite the universe expands into existence at an infinite rate of acceleration @ T0. This seems impossible at first, but after all does the universe exist one nanosecond ago? If you know calculus, you know what limits of infinity represents.

If we plot y=1/x^2 with limits of infinity we get something like this: